💠SUBSCRIBER'S INVESTMENT INCOME 💠 Investment Session #1280 Date: 05.05.26 ⬇️ 🔺Deposit - PROFIT 100000$ ⬆️ Tron scan link - CLICK Hash: a8ef69c8b46ae217acff788243b7a0c392f77b6dc60b4df90dd21d64f8dbfe1e The deposit was fully insured before the start DM to start now @Ming_ll_Consultant

Channel
Jusko Trader 🐋
@juskotraderreal1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
179,387subscribers
+65,444 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001833501405 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juskotraderreal1 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juskotraderreal1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 179,387 | -17,595 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 196,982 | -3,091 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 200,073 | -1,122 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 201,195 | -1,060 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 202,255 | -2,001 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 204,256 | +1,759 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 202,497 | -20,037 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 222,534 | -5,654 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 228,188 | -1,756 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 229,944 | -1,867 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 231,811 | -2,245 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 234,056 | -887 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 234,943 | -1,287 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 236,230 | -391 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 236,621 | -640 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 237,261 | -192 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 237,453 | +5,639 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 231,814 | +4,233 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 227,581 | +21,227 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 206,354 | first reading |
Engagement
231 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.99%
- avg views ÷ 179,387 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,160
- 160 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 160
- of 231 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 231 (14 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,145,036 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 39s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Few advice I can give you all after spending 9+ years in markets & earned more then $10 Million. You Will Never Make Money in Markets if, 1. Taking Random Trades by yourself Without Reason behind it. 🦖 2. Not Knowing Risk Management. 🦬 3. Not Following a True Trader That Have Networth of Minimum $1 Million.🐋 If Still Unprofitable, To be honest I Advice you all to Join Any VIP Channel not Only Mine reason behind…
https://t.me/Sirjusko
I will help 25 persons who can invest $300 to earn ($1,100) ($500) to earn ($2,750) ($1000) to earn ($5300) within 72 hours of our trading session, .. Ask me how to proceed This Offer is temporal ⚠️ First come first serve CONTACT ADMIN @Ming_ll_Consultant As always, we are strictly on first come first serve basis. Note!! Offers are created to consolidate supremacy and accuracy of our innovative tool for our …
VIP signal ❤️ I’m not here to tell you to join my VIP. I want you to see the results first and then decide for yourself whether it’s worth joining or not. In trading, results speak louder than words🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
This is the way how we are doing 🚀🚀🚀🚀
I’ll only take 15 more members.
🔥 VIP DISCOUNT OFFER 🔥 📅 ♾️ Lifetime VIP $999❌ → 80% OFF = $199 ONE-TIME 🚀 📈 Get access to VIP setups, entries & trading updates. @Ming_ll_Consultant
Want Discount for VIP Section!??
The next setup will be uploaded in the VIP section 📈🔥 If you haven’t joined yet, join the VIP now so you don’t miss the next setup 🚀💰
Work always speak for itself 🤑🤑
Share your Feednack guy’s because your feedback is our motivation 🤑 @Ming_ll_Consultant
Showing the 12 most recent of 231 posts we hold for @juskotraderreal1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@juskotraderreal · 80,772#1
@bitcoinbrother · 14,971#2
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,481#3
@SatoshiZeroX · 2,048#4
@hariskhantraderr · 4,204#5
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 29,558#6
@offiicialcryptopak · 6,486#7
@VerifiedCryptoTradersgram · 21,741#8
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 91,559#9
@cryptoamanvipfreemium · 3,864#10
@arscryptocalls7 · 130,875#11
@ThisisSOFM · 17,651#12
@KingCryptoCalls · 310,938#13
@amanvipcrypto · 11,189#14
@luv_aji · 890 (as read 24 August 2026)#15
@MarketXBT · 4,984#16
@altcoinchartmonkey · 552#17
@BsJoebidenkids · 1,816#18
@CryptooAiSignal · 772#19
@Degen_Krypto · 272#20
@Bit_InSightFAM · 371#21
@delbert_trading · 5,905#22
@whalewhisperscrypto · 3,426#23
@alicrypto12 · 163#24
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,039#25
@InsiderCryptoLeak · 3,830#26
@BCUSAReal · 148,789#27
@gorilla_crypto · 194,169#28
@BeginnerClub · 1,648#29
@bullishbantermain · 936#30
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,702#31
@cryptobulIet · 5,825#32
@TraderAdrians · 3,422#33
@GainsofCrypto · 4,615#34
@ResultsElite · 889#35
@OneMillionChallenge · 17,679#36
@USANewsTg · 8,668#37
@whale_alert_io · 300,107#38
@thescalpingpros · 2,253#39
@Whale_Alerts_io · 31,241#40
@Official_GCR · 53,069#41
@buertradesofficial · 10,012#42
@NovitaCrypto · 1,115#43
@AltcoinPulse · 3,982#44
@insidergemhunter23 · 52#45
@Binance_360_spot · 8,384#46
@BCUSAOfficial · 254#47
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 8,328#48
@crypttosignal · 537#49
@KPGLOBAL574official · 2,282#50
@GG_Shot_Leak · 4,859#51
@TCGFORYOU · 74,783#52
@Master_of_binanace · 10,770#53
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,390#54
@mrcrypto2O · 23,204#55
@Innercircletrade_Ict · 7,729#56
@leaks_vip_signals · 10,309#57
@TradingbyCFfreeCF · 951#58
@cryptoSFTcryptoSFT · 573#59
@alihsanpour · 500#60
@Nhacai369Viet · 156#61
@KALYAN_HEAD_OFFICE_VIP_GAME · 910#62
@kingest_bet · 1,670#63
@vipClubMentorAD · 2,796#64
@sciencedailyarticle · 1,181 (as read 24 August 2026)#65
@DsSocial · 835 (as read 24 August 2026)#66
@mmozga · 3,913#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@juskotraderreal · 80,772
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@Whale_Alerts_io · 31,241
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jusko Trader 🐋” (@juskotraderreal1), 179,387 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juskotraderreal1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.