Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 8 of the 12 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0222 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 22 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 16 days, net -69,394. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,311,277–2,401,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 21:56
2,321,686
-1,050
21 Aug 2026, 17:36
2,322,736
-4,389
20 Aug 2026, 17:53
2,327,125
-1,115
20 Aug 2026, 13:07
2,328,240
-2,280
19 Aug 2026, 16:03
2,330,520
-291
19 Aug 2026, 13:52
2,330,811
-3,565
18 Aug 2026, 17:46
2,334,376
-91
18 Aug 2026, 17:18
2,334,467
-3,659
17 Aug 2026, 19:18
2,338,126
-1,554
17 Aug 2026, 14:24
2,339,680
-3,676
16 Aug 2026, 17:22
2,343,356
-2,944
16 Aug 2026, 04:13
2,346,300
-4,880
15 Aug 2026, 02:23
2,351,180
-1,089
14 Aug 2026, 16:37
2,352,269
-4,141
13 Aug 2026, 17:36
2,356,410
-1,662
13 Aug 2026, 05:06
2,358,072
-1,051
12 Aug 2026, 18:27
2,359,123
-1,940
12 Aug 2026, 06:06
2,361,063
-2,246
11 Aug 2026, 21:56
2,363,309
-3,857
11 Aug 2026, 04:18
2,367,166
first reading
Engagement
562 posts held, back to 15 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,061 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.17%
avg views ÷ 2,321,686 subscribers
Avg views / post
96,700
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 562 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
562 (15 June 2024 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
2,031,400
Reactions total
35,400
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
466
Videos
23
Links
507
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 12 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 12of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.0 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 11.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 82.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 67,800 views — 2.92% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 78,300).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
51,064 reactions across 30 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,120
27.7%
🎉
11,555
22.6%
🔥
6,082
11.9%
🏆
4,965
9.72%
💯
4,900
9.60%
👍
4,617
9.04%
👏
4,420
8.66%
🌭
63
0.123%
🐳
58
0.114%
👀
50
0.098%
🥰
47
0.092%
👾
42
0.082%
👻
40
0.078%
🎃
20
0.039%
🦄
17
0.033%
☃
16
0.031%
💅
10
0.02%
🫡
10
0.02%
🎅
7
0.014%
🆒
6
0.012%
8 further kinds
19
0.037%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 556 of the 562 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,265,302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 562 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2024 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
88
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 556 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lab_trade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 562 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2024 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Agentic intelligence is coming to LAB
The goal: make LAB more than a place to execute trades, but a platform that can understand what you’re trying to do and help you act on it
More soon 👀
Buying crypto on LAB is as simple as it should be
With Moonpay onramps, you can go from fiat to a funded LAB wallet using your debit card, without leaving the app
Less time getting funds onchain = more time putting them to work
Game on
Bring your friends into LAB and get rewarded for it
LAB Referrals lets you share your referral link and earn from the activity of the users you bring in
The more people you introduce to LAB, the more your network can contribute to your rewards
$LAB claims are now live
Your LAB activity has been building toward this
Claim here
Before you connect your wallet, there are a couple of things to know 🧵
Once your $LAB is in your wallet, you can stake it across 3 different lockup periods:
• 2 weeks → 25%
• 2 months → 30%
• 6 months → 35%
The longer you stake, the higher your rewards
Stake here
Claiming your $LAB is just one part of what’s ahead
Keep using …
LAB Unlock is now live. 🔓
If you’re eligible, you can unlock your LAB rewards starting now.
Make sure you’re using the official link: https://claim.tokenops.xyz/p/lab
LAB will never DM you first. We will never ask for your seed phrase, send you to a private group, or provide an unlock link via DM.
Only use links shared through LAB’s official channels.
Unlock safely 🫡
🎮 Launch App | 🕊 Twitter | 🔵 Discord | 📣 Ann…
LAB Claims go live on August 14 at 1 AM UTC
If you’ve been using LAB from the early days, tomorrow is your moment to claim what you've earned
Before you claim, make sure you have ~$1 worth of BNB in your wallet to cover gas fees
Claim here
Once you claim your $LAB, you can stake it at https://stake.lab.pro
Choose the lock-up that works for you:
> 2 weeks → 25%
> 2 months → 30%
> 6 months → 35%
The longer you lo…
Your $LAB claim goes live this Friday
And if you're here for the long term, you won't have to leave it sitting idle
Claim your allocation, stake your $LAB, and start earning rewards from day one
The more conviction you have, the more your $LAB can do
Claim. Stake. Grow
LAB claims go live this Friday at 1 AM UTC
Early believers helped build LAB from day one
This claim is your reward for being early
Keep using the LAB App. The more active you are, the more incentives you'll be eligible for 🔔
Open your phone
How many apps do you use to manage your crypto?
Buy in one
Trade in another
Stake somewhere else
Track your portfolio on a fourth
We think there's a better way
LAB is built to be the app you open first, and the one you never have to leave
Competition makes crypto more fun
That's why every LAB user has a place on the leaderboard
See your points → track your progress → watch yourself climb throughout Rewards Season
The next trade could move you higher than you think
❤464🎉309🔥195🏆175👍159💯151👏150👀4
Showing the 12 most recent of 562 posts we hold for @lab_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 89,572 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@lab_trade named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@akedo_bot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@memeslabchatcis named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@tontradingbot_annoucement named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
26 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
blog.ton.orgregistrable domain: ton.org1 post · 3 November 2025 – 3 November 2025 · example post
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LAB” (@lab_trade), 2,321,686 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lab_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
