Channel name was changed to «Crazy Fazy»

Channel
Crazy Fazy
@lamo_shorts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,397subscribers
-3,788 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002152922391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lamo_shorts |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lamo_shorts |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:49 | 24,397 | -33 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:35 | 24,430 | -58 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:16 | 24,488 | -19 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:16 | 24,507 | -31 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:24 | 24,538 | -41 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 24,579 | -49 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 24,628 | -34 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 24,662 | -42 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 24,704 | -20 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 24,724 | -43 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 24,767 | -40 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 24,807 | -54 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 24,861 | -37 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 24,898 | -31 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 24,929 | -31 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 24,960 | -29 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 24,989 | -47 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:35 | 25,036 | -46 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 25,082 | -47 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 25,129 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 15 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 07s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
101 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 39.6% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 18.8% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 6.93% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 😴 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lamo_shorts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 November 2025 to 8 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🚨‼️🔥BREAKING: Huge columns of fire and smoke in Tehran after Israel bombed oil depots #BreakingNews
❤5🔥4
Breaking news: Seems Iran had an agreement not to attack neighbouring countries
❤2👍1
BREAKING: USA approved a $152 million emergency weapons sale to Israel including 12 000 BLU-110 1000-lb bombs. Some of the bombs will come from existing U.S. stockpiles while others will be produced. The bombs can be fitted with JDAM-class guidance kits for precision strikes. #BreakingNews
❤5😐2
BREAKING | Israeli missile sirens sound in Tiberias, western shore of the Sea of Galilee. #BreakingNews
🔥2🤔1
Crazy Fazy pinned Deleted message
#BREAKING #USA #MICHIGAN #MI 🔴 MICHIGAN :📹 MOMENT A TORNADO RAPIDLY APPROACHING A MOBILE STORE IN THREE RIVERS The person who shared the video tells CNN everyone in the store made it out safely. - CNN #Tornado #Tornade
❤2😱1
⚠️BREAKING: Hezbollah drones attack northern Israel. Sirens still spreading down the coast. عاجل: طائرات حزب الله المسيّرة تهاجم شمال إسرائيل. أصوات صفارات الإنذار لا تزال تدوي على طول الساحل. #BreakingNews #خبر_عاجل #Iran #Isreal
❤3🔥2😁1
Channel name was changed to «American war against Iran| الحرب الأمريكية الايرانية»
Hello everyone! 👋 I’m back and I will start posting more interesting content here. Stay tuned! 🔥 العربية: مرحباً بالجميع 👋 عدت من جديد وسأبدأ بنشر محتوى أكثر هنا. ترقبوا القادم 🔥
👍2😴1
Made in Egypt ‼️#Egypt #Arab
🤣4❤3🥰1
Video, posted without a caption
😁5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @lamo_shorts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BlockWawe_cr · 156,567#1
@autoruss · 743,251#2
@catidpaw · 201,744#3
@combobestchannel · 199,879#4
@pigscrew · 1,940,475#5
@catgoldminerann · 836,655#6
@seedupdates · 7,300,071#7
@obixtoken · 488,332#8
@ismaalphamoney · 52,938#9
@vestirussia · 911,401#10
@catapult_extreme · 7,643,443#11
@hamster_kombat · 19,679,426#12
@onus_globalchannel · 1,508,891#13
@mediarussia · 2,022,313#14
@hayzonn · 2,571,060#15
@telegabotua · 259,751#16
@undergroundinvestors · 7,397#17
@TaskNChannel · 838,220#18
@Cats_housewtf · 7,063,323#19
@teleintel · 43,858#20
@Avto_Maktab_Rasmiy · 1#21
@theTapCoins · 2,677,932#22
@dogs · 6,466,181#23
@realgoats_channel · 4,204,335#24
@theyescoin · 5,179,250#25
@trendingapps · 3,563,914#26
@AmioCommunity · 1,503,314#27
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#28
@hexnio · 1,843,911#29
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,006,059#30
@swopin · 68,563#31
@the_signal_24 · 5,420,280#32
@zigzagworld · 48,446#33
@banana_update · 1,296,590#34
@catizenann · 3,321,435#35
@Frogmatesannouncement · 110,410#36
@Birds_announcement · 1,414,805#37
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,569,860#38
@rockyrabbitio · 3,260,395#39
@hotonnear · 4,315,772#40
@the_vertus · 1,985,371#41
@tonstationgames · 2,895,535#42
@notcoin · 7,885,777#43
@metazoneofficial · 523,590#44
@Monkey_on_TON · 755,853#45
@dotcoincommunity · 3,648,851#46
@Coin_Strategist · 946,111#47
@TapcCombo · 4,282#48
@therealyescoin · 1,939,327#49
@smpl_app · 1,505,132#50
@CryptoAirdrop · 506,987#51
@dailycomboishere · 364,401#52
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,066,116#53
@EraOfExplorers · 659,883#54
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,121,180#55
@boopupdates · 1,211,826#56
@crypto_jeman · 624,325#57
@tapraccooncoin · 164,938#58
@gram · 6,249,316#59
@drive369_dao · 585,122#60
@boinkersnews · 2,328,830#61
@ushforexcommunity · 23,760#62
@transerfer_life · 2,539#63
@monorixofficial · 1,224,891#64
@tons_base · 453,091#65
@CherryTrendingEVM · 764,600#66
@diamoremarket · 317,068#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Avto_Maktab_Rasmiy · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@BlockWawe_cr · 156,567
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@catidpaw · 201,744
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@MPSC_SSC_Railway_Science_Math_GK · 57,077
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@Crypto_Dex_Calls_Signals · 25,639
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@ushforexcommunity · 23,760
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
@TonNewsMiniApp · 87,803
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crazy Fazy” (@lamo_shorts), 24,397 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lamo_shorts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.