Channel
@lider_delo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002964026928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lider_delo |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 24 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lider_delo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 51 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 50 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 48 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 49 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 49 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 51.4% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В продолжение исследования про вызовы HR 2026 (да и 2027 тоже). Первая статья, которая летит под нож, — обучение. Много раз мы «играли на этой гармошке». Свернули-развернули, срезали-вернули. Почему режут? Финансовый директор смотрит на расходы и его глазами: 📍Это FLEX. То есть статься расходов, которую можно быстро урезать или вообще убрать без немедленных юридических или технических последствий. 📍Это отложенный э…
❤2🔥1
Приоритеты работы HR в 2026
❤3
Ключевые изменения в этом году по сравнению с предыдущим
❤3
Топовые проблемы HR
❤3
Несколько полезных слайдов из актуального исследования HR-метр от Экопси. HR-метр — это ежегодное исследование и аналитический отчёт, в котором собраны ключевые показатели эффективности HR-служб компаний среднего и крупного бизнеса. Итак, 3 слайда о том, какие вызовы стали главными для HR в 2026 году по данным исследования 👇🏻 👇🏻 👇🏻 #говорит_рынок
❤3
👇🏻В следующих заметках мы поговорим о том, как руководителю работать с каждым из этих сценариев: как не поддаваться на проекции, как экологично отвечать на «я такой человек» и как не превращаться для подчинённых ни в «маму», ни в «папу», оставаясь профессиональным лидером. А пока — просто обратите внимание на то, откликается ли какой-то сценарий, когда вы вспоминаете вашу команду. Иногда одного осознания достаточно, …
👍2
По мотивам одной сессии по конфликтам. Обиды в коллективе — штука коварная. Обычно мы списываем их на характеры: кто-то слишком чувствительный, кто-то грубый, кто-то не умеет слушать. Но если присмотреться, за большинством конфликтов стоят не просто черты личности, а сложившиеся годами способы реагирования, которые мы часто не осознаём. Именно они превращают рабочие недоразумения в глубокие, затяжные обиды. ❗️Первы…
🔥2
Лидерские вызовы и компетенции руководителя #команды_и_культура #личность_в_бизнесе
Сегодня Вероника Мкртумян представляла Высшую экономическую школу на Уральском кофейном фестивале с темой "Кофейные волны и лидерство: компетенции руководителя нового времени". Несколько ключевых тезисов из выступления Вероники: 1. Почему понимание компетенций руководителя важно для бизнеса? Потому что компетенции - это устойчивые модели поведения лидера, которые позволяют ему успешно реализовывать свои управленч…
🔥3
Рейтинг IT-брендов работодателей ЭКОПСИ и Хабр 2025 Мы завершили 6-е масштабное исследование и составили новый рейтинг IT-брендов работодателей. В него вошли 127 компаний (в контуре исследования было 670 компаний), за которые более 30 000 IT-специалистов смогли не просто проголосовать, а обосновать причину выбора по 41 метрике. Главные инсайты, как изменился рынок за 2025 год: ⚫️IT-рынок штормит: компании перестр…
👍1
Друзья, какой формат контента хотели бы увидеть в нашем канале?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
«Антуаны»: зачем нужны встречи один на один Есть инструмент, который не требует бюджета, но даёт невероятный эффект - встречи один на один. Мы называем их с клиентами по-разному: кто-то говорит «один на один», кто-то - «антуаны». Но суть одна: это пространство, где руководитель и сотрудник могут поговорить по-настоящему. Эти встречи про то, чтобы: ➡️ увидеть, где человек застрял и что ему мешает двигаться; ➡️ понят…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lider_delo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, какой формат контента хотели бы увидеть в нашем канале?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Люди делают бизнес” (@lider_delo), 51 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lider_delo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.