Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LOOKFINDER

Channel

LOOKFINDER

@lookfinder

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,654subscribers

-1,122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001482790379
TypeChannel
Username@lookfinder
DescriptionПроект о мужском стиле и моде. По любым вопросам: @memnon93 Шопинг-гид для мужчин (790 руб/мес.) — https://look-finder.ru/shopping-guide Регистрация в РКН — https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6759718731a9292acd8bca43&registryType=bl
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lookfinder

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

52,65453,77653,2156 August 2026 — 53,776 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,759 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,756 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,745 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,720 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,708 subscribers13 August 2026 — 53,698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,682 subscribers15 August 2026 — 53,659 subscribers17 August 2026 — 53,639 subscribers18 August 2026 — 53,633 subscribers19 August 2026 — 53,624 subscribers20 August 2026 — 53,602 subscribers22 August 2026 — 53,591 subscribers23 August 2026 — 53,590 subscribers25 August 2026 — 53,581 subscribers25 August 2026 — 53,574 subscribers26 August 2026 — 53,560 subscribers28 August 2026 — 53,541 subscribers29 August 2026 — 53,532 subscribers30 August 2026 — 53,524 subscribers31 August 2026 — 53,492 subscribers1 September 2026 — 53,480 subscribers2 September 2026 — 53,466 subscribers3 September 2026 — 53,444 subscribers5 September 2026 — 53,413 subscribers8 September 2026 — 53,370 subscribers11 September 2026 — 53,339 subscribers13 September 2026 — 53,306 subscribers15 September 2026 — 53,282 subscribers16 September 2026 — 53,266 subscribers19 September 2026 — 53,214 subscribers26 September 2026 — 53,132 subscribers4 October 2026 — 53,051 subscribers9 October 2026 — 52,994 subscribers13 October 2026 — 52,947 subscribers14 October 2026 — 52,926 subscribers15 October 2026 — 52,913 subscribers16 October 2026 — 52,897 subscribers17 October 2026 — 52,876 subscribers18 October 2026 — 52,869 subscribers19 October 2026 — 52,866 subscribers20 October 2026 — 52,855 subscribers21 October 2026 — 52,834 subscribers22 October 2026 — 52,819 subscribers23 October 2026 — 52,814 subscribers24 October 2026 — 52,803 subscribers25 October 2026 — 52,793 subscribers26 October 2026 — 52,766 subscribers27 October 2026 — 52,758 subscribers28 October 2026 — 52,747 subscribers29 October 2026 — 52,740 subscribers30 October 2026 — 52,734 subscribers31 October 2026 — 52,720 subscribers1 November 2026 — 52,716 subscribers2 November 2026 — 52,697 subscribers3 November 2026 — 52,686 subscribers4 November 2026 — 52,674 subscribers5 November 2026 — 52,654 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -1,122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,486–53,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:0652,654-20
4 Nov 2026, 21:2752,674-12
3 Nov 2026, 18:1752,686-11
2 Nov 2026, 14:5952,697-19
1 Nov 2026, 17:1752,716-4
31 Oct 2026, 19:4152,720-14
30 Oct 2026, 19:2652,734-6
29 Oct 2026, 20:2152,740-7
28 Oct 2026, 20:2752,747-11
27 Oct 2026, 17:0052,758-8
26 Oct 2026, 18:2052,766-27
25 Oct 2026, 17:0552,793-10
24 Oct 2026, 18:1952,803-11
23 Oct 2026, 20:3552,814-5
22 Oct 2026, 23:1952,819-15
21 Oct 2026, 20:5052,834-21
20 Oct 2026, 18:1652,855-11
19 Oct 2026, 14:1852,866-3
18 Oct 2026, 11:4052,869-7
17 Oct 2026, 14:4052,876first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 52,654 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held60 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total61,360
Reactions total776
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,710
Videos
≈79
Links
≈1,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,195 reactions across 59 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥77335.2%
❤‍🔥68431.2%
👍39718.1%
👏1989.02%
🤔552.51%
👌532.41%
💔221.00%
🤯110.501%
😱20.091%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,227 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,690 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня предлагаем посмотреть на куртки No Faith Studios — немецкого бренда, который специализируется на дениме, но также создает неплохую верхнюю одежду в винтажном стиле. LOOKFINDER

👍10🔥8👏4🤔4

3 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,400 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Отличная возможность найти что-нибудь интересное: 6 и 7 ноября в Familia пройдёт День Культовых Брендов. К этому событию байеры целый год собирают топовые модели известных премиальных марок и редкие находки — всё это со скидками до -85%. На фото несколько примеров того, что будет: одежда от Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana и Kenzo, но список представленных брендов гораздо шире: Christian Dior, Givenchy, Moschino и Versace. Б…

🔥8👍5❤‍🔥3🤔3👌2💔1

2 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,780 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Бумеранг», 1992 г. — довольно стильный ромком с Эдди Мерфи, Холли Берри, Мартином Лоуренсом и Грейс Джонс. У последней просто феерическое появление в кадре. Сначала кажется, что фильм довольно уничижительный по отношению к женщинам, но когда вдруг возникает Грейс верхом на колеснице, запряжённой накачанными белыми мужчинами в латексе (подгоняя их плетью!), становится понятно, что фильм уничижительный по отношению …

❤‍🔥14🔥9👏5

30 Oct 2026, 16:27 UTC≈3,010 views41 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

В этом сезоне вся лента забита образами блогеров в парках и куртках цвета хаки по типу M-65. Причём встречаются они в самых разных сочетаниях: от повседневных комплектов до более трендовых образов в Y2K-эстетике. LOOKFINDER

👍24❤‍🔥8👏7🤔2

28 Oct 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,720 views33 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

Пока осень ещё в разгаре, давайте полюбуемся этими кадрами старых кампейнов Allegri — известной когда-то марки, которая производила плащи и другую верхнюю одежду. В конце концов, много ли вы знаете брендов, которые в разное время сотрудничали с Джорджо Армани, Марите и Франсуа Жирбо, Ромео Джильи, Массимо Ости и Мартаном Маржела? Мы вот — нет. LOOKFINDER

❤‍🔥17🔥8👍6👏2

27 Oct 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,130 views24 reactionsread 1 November 2026
Photo

Пора утепляться! Решили сделать смешанную подборку верхней одежды на холодный сезон. Здесь и пальто от подиумного корейского бренда, и актуальная в этом сезоне парка, и дутые куртки, в которых можно проходить всю зиму. Все вещи нашли в Studio Slow, концепт-сторе с неизменно классной селекцией азиатских и европейских брендов. ▪️Куртка Thisisneverthat | 41 990 руб. ▪️Пальто Coor | 48 990 руб. ▪️Куртка Frizmworks | 38…

❤‍🔥10🔥6👍4👏3🤯1

26 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,630 views41 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

Эклектичные многослойные образы блогера kshitij.bhatia В его стиле уживаются как современные молодые бренды, так и Polo Ralph Lauren, Levi’s, Armani Jeans, D&G двадцатилетней давности. LOOKFINDER

❤‍🔥20🔥11👏5🤔4👍1

25 Oct 2026, 19:41 UTC≈2,550 views30 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

Кстати, костюмы и пиджаки Botany 500 x Cartier Collection до сих пор можно найти на eBay и других ресейл-платформах. На фото — найденные на скорую руку бежевый пиджак и костюм. LOOKFINDER

👍18👏7👌5

25 Oct 2026, 19:39 UTC≈2,050 views25 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Forwarded from @lebonmotPhoto

Если вам кажется, что фэшн-коллаборации - это феномен нашего времени, и начался он с LV x Supreme, спешу вас разочаровать. В начале 1970-х году ювелирный дом Cartier объединился с американским производителем готовой одежды довольно среднего уровня Botany 500. Дело в том, что тот находился на грани банкротства и права на марку перешли компании Cohen and Sons, которая решила репозиционировать бренд в люксовой нише за с…

❤‍🔥14🔥7👏4

23 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,670 views39 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

Очень нравится аккаунт Пата Шерцера. Они с женой Сисси держат антикварную лавку и показывают в блоге свои находки, образы и эстетику загородной жизни. LOOKFINDER

🔥23👍9👏6🤔1

23 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC≈2,590 views36 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

Продолжаем готовиться к холодам и напоминаем, что в нашем шопинг-гиде вы найдете не только образы на каждый день, но и подборки аксессуаров, обуви, верхней и не только одежды, а также нашу любимую рубрику — находки с ресейла! Ждем вас🍂

👍20🔥9❤‍🔥7

21 Oct 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,580 views43 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

У Todd Snyder в лукбуке как обычно хороший стайлинг. Единственное, можно было бы обойтись без карабина) А вот работа с цветом и слоями очень нравится. На фото образы из коллекции FW 2026. LOOKFINDER

🔥26❤‍🔥8👏7👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @lookfinder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

the man who
@man_whos · 18,451
#1
BondarenkoKirill
@bondarenkokirilll · 42,554
#2
Stretford’s diary
@stretfordsdiary · 4,713
#3
Bon Mot
@lebonmot · 36,890
#4
Сделано в России
@madeinrussia · 11,842
#5
No girls here
@nogirlshere · 3,946
#6
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,531
#7
Mr. Stitch Journal
@mr_stitch_journal · 1,020
#8
Ö News
@omanko_news · 46,872
#9
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,114,607
#10
Durilka Tryaposhnaya
@durilkatryaposhnaya · 1,601
#11
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,619
#12
ferbers
@stasferbers · 7,497
#13
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 184,883
#14
Александр Ганин | О стиле
@sashganinstyle · 24,592
#15
Чувства Wearующих
@wearfeelings · 69,640
#16
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,274
#17
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,001
#18
Гоша Стил | Мужской стиль
@goshasteel1 · 7,094
#19
Марк шагал
@notesfrommarki · 1,099
#20
НАКЕД БУТС
@nakedboots · 33,283
#21
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,928
#22
Mash
@mash · 3,143,205
#23
Rozetked
@rozetked · 648,779
#24
Двач
@dvachannel · 970,189
#25
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 113,010
#26
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,118,113
#27
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,626,156
#28
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,091,275
#29
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,028,945
#30
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,558,006
#31
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,619
#32
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,612
#33
Дудь
@yurydud · 850,752
#34
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,059,560
#35
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 711,251
#36
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,717
#37
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,544,021
#38
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 794,814
#39
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,777
#40
NN
@naebnet · 2,180,138
#41
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,173,548
#42
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,806
#43
Банкста
@banksta · 439,502
#44
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 300,001
#45
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,895,472
#46
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 105,569
#47
Big Geek
@biggeekru · 598,440
#48
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 665,083
#49
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,792
#50
MUR
@fashion_mur · 205,443
#51
Сломанные пляски
@brokendance · 79,770
#52
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 422,050
#53
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 461,738
#54
КБ
@cbpub · 668,221
#55
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,531
#56
Тихое Место
@thequietplace · 51,200
#57
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,386
#58
A S T E L
@astel_telega · 4,593
#59
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,120,586
#60
Лентач
@oldlentach · 262,745
#61
KICKSPAPER
@KICKSPAPER · 15,232
#62
Мужской стилист Денис Гаврилов
@denisgavrilovstyle · 22,118
#63
Please
@pleasemob · 6,317
#64
Архитектурные излишества
@arkhlikbez · 123,480
#65
Культура джерси
@culturajersey · 10,253
#66
Russian Architecture
@RussianArchitecture · 49,383
#67
токсичная мода
@toxicfashion · 6,314
#68
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,441
#69
UNNWN
@unnwn · 7,402
#70
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 47,566
#71
Мир PlayStation
@world_playstation · 307,779
#72
High and Low
@highandlowru · 3,003
#73
Dzari
@DrDzari · 263,372
#74
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,176
#75
а можно потанцевальней?
@bestdjchannel · 39,852
#76
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,780
#77
U VAS JPEG!
@UVASJPEGG · 5,571
#78
Reddit
@Reddit · 161,068
#79
Правила жизни
@pravilamagru · 63,687
#80
f/64
@sixtyfourmag · 71,323
#81

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BondarenkoKirill
@bondarenkokirilll · 42,554
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 August 2026
Александр Ганин | О стиле
@sashganinstyle · 24,592
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 September 2026
Серго нашел,я купил
@sergonashel · 84,548
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
Мужской стилист Денис Гаврилов
@denisgavrilovstyle · 22,118
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LOOKFINDER” (@lookfinder), 52,654 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lookfinder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.