Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Missiles and nukes

Channel

Missiles and nukes

@missilesnukes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,405subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001544708817
TypeChannel
Username@missilesnukes
Created25 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/missilesnukes

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,40510,51610,460.56 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,503 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,498 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,490 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,480 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,477 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,470 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,466 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,463 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,460 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,456 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,442 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,439 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,438 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,433 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,425 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,424 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,415 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,411 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,405 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,388–10,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:4010,405-6
15 Sept 2026, 09:1810,411-4
13 Sept 2026, 16:4010,415-9
12 Sept 2026, 01:0110,424-1
9 Sept 2026, 13:3910,425-8
6 Sept 2026, 07:1610,433-5
4 Sept 2026, 02:2110,438-1
2 Sept 2026, 18:5510,439-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:3510,442-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:4410,444-3
30 Aug 2026, 16:4210,447-7
29 Aug 2026, 14:3310,454-2
28 Aug 2026, 17:5310,456-4
27 Aug 2026, 20:5410,460-3
26 Aug 2026, 23:4410,463-3
24 Aug 2026, 23:2910,466-4
23 Aug 2026, 12:0310,470-7
21 Aug 2026, 20:3610,477-3
20 Aug 2026, 17:2310,480-1
19 Aug 2026, 18:3210,481first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 10,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held73 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total25,694
Reactions total1,277
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 44s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,156 reactions across 72 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣67816.3%
😁43210.4%
🔥3929.43%
🫡3227.75%
3067.36%
💯2405.77%
👍1583.80%
🐳1543.71%
🤩1533.68%
1283.08%
🥰1263.03%
1212.91%
🤪1212.91%
😎952.29%
😱922.21%
❤‍🔥701.68%
👏671.61%
💩671.61%
👀571.37%
🏆421.01%
35 further kinds3358.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC801 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Iskander 1000 / 9M723-2 update 👍 its exist and tested but the serial number alone doesnt proves its the same used most likely its a simplified version for mass production

🔥20😁7🤪4🐳3

28 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC868 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

💥🚀 🇷🇺 YARS E ICBM test complete The training warheads ~3-4 MiRV (nominal yield of 150 and 300 kilotons each) arrived at the assigned area at the Kura training ground (Kamchatka Peninsula) @mod_russia_en

🫡18👍15🔥82🎅2🎄1💯1🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC896 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Strategic missile /drone campaign on 🇺🇦 food-retail switched to high gear the offensive firepower and the defensive AA counter fire difference is dozens of times in russian favour (UA starved of AA missiles ,they shoot down little or nothing unlike RU shoot down hundreds each day) safe to say its going to end very badly for Zely if its allowed to go on for many months or years

😎28👍7🤩5💯1🤪1😱1

28 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC795 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Anti ship cruise missile spent booster stage🚀 🇮🇷vs🇺🇸 most likely Paveh / KH 55

😍10🐳9🆒7😎2🌚1😢1

28 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC902 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Iranian / Yemeni AshBM s (blue anti ship , white ground attack)

🔥225👍4🐳2😁1

27 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC≈1,050 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Iskander 1000 story again , whiteout any physical evidence to show for it was an early prototype weapon used in testing but never mass produced . Its possible to make them ofc but it would require a slightly different production line and tooling which unless they build a new factory for it would slow down the existing productions (very unlikely they would do that)

🔥19👍115🌚4😁2🐳1👎1💯1

27 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,050 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

They continue make up stories about 🇰🇵 missiles like KN30 or KN23/24 , last documented use were in 2024 Identify them is dead easy , no such evidence presented recently

2210😁5👍4🌚1😱1

27 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC865 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

tRump s iran blockade is doomed to fail for many reasons ,countries involved goes against their OWN interests https://youtu.be/Q3Te5PIPh3g?t=206

💯17👍12😁3👌1🤡1😎1

27 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC909 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

One of the few cases uncovered over time , most likely it was the same type of behaviour everywhere . Mladic acted back in kind

18👍7💯6🤝4💩2😱1

27 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC898 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Mladic wasn't the only "war criminal" there ,all kinds of head choppers were running around like in Syria . Atrocities committed by both sides not just one People should avoid one sided history made up by MSM /NATO lies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_mujahideen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_fighters_in_the_Bosnian_War

💯3618👎4🤡2😁2🐳1👌1👍1

27 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC960 views94 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🫡🇷🇸 Another legend died General Ratko Mladic Mladic Takes Srebrenica - Operation Krivaja 95

🫡63🙏12🍾5🎉4💩3👏2🖕21

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @missilesnukes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTCAnonymous Poll248 voters

☄️

  1. Iskander M 🇷🇺 9K72050%
  2. KIMskander 🇰🇵 KN 2357%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

InfoDefenseENGLISH
@infodefENGLAND · 50,336
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,949
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Missiles and nukes” (@missilesnukes), 10,405 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/missilesnukes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.