Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Missiles and nukes

Channel

Missiles and nukes

@missilesnukes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,264subscribers

-252 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001544708817
TypeChannel
Username@missilesnukes
Created25 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/missilesnukes

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,26410,51610,3906 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,503 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,498 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,490 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,480 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,477 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,470 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,466 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,463 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,460 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,456 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,442 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,439 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,438 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,433 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,425 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,424 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,415 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,411 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,405 subscribers26 September 2026 — 10,380 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,346 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,332 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,326 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,325 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,321 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,320 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,317 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,313 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,308 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,305 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,303 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,300 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,298 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,294 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,292 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,290 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,291 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,285 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,284 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,278 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,273 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,271 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,269 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,270 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,267 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,264 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,226–10,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 22:0810,264-3
5 Nov 2026, 23:3610,267-3
5 Nov 2026, 03:0610,270+1
4 Nov 2026, 02:1110,269-2
2 Nov 2026, 23:5710,271-2
2 Nov 2026, 03:0910,273-5
1 Nov 2026, 01:0910,278-6
30 Oct 2026, 04:3910,284-1
29 Oct 2026, 04:4910,285-6
27 Oct 2026, 23:5410,291+1
27 Oct 2026, 00:2010,290-2
25 Oct 2026, 21:5610,292-2
24 Oct 2026, 20:0810,294-4
23 Oct 2026, 23:3110,298-2
22 Oct 2026, 22:0610,300-3
21 Oct 2026, 17:0610,303-2
20 Oct 2026, 16:0710,305-3
19 Oct 2026, 14:0410,308-5
18 Oct 2026, 16:5610,313-4
17 Oct 2026, 14:2110,317first reading

Engagement

106 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.95%
avg views ÷ 10,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 106 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held106 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total32,688
Reactions total1,546
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 21:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28m 38s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,702 reactions across 104 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,04518.3%
😁67211.8%
🔥5409.47%
🫡4287.51%
❤4127.23%
💯3335.84%
🤩1933.38%
👍1843.23%
😎1823.19%
🐳1763.09%
🥰1522.67%
🤪1472.58%
⚡1442.53%
✍1422.49%
😱1242.17%
❤‍🔥821.44%
👏761.33%
💩691.21%
👀671.18%
👌540.947%
37 further kinds4808.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,702 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (21.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC330 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Meanwhile in 🇰🇵 NK - KJU realms 😁

😎8❤4🏆1👀1👎1🔥1🆒1

6 Nov 2026, 18:27 UTC408 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Mighty Elon has fallen deleting vote for the failed regime tweets ... the new LGBT regime will rape him and his businesses literally every way possible for the next 10 years Illusion of power 😆

🤣16🍌2🖕1😁1😱1

5 Nov 2026, 22:27 UTC≈1,030 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Meanwhile in south korea 🇰🇷 YTN (CNN size 24h news TV locally, even key asian allies are laughing on Trumps epic fall)

🤣41🤪14😭3💯2❤1👍1👏1👻1

5 Nov 2026, 21:18 UTC977 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Please survive the nuclear war 🇪🇺 🇪🇺 🤣🇷🇺😁 for "72 hours" against 5000 nukes of Russia by stockpiling few dozen cans Thank you for you're attention in this matter - EU commission

🤣47👀3❤2👍1👨‍💻1🤡1😁1😱1

5 Nov 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,040 views71 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Putin dont like losers next day after Trumps political hold on power effectively annihilated he met the iranian major general Mohsen Rezaei ... 😂 how pulled it off in the great game of things : iran is permanent useful asset protecting the southern exposed flank (full with US proxies) of russia Trump is/was an expandable asset - a useful idiot

❤39🫡12🤣8😁5💯3🐳1👌1👍1

5 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC889 views42 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

All major rats 🐀 jumping off quickly from the sinking USS TRUMP / MAGA De Santis jumped one day earlier before the disaster struck (he know whats coming)

💯22🤣12❤4🐳2🎉1😱1

5 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC909 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

I’m not Christian 🇺🇸 , now get out and VOTE

  1. Yes sir13%
  2. Go fck yourself90%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤣21

5 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC874 views48 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

“I’m not Christian.” - Donald Trump 😑 🤔 so wtf you are ?

🤣32😈4😱4👀3💯2✍1🤡1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC771 views42 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

😺

🔥19😱8🐳7❤3👌3⚡1🙏1

5 Nov 2026, 14:41 UTC618 views51 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz and destroyed MAGA in 8 months ...

😁28🫡9🎉5🐳4❤2👏2💯1

4 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC993 views54 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⏰ Joseph Stalin — 'The only real power comes out of a long rifle.' Updated to 2026 : 'The only real power comes out of the warhead of a long missile.'🗣 either you are powerful or powerless

🫡39❤4😁4❤‍🔥3👨‍💻2🐳1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @missilesnukes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Poll143 voters

I’m not Christian 🇺🇸 , now get out and VOTE

  1. Yes sir13%
  2. Go fck yourself90%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTCAnonymous Poll248 voters

☄️

  1. Iskander M 🇷🇺 9K72050%
  2. KIMskander 🇰🇵 KN 2357%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

InfoDefenseENGLISH
@infodefENGLAND · 50,399
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,380
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Missiles and nukes” (@missilesnukes), 10,264 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/missilesnukes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.