Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 4 oz. | MMA&UFC

Channel

4 oz. | MMA&UFC

@mma4oz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,111subscribers

-406 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171471662
TypeChannel
Username@mma4oz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mma4oz

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,11115,51715,3147 August 2026 — 15,517 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,517 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,513 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,508 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,503 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,498 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,496 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,462 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,429 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,419 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,413 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,399 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,386 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,382 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,362 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,351 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,345 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,338 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,336 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,329 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,311 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,302 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,283 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,274 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,261 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,237 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,187 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,157 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,136 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,111 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -406. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,050–15,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:3915,111-25
15 Sept 2026, 13:5615,136-21
12 Sept 2026, 08:4015,157-30
10 Sept 2026, 06:0115,187-50
7 Sept 2026, 02:5715,237-24
4 Sept 2026, 11:2015,261-13
2 Sept 2026, 23:4615,274-9
1 Sept 2026, 19:4715,283-19
31 Aug 2026, 16:1415,302-9
30 Aug 2026, 15:4915,311-18
29 Aug 2026, 13:3415,329-7
28 Aug 2026, 10:0815,336-2
27 Aug 2026, 12:2515,338-7
26 Aug 2026, 14:4215,345-6
25 Aug 2026, 14:2215,351-11
24 Aug 2026, 16:3215,362-20
22 Aug 2026, 22:2715,382-4
21 Aug 2026, 15:4715,386-13
20 Aug 2026, 11:5415,399-14
19 Aug 2026, 11:4615,413first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

987 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥43744.3%
🤣11111.2%
10010.1%
🤯858.61%
🤝595.98%
custom 5467877604172254602545.47%
👏383.85%
❤‍🔥212.13%
💔141.42%
💯141.42%
131.32%
🫡111.11%
👌90.912%
😁60.608%
🗿40.405%
👍30.304%
😍20.203%
🙏20.203%
🤩20.203%
🤔10.101%
1 further kind10.101%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 987 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mma4oz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈5,230 views10 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Это было красиво

91

25 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈4,790 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ufceurasiaVideo

🇺🇿 Рамазан Темиров СНЁС Стива Эрцега в первом раунде! #UFCAbuDhabi 🔋 Поддержи наш канал бустом! UFC Eurasia | Подписаться

🔥64124

25 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC≈5,590 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🥊 UFC Абу-Даби меньше чем через час Прелимы стартуют в 16:00 по Мск Мейн кард в 19:00 по Мск Смотрим вместе, болеем за наших и обсуждаем все бои в комментарих к этому посту. Трансляция доступна на Кинопоиске, Матч Боец и Матч ТВ а так же бесплатно для зарегистрированных пользователей на сайте BetBoom. А посмотреть и сравни кэфы на все бои карда можно по этой ссылке.

🔥142🙏2👌1🤩1

23 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC≈5,190 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥6🤝3🤣32❤‍🔥1🗿1

22 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈5,440 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🥊 UFC в Абу-Даби уже на этой неделе и в удобное время! В преддверии турнира, на котором традиционно много бойцов из СНГ, хочу подсветить пару имён, на которые стоит обратить внимание. В прелимах дебютирует полутяж из команды Хабиба с нулём в графе поражений - Магомед Тучалов. Идёт жёстким фаворитом за 1.15 у BetBoom. Чемпион UAE Warriors умеет тушить свет и обладает большим арсеналом: уверенная стойка, жёсткие кол

🤝13🔥127custom 54678776041722546023

18 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC≈6,020 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🥊 UFC Oklahoma меньше чем через 2 часа. Прелимы стартуют в 00:00 Главный кард в 3:00 За исключением мейн ивента в карде почти нет громких имён. Тем не менее ожидаю увидеть как минимум несколько крутых разборок в стойке. Кстати, 4 атлета в карде с 0 в графе поражений, что добавит огня. Прогнозы на главный бой и то, как именно Дю Плеси прикончит пенсионера Усмана - пишем под этот пост.

🔥18🤝124

12 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈7,580 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

2 боя с Максом - 2 разорванных креста

🤯84💯14🫡7🗿3🤝32

Signed влад

11 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC≈7,470 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🥊UFC 329 стартует через несколько часов Прелимы начнутся в 00:00 по Мск Главный кард в 04:00 по Мск Пиши в комменты какой бой (кроме главного) ждёшь больше всего. Я вот жду доминацию на всех этажах от БСД в ко-мэйне.

🔥227🤝6custom 54678776041722546024🤩1

9 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC≈7,210 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Сможет ли Конор доставить Максату проблем?

  1. Пару вялых панчей, не более51%
  2. Да, Максу будет не просто28%
  3. Конор - легенда, Максу пиздец20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12😁3👍2🤔1

8 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈6,080 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Выжимка Международная неделя боёв в разгаре, все в ожидании возвращения МакГрегора и того, как он смачно отлетит от Максата в нокаут, так ведь? Как всегда, коротко по основным событиям вокруг турнира UFC 329 и не только: 🇺🇸Кормье отдал Пимблету 1000$, которые проспорил в их пари на матч США - Бельгия. Разумеется, DC топил за США, которых Бельгия одолела 4:1 на ЧМ. 💵Инсайдеры считают, что Конор за бой на UFC 329 з

🔥8815custom 54678776041722546024❤‍🔥3🤝2🤬1

27 Jun 2026, 18:58 UTC≈6,920 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Почему бои Физиева - всегда валидольные? Ваши мнения Видео нокаута в комментах

🔥462

27 Jun 2026, 17:51 UTC≈7,240 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Ранняя остановка в бою Садыхов - Камило

  1. Да, 100% рано43%
  2. Нет, ок остановка58%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mma4oz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll1,820 voters approx.

Сможет ли Конор доставить Максату проблем?

  1. Пару вялых панчей, не более51%
  2. Да, Максу будет не просто28%
  3. Конор - легенда, Максу пиздец20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jun 2026, 17:51 UTCAnonymous Poll718 voters

Ранняя остановка в бою Садыхов - Камило

  1. Да, 100% рано43%
  2. Нет, ок остановка58%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTCAnonymous Poll718 voters

Кто и почему? (почему —> в комменты)

  1. Рафа80%
  2. Торрес20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MMA review
@topMMAreview · 27,978
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
VKIDKA ММА
@vkidka_champ · 23,407
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV
@hardcoremma · 24,220
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Captain Hardcore
@caphard · 37,800
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Main Card
@MainCardMMA · 212,170
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
KALUGIN MMA
@kaluginboy · 50,501
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
UFC Eurasia
@ufceurasia · 417,201
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Кулаки (MMA, UFC, Top Dog на Кинопоиске)
@prostokulaki · 28,182
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
ALL MMA | UFC 331
@allmma · 70,574
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC
@dvoyechka · 22,402
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
BEST of MMA
@mmabestof · 29,625
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
Matveev | MMA & Boxing
@matveevmmaboxing · 22,661
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
Вестник MMA
@vestnik_mma · 26,118
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
MovieChannel
@movie7channel · 22,156
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“4 oz. | MMA&UFC” (@mma4oz), 15,111 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mma4oz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.