Все главные события в ММА и боксе в одном месте.
Сотрудничество: @ModeratorKalugin
Личный тгк Влада: @vladkalugin
Ютуб-каналы:
https://www.youtube.com/@Wildfight
https://www.youtube.com/@KaluginMMA
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
67 measurements spanning 44 days, net +3,880. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,987–51,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:01
50,501
+436
18 Sept 2026, 20:19
50,065
+1,004
17 Sept 2026, 04:37
49,061
-11
16 Sept 2026, 11:01
49,072
+12
15 Sept 2026, 04:41
49,060
-4
14 Sept 2026, 16:38
49,064
-37
13 Sept 2026, 12:55
49,101
-3
12 Sept 2026, 23:37
49,104
+12
11 Sept 2026, 13:40
49,092
-31
10 Sept 2026, 22:41
49,123
-68
8 Sept 2026, 21:38
49,191
-28
7 Sept 2026, 21:41
49,219
+191
5 Sept 2026, 16:41
49,028
+81
4 Sept 2026, 23:58
48,947
-11
3 Sept 2026, 16:57
48,958
-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:16
48,963
-24
2 Sept 2026, 11:53
48,987
-15
2 Sept 2026, 04:36
49,002
-26
1 Sept 2026, 10:24
49,028
-4
1 Sept 2026, 02:28
49,032
first reading
Engagement
815 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 50,501 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
466 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
466
of 815 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 465 of 466 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
815 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
4,973,470
Reactions total
195,255
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 05:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈50,500
Videos
≈7,010
Links
≈17,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 32m
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 175 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
334,199 reactions across 814 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
104,210
31.2%
🔥
77,970
23.3%
🤣
56,950
17.0%
👍
52,722
15.8%
💔
13,379
4.00%
👎
11,469
3.43%
custom 5210956306952758910
10,699
3.20%
😱
5,926
1.77%
custom 5454064486837133402
874
0.262%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 814 of the 815 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 334,199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 815 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
84
across the posts below
Posts paid on
56
of 815 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kaluginboy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 815 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇦🇲💬 | Арман ответил на слова Пимблетта о его выступлении против Руффи.
Говорит, что не волновался, когда не получалось провести тейкдаун:
Из клинча все ждут моей борьбы и забывают про собственное лицо (голову). Поэтому план на бой был таким: показать борьбу, заставить его сфокусироваться на борьбе – и в этот момент бросить локоть. У меня была примерно тысяча спаррингов, где я выбрасывал локоть. Я отрабатывал это ве…
🔥⚖️ | Джошуа Ван доволен тем, какие обороты набрали мухачи за последние годы. Говорит, что супербой с Петром Яном может подождать.
Моя задача – заставить людей интересоваться наилегчайшим весом, и, думаю, не только я, но и весь дивизион в целом отлично с этим справляется. Я горжусь тем, что являюсь бойцом наилегчайшего веса.
Также Ван уверен, что ФИНИШИРОВАЛ БЫ Пантожу, если бы не был травмирован (он уже говорил, ч…
🎁 Розыгрыш перчаток UFC!
Осталось времени: ОДИН ЧАС.
Потенциальных участников сейчас: 41.
Принять участие: https://t.me/kaluginboy/63720
ДА! Это последний пост по этому конкурсу. Потом только итоги)
😮🙅🏼♂️| Умар собирается ОТКАЗАТЬСЯ от борьбы в своих поединках, говорит Али Абдель-Азиз.
Умар прав, что он не борец – они с Усманом ударники. Поэтому я понял, что Умар говорит серьёзно. Умар – очень добрый парень, но в октагоне он никого не щадит. Я уверен, что в 2027-м он вернётся мстить
😳🤳| Усман Нурмагомедов обратился к Джону Джонсу после поражения его подопечного Гейбла Стивсона:
Что такое бумеранг знаешь, Джон? Дерьмо случается, удачи в будущем твоему парню.
Похоже, Нурмагомедов вспомнил видео, на котором Джон Джонс вместе с Сонгом Ядонгом празднует победу над Умаром Нурмагомедовым.
👀🇺🇸| Джон Джонс объяснил, почему Гейбл Стивсон не вышел на объявление результатов боя после нокаута от Шона Шарафа.
У Гейбла есть рабочая этика и желание побеждать, и я по-прежнему верю в него. Я уверен, что он станет одним из лучших тяжеловесов в UFC. Он обязательно вернётся — я в этом уверен.
❤️ - Правильное решение от Джонса!
👀 - Стоило проявить уважение и выйти на огласку результатов...
👊🏍| Шон Стрикланд сегодня попал в аварию на своем мотоцикле.
Я ударился головой о землю на скорости 95 км/ч. На мне не было шлема — я идиот. Это просто последствия того, что я перевернулся и ударился головой о землю. Я реально в паршивом состоянии, черт.
📷 Соцсети Шона
👀❌ | Кевин Вальехос говорит, что его соперник снялся ещё до анонса боя.
Он выбыл ещё до объявления поединка. Это очень разочаровывает…
Примерно на протяжении месяца аргентинец намекал на то, что у него есть дата и соперник.
🕰️🏆 | Алексу Перейре и Джошу Хокиту понадобилось одинаковое время, чтобы добраться до чемпионского боя в UFC.
Вот так выглядят их статистика в лиге перед первым титульником:
🇧🇷 3-0, победы КО/ТКО над Андреасом Михайлидисом и Шоном Стрикландом и решением над Бруно Сильвой. 2 бонуса за «Лучшее выступление вечера». Соперник в титульном бою: Исраэль Адесанья (6-я защита).
🇺🇸 4-0, 3 победы КО/ТКО над Максом Гименисом, …
⚡️✍️ | Обновлённые рейтинги UFC.
🔼 Джастин Гейджи вошёл в ТОП-3 рейтинга P4P.
🔼 Джошуа Ван прибавил ПЯТЬ позиций в P4P и стал 6-м.
✔️ Арман Царукян расположился на 13-й строчке рейтинга P4P.
✔️ Патрисио Питбуль занял 14-е место в полулёгком весе.
🔽 Маурисио Руффи опустился на 8-ю строчку среди легковесов.
❤183👍37😱8👎4🤣3
Showing the 12 most recent of 815 posts we hold for @kaluginboy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@kaluginboy edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Captain Hardcore @caphard · 37,800 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Matveev | MMA & Boxing @matveevmmaboxing · 22,661 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
MMA review @topMMAreview · 27,978 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Кулаки (MMA, UFC, Top Dog на Кинопоиске) @prostokulaki · 28,182 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
Вестник MMA @vestnik_mma · 26,118 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Матч! Боец @matchboets · 86,202 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Main Card @MainCardMMA · 212,170 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
BEST of MMA @mmabestof · 29,625 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
ALL MMA | UFC 331 @allmma · 70,574 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
UFC Eurasia @ufceurasia · 417,201 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
REDFURYMMA @REDFURYFT · 107,153 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
FightSpace @fight_space · 56,344 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
UFC @ufc330i · 22,715 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
VKIDKA ММА @vkidka_champ · 23,407 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC @dvoyechka · 22,402 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Наше Дело @nashedelo_official · 53,044 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
ACA MMA @acamma_russia · 47,688 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Игорь, как дела? @IgorKakDela1 · 27,446 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV @hardcoremma · 24,220 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Лютиков / MMA, UFC, русский спорт @a_lutikov · 25,547 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
КИМЧИ ПОП ММА @kimchipopmma · 71,089 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
RCC: MMA & Boxing @rcc_sport · 30,835 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
OLIMPBET | Fighting | old @olimpbet_fight · 23,156 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
ВСЕМ БОКС ЛАЙВ @vsembokslive · 38,558 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KALUGIN MMA” (@kaluginboy), 50,501 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaluginboy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.