Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +8,350. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 405,840–423,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:15
417,201
-144
16 Sept 2026, 22:40
417,345
-283
15 Sept 2026, 02:21
417,628
-221
13 Sept 2026, 15:22
417,849
-173
11 Sept 2026, 20:56
418,022
-539
9 Sept 2026, 08:55
418,561
-863
6 Sept 2026, 03:16
419,424
+1,584
3 Sept 2026, 23:41
417,840
-315
2 Sept 2026, 13:14
418,155
-291
1 Sept 2026, 11:55
418,446
-321
31 Aug 2026, 09:13
418,767
-139
30 Aug 2026, 10:04
418,906
+202
29 Aug 2026, 13:14
418,704
+676
28 Aug 2026, 16:13
418,028
-257
27 Aug 2026, 13:03
418,285
-246
26 Aug 2026, 09:32
418,531
-265
25 Aug 2026, 07:32
418,796
-340
24 Aug 2026, 03:57
419,136
-449
22 Aug 2026, 12:08
419,585
-377
21 Aug 2026, 00:05
419,962
first reading
Engagement
249 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 417,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
106,000
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
134
of 249 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
249 (1 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
14,203,700
Reactions total
330,243
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,920
Videos
≈2,710
Links
≈2,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
57m 11s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 97 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
635,154 reactions across 243 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
333,890
52.6%
🔥
113,155
17.8%
👍
47,929
7.55%
🤡
41,544
6.54%
⚡
27,607
4.35%
😁
19,068
3.00%
🏆
16,211
2.55%
😢
8,157
1.28%
custom 5276289730256842699
5,545
0.873%
👏
3,728
0.587%
🤯
2,985
0.47%
💔
2,895
0.456%
🤬
2,147
0.338%
🤩
2,084
0.328%
🤪
1,884
0.297%
🎉
1,808
0.285%
😱
1,700
0.268%
😐
1,031
0.162%
🗿
697
0.11%
😎
545
0.086%
2 further kinds
544
0.086%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 249 of the 249 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644,835 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ Пэдди Пимблетт не впечатлен выступлением Царукяна на #UFC331
Как бы он мне ни не нравился, но удар локтем был крутой. До этого локтя Арман смотрелся довольно дерьмово. Его глаз уже был сильно разбит. Жаль, что он попал – хотелось бы посмотреть, как прошли бы второй и третий раунды. Я думаю, этот бой показал дыры в его игре. Его борьба не настолько хороша, как он думает.
⚡️ На пресс-конференции после #UFC331 Арман заявил, что чемпион избегает боя с ним.
Джастин никогда не называл мое имя. Он боится. Он хотел, чтобы Руффи меня нокаутировал. Он пытается избежать боя со мной и вызвать Илию Топурию или сказать что-то вроде: «Я хочу 15 миллионов долларов за бой с Арманом или завершу карьеру».
💰 #UFC331: Бонусы после турнира
Лучший бой вечера – Джошуа Ван vs Александр Пантожа
Лучшее выступление вечера – Кейси О’Нилл и Арман Царукян
MobLand Bonus (бонус за "настоящий хаос") – Шон Шараф
👏 Арман Царукян оформил потрясающий нокаут в первом раунде! #UFC331
При поддержке официального спонсора UFC Bakai Bank
❤2,760🔥896🏆258🤡80👏53👍45😎12🎉6
Showing the 12 most recent of 249 posts we hold for @ufceurasia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ufceurasia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 67 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кулаки (MMA, UFC, Top Dog на Кинопоиске) @prostokulaki · 28,182 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
Матч! Боец @matchboets · 86,202 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Main Card @MainCardMMA · 212,170 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
VKIDKA ММА @vkidka_champ · 23,407 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Игорь, как дела? @IgorKakDela1 · 27,446 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
BEST of MMA @mmabestof · 29,625 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
REDFURYMMA @REDFURYFT · 107,153 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Hardcore Fighting @hardcore_fightingtg · 252,770 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC @dvoyechka · 22,402 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
MMA review @topMMAreview · 27,978 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
PRO UFC | FIGHT @proufc_fight · 49,693 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
Captain Hardcore @caphard · 37,800 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Лютиков / MMA, UFC, русский спорт @a_lutikov · 25,547 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
ALL MMA | UFC 331 @allmma · 70,574 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV @hardcoremma · 24,220 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
OCTAGON | MMA LEAGUE @octagonleague · 35,661 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
KALUGIN MMA @kaluginboy · 50,501 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
Наше Дело @nashedelo_official · 53,044 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
UFC @ufc330i · 22,715 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
RCC: MMA & Boxing @rcc_sport · 30,835 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
ВСЕМ БОКС ЛАЙВ @vsembokslive · 38,558 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
КОВАЛЕНКО СВЯТ @Kovalenkosvyat · 98,197 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Вестник MMA @vestnik_mma · 26,118 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Matveev | MMA & Boxing @matveevmmaboxing · 22,661 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Магомедов, Шарабутдин Магомедович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…(против [[Олексейчук, Михал|Михала Олексейчука]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ufceurasia/7838|title=🚀 Результаты и бонусы #UFCAbuDhabi: Сэндхаген vs…” read 13 September 2026
Магомедов Шарабутдін Магомедович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…(проти [[Олексейчук, Михал|Міхала Олексейчука]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ufceurasia/7838|title=🚀 Підсумки та бонусы #UFCAbuDhabi: Сэндхаген vs…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UFC Eurasia” (@ufceurasia), 417,201 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ufceurasia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.