Хабиб, Емельяненко, Шлеменко и другие герои русского спорта — канал отставного журналиста Александра Лютикова.
Мой ютуб-канал: https://www.youtube.com/@a_lutikov
Реклама: @lyoutube_tg
Регистрация РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67701b0b6aa9672b96364325
Created
21 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
24,300 average views per post against 25,547 subscribers — an engagement rate of 95.3%. Across the 17,210 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.73% and 17.9%, with a median of 9.18%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured
24 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
584,300
Mature posts only
95.3% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +792. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,584–25,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:38
25,547
+24
16 Sept 2026, 07:00
25,523
+19
14 Sept 2026, 16:38
25,504
+26
13 Sept 2026, 03:20
25,478
+30
11 Sept 2026, 06:38
25,448
-25
8 Sept 2026, 07:55
25,473
+42
5 Sept 2026, 03:38
25,431
+34
3 Sept 2026, 09:16
25,397
+11
2 Sept 2026, 02:46
25,386
+26
1 Sept 2026, 00:54
25,360
+152
31 Aug 2026, 00:44
25,208
+122
29 Aug 2026, 22:02
25,086
+67
28 Aug 2026, 21:34
25,019
+28
27 Aug 2026, 19:43
24,991
+25
26 Aug 2026, 18:54
24,966
+39
25 Aug 2026, 16:09
24,927
+217
24 Aug 2026, 13:08
24,710
-26
22 Aug 2026, 21:13
24,736
-3
21 Aug 2026, 10:27
24,739
+3
20 Aug 2026, 11:14
24,736
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
97.6%
avg views ÷ 25,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,900
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
60 (12 July 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
548,800
Reactions total
12,174
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
766
Videos
619
Links
747
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
22m 54s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31,862 reactions across 59 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
19,904
62.5%
👍
2,913
9.14%
🔥
2,773
8.70%
❤
2,583
8.11%
💯
1,202
3.77%
🤬
1,009
3.17%
😢
1,004
3.15%
👎
361
1.13%
⚡
113
0.355%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,862 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
48
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 59 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @a_lutikov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В 31 год умер бывший чемпион Fight Nights Григорий Пономарев.
Григорий провел всего девять боев в профессионалах, дрался только в России, но это была шумная карьера:
• Тренировался с командой Федора в Старом Осколе, за что получил прозвище Гигант из зала Федора (придумано журналистом Ярославом Степановым). Это прозвище не отлипало от Григория даже после того, как он ушел из зала Федора в 2022 году.
• Прославился ш…
В 2027 году все чемпионы UFC будут из России.
120 кг Александр Волков
93 кг Магомед Анкалаев
84 кг Шара Буллет или Влад Белаз
77 кг Ислам Махачев
70 кг Арман Царукян или Усман Нурмагомедов
66 кг Мовсар Евлоев
61 кг Петр Ян
57 кг Умар Нурмагомедов
52 кг Мага Кнопка
47 кг Мага Большой
Страшно представить, что будут делать американцы, чтобы этого не допустить...
Удивительная хоккейная драка произошла на днях в Новосибирске.
До конца матча одна секунда... Любительская команда "Пионер" побеждает со счетом 6:2... Но ее игроки все равно находят повод подраться МЕЖДУ СОБОЙ.
23-летний Дмитрий, казалось, вот-вот уронит 36-летнего Илью, но... Но старый хоккейный волк шел вперед, не обращая внимания на пропущенные удары. В итоге он загнал молодого в угол и отстоял свое право выходи…
Итак, канал ТНТ решил познакомить Россию с Заликом Юсуповым.
Залик зашел в первую серию новых "Титанов" вниз головой, на руках, и тут же начал душить олимпийского чемпиона по боксу Рахима Чахкиева. Когда их растащили и Чахкиев попытался установить в общении ДИСТАНЦИЮ, Залик вновь эту дистанцию сократил и перевел Чахкиева на пол.
Возникла очень неловкая ситуация. Поскольку в студии не было Умара Кремлева, некому был…
Топовый Пёс и его послушное стадо баранов.
На видео — что происходит в комментариях под каждой записью, в которой кто-то недостаточно восхищается уровнем лиги Топ Дог.
Кстати, если вы пропустили:
• вчера ММАшник Влад Белаз без проблем разобрал чемпиона Топ Дог. Просто перефехтовал его, даже не готовясь к бою по кулачке.
• Своего чемпиона Топ Дог сдал в аренду в другую лигу (что само по себе позорище).
• Говорят…
Иван Штырков ожидаемо победил Вагаба Вагабова по ММА на голых кулаках (решением судей).
Формат очень крутой. Вот это и есть настоящие кулачные бои, к которым не готов ни один чемпион Топ Дог.
АХАХАХАХАХАХА
ММАшник Влад Белаз победил чемпиона Топ Дог в кулачном бою.
В принципе, на этом Топ Дог можно закрывать.
К другим новостям. Лига RCC, по давней традиции, украла и присвоила чужую идею — на этот раз обворован хозяин М-1 Вадим Финкельштейн, который в 2013 году придумал и запатентовал "рейдж" — смесь ринга и клетки.
И вот в 2026 году глава RCC Николай Клименко заявляет:
"Мы долго думали, в каком формат…
Ровно 10 месяцев назад это был ПЯТЫЙ НОМЕР рейтинга тяжелого веса UFC.
А теперь он приезжает в Россию, пытается забороть Хадиса Ибрагимова и больно плюхается на пол. Добро пожаловать в АСА!
Уже сегодня Жаилтон Алмейда будет драться в Краснодаре с Евгением Гончаровым — ПЯТЫМ НОМЕРОМ рейтинга АСА. А это значит, что мы наконец-то выясним, в какой лиге пятые номера сильнее!
Начало турнира АСА 207 — в 15:25, Главные бо…
Прошу вашей поддержки по одному из главных вопросов в наших мэмэа.
Надо разрешить тейпировать пупки, чтобы потом спортсменам не приходилось редактировать фотографии!
Ведь что плохо: на фотографии это еще можно исправить, но видео-то остается...
Представляете, человек включает турнир, где ты дерешься (тут все норм) за деньги (допустимо) весь в своих и чужих соплях (ну и что, что кровь из носа?) на грязном полу (где…
А вот и настоящая причина использования ИИ для съемки альтернативной концовки боя Лопушанский — Туйчиев.
Оказывается, судьи в бою насчитали победу Туйчиева 2-1 по раундам, но ЗАБЫЛИ, что у него есть минус балл за провал на взвешивании (на видео — момент объявления желтой карточки перед боем).
Уже после того, как Туйчиеву подняли руку, судьи подошли к организаторам и признали ошибку. После этого результат боя был из…
Прекрасная история: уважаемый бойцовский клуб «Кузня» был уличен в использовании искусственного интеллекта для внесения нужного результата в базу статистики.
Этим летом Михаил Лопушанский дрался с Диловаршохом Туйчиевым на турнире в Усть-Лабинске в рамках фестиваля БЫТЬ КАЗАКОМ — и проиграл по итогам трех раундов.
Но «Кузня» выставила в своих соцсетях видео боя с измененной концовкой: если в реальности рефери Ксени…
Тем временем американцы ГРОМЯТ российских борцов на турнире в Мытищах... Счет уже 7:0...
Кайл Снайдер победил Ахмеда Тажудинова;
Кайл Дейк — Магомедхабиба Кадимагомедова;
Джордан Барроуз — Магомеда Курбаналиева;
Кеннеди Блейдс — Вусалу Парфианович;
Бо Никал — Ширвани Мурадова;
Джейсон Нолф — Исмаила Ханиева;
Виталий Оруджев — Сослана Рамонова.
Просто жесть... Зато Кайл Снайдер на русском языке сказал: "Иисус — вели…
🤣769❤65👍28💯13😢10⚡7👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @a_lutikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
MMA и смешные единоборства | Вадим Тихомиров х Спортс" @TikhomirovMMA · 3,909#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FightSpace @fight_space · 56,344 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
RCC: MMA & Boxing @rcc_sport · 30,835 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
КИМЧИ ПОП ММА @kimchipopmma · 71,089 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
КОВАЛЕНКО СВЯТ @Kovalenkosvyat · 98,197 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Игорь, как дела? @IgorKakDela1 · 27,446 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Наше Дело @nashedelo_official · 53,044 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
Двоечка ММА | UFC @dvoyechka · 22,402 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Другая История @drugaiaistoria · 32,777 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026
Captain Hardcore @caphard · 37,800 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
ACA MMA @acamma_russia · 47,688 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
HARDCORE MMA & BNGTV @hardcoremma · 24,220 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
BEST of MMA @mmabestof · 29,625 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
ВСЕМ БОКС ЛАЙВ @vsembokslive · 38,558 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
ALL MMA | UFC 331 @allmma · 70,574 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Matveev | MMA & Boxing @matveevmmaboxing · 22,661 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
Вестник MMA @vestnik_mma · 26,118 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
KALUGIN MMA @kaluginboy · 50,501 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лютиков / MMA, UFC, русский спорт” (@a_lutikov), 25,547 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a_lutikov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.