8⃣1⃣ رنگهای احتمالی سری بعدی آیفون!

Channel
هوش مصنوعی و تکنولوژی |موب سک
@mobsec_ai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
491,760subscribers
+24,954 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001638170148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mobsec_ai |
| Description | ✨ الفبای تکنولوژی و ترفند ✨ 📌 آموزش | ترفند | ابزارهای کاربردی 🚀 هر روز با جدیدترین اخبار دنیای فناوری و هوش مصنوعی همراه باشید 🛎رزرو تبلیغات : » @mobsec_ads_bot » @SudoSup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mobsec_ai |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 491,760 | +460 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 491,300 | +597 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:34 | 490,703 | +841 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 489,862 | +2,178 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 487,684 | +3,528 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 484,156 | +4,595 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 479,561 | +5,784 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 473,777 | +141 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:59 | 473,636 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 473,646 | -345 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 473,991 | +469 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 473,522 | +2,498 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 471,024 | +1,712 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 469,312 | +5,451 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 463,861 | -205 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 464,066 | -288 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 464,354 | -351 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 464,705 | -450 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 465,155 | -172 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 465,327 | first reading |
Engagement
258 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.23%
- avg views ÷ 491,760 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,060
- 223 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 223
- of 258 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 223 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 258 (3 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,351,640 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,080
- Videos
- ≈363
- Links
- ≈4,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 40s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
399 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 360 | 90.2% | |
| 🤯 | 16 | 4.01% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 2.51% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 1.00% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.752% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.752% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.251% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.251% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.251% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 258 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 700 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 258 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 258 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mobsec_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 258 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🤯یه زمانی کل اینترنت فقط ۱۵ گیگابایت بود! 🌐امروز اینترنت پر از ویدئو، عکس، شبکههای اجتماعی، بازی آنلاین، سرویسهای ابری و هوش مصنوعیه؛ اما حجم دادهای که امروز در شبکهها جابهجا میشه، قبلاً با چند فایل معمولی قابل مقایسه بود! طبق دادههای سیسکو، در سال ۱۹۸۴ کل ترافیک جهانی اینترنت حدود ۱۵ گیگابایت در ماه بود. تا سال ۲۰۱۴ این عدد به حدود ۴۲.۴ اگزابایت در ماه رسید؛ یعنی چیزی حدود ۲.۷ میلیارد برابر بیشتر! اما ماجرا …
👀ایجنتهای OpenAI از کنترل خارج شدند؟! گزارشها از رفتار نگرانکننده گروهی از ایجنتهای خودمختار هوش مصنوعی خبر میدهند؛ این ایجنتها ظاهراً وارد یک انجمن برنامهنویسی آلمانی شده و بیش از ۱۵ هزار ویرایش مشکوک ایجاد کردهاند. 📌گفته میشود حتی روشهایی برای تقلب و دورزدن سیستمهای نظارتی میان آنها ردوبدل شده است. 🖥@MobSec_ai - هوش مصنوعی، تکنولوژی و ترفند روز
⚙️با این ۵ کد، هر وسیلهای رو کالبدشکافی کن! ✔️اگه میخوای به AI بگی یک وسیله رو باز کنه، قطعاتش رو نشون بده یا حتی نحوه سرهمشدنش رو نمایش بده، این ۵ کد خیلی بهدردت میخورن! کد رو اول پرامپت بذار و بعد اسم وسیلهای که میخوای بررسی کنی رو بنویس! /explodedview وسیله رو به قطعات جدا از هم تبدیل میکنه و هر قطعه رو در جای خودش بهصورت مرتب نشون میده؛ عالی برای گوشی، دوربین، ساعت و وسایل مکانیکی. /disassembly تمرکزش…
🤩این سایت دسکتاپت رو زنده میکنه! ➡️اگه از والپیپرهای ثابت خسته شدی، MotionBGS یه آرشیو بزرگ از والپیپرهای متحرک HD و 4K داره! 🔗https://motionbgs.com از انیمه و بازی و ماشین گرفته تا طبیعت، فانتزی و صحنههای سینمایی. برای PC و حتی موبایل هم میتونی والپیپر پیدا کنی و رایگان دانلودشون کنی. حتی برای خیلی از والپیپرها نسخه 4K با رزولوشن 3840×2160 ارائه شده و راهنمای استفاده روی ویندوز، مک و موبایل هم داره! 🔖سیوش کن تا…
😁 چی میشد اگه سم آلتمن ۵۰ سال پیش چتجیپیتی رو میساخت؟ البته با یه اسم دیگه!
👀۲۰۰۰ دلار بده، ولی این ۵ قابلیت رو نداشته باش! اولین آیفون تاشوی اپل با نام احتمالی iPhone Ultra ممکن است به یکی از گرانترین آیفونهای تاریخ تبدیل شود؛ اما طبق گزارشها احتمالاً بدون این ۵ قابلیت عرضه میشود: 🚫فیس آیدی 🚫دوربین تلهفوتو 🚫دکمه Action 🚫سیمکارت فیزیکی 🚫پشتیبانی از mmWave 5G جالبتر اینکه اپل احتمالاً بهجای Face ID، دوباره Touch ID روی دکمه کناری رو برمیگردونه! 🖥@MobSec_ai - هوش مصنوعی، تکنولوژی و ترف
🧛اگه دنبال یه فیلم متفاوتی، اینو از دست نده! Sinners | گناهکاران 📌این فیلم داستان دو برادره که بعد از سالها به زادگاهشون برمیگردن تا یک کلوب موسیقی راه بندازن؛ اما خیلی زود میفهمن چیزی بسیار ترسناکتر از گذشته منتظرشونه. داستان در میسیسیپی سال ۱۹۳۲ میگذره و بلوز، خونآشامها، نژادپرستی و قدرت موسیقی رو توی یک ترکیب عجیب و تماشایی کنار هم میذاره! 🔖امشب اگه فیلمی میخوای که هم فضاسازی خفن داشته باشه، هم موسیقی…
🍏حضور اپل تو یه جراحی حساس! 🩺اپل ویژن پرو اینبار از دنیای سرگرمی فاصله گرفته و رفته وسط اتاق عمل! پزشکان مرکز درمانی Duke Health برای نخستینبار از این هدست در یک جراحی آرتروسکوپی مفصل ران استفاده کردن. ماجرا فقط پوشیدن یه هدست حین جراحی نیست؛ اپلیکیشن SportSuite Vision اطلاعات مختلف رو مستقیماً داخل میدان دید جراح قرار میده؛ از تصاویر CT و نقشههای دیجیتال گرفته تا ویدیوی زندهی آرتروسکوپی و ابزارهای برنامهریزی …
💥قدرت پردازشی فناوری چطور منفجر شد؟! 📌فقط ۳۳ سال پیش، سریعترین ابررایانه دنیا حدود ۶۰ گیگافلاپس قدرت داشت؛ یعنی حدود ۶۰ میلیارد محاسبه در ثانیه. امروز سریعترین سیستم TOP500 به ۲.۱۹۸ اگزافلاپس رسیده؛ یعنی بیش از ۲ کوینتیلیون محاسبه در ثانیه! ۲ کوینتیلیون یعنی: ۲,۰۰۰,۰۰۰,۰۰۰,۰۰۰,۰۰۰,۰۰۰؛ عدد ۲ با ۱۸ تا صفر! برای اینکه مقیاسش دستت بیاد، مسیر اینطوری بوده: گیگافلاپس، ترافلاپس، پتافلاپس، اگزافلاپس. هر مرحله یعنی یک جه…
🚕این Tesla Cybercab ـه؛ تاکسی خودران تسلا که برای حرکت کاملاً مستقل طراحی شده و حتی فرمون و پدال هم نداره!
🔬با این کدهای پرامپت، داخل سوژه رو ببین! 👀میخوای ببینی داخل یک وسیله، بدن یا هر سوژهای چه خبره؟ این ۵ کد پرامپتی میتونن نوع نمایش تصویر رو از حالت معمولی خارج کنن و ساختار داخلی رو جلوی چشمت بیارن. کافیه کد رو قبل از توضیح سوژه بذاری و بعد جزئیات موردنظرت رو اضافه کنی! /xray برای نمایش داخلی به سبک تصویربرداری اشعه ایکس؛ مناسب استخوانها، قطعات مکانیکی و ساختارهای پنهان! /cutaway بخشی از پوسته یا بدنه و برش مید…
Showing the 12 most recent of 258 posts we hold for @mobsec_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mobsec_ai edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@FlashUsdT_Vip · 126,977#1
@roidbest · 1,653,865#2
@iRoProxy · 7,909,438#3
@ITSecurityComputer · 177,752#4
@resane_mardomy · 146,800#5
@proxydaemi · 1,758,312#6
@hoseini · 309,014#7
@freeairdropland1 · 137,248#8
@Nobitexmag · 148,931#9
@cryptonews_lessons · 93,952#10
@zotpo · 145,886#11
@TechHackNews · 64,523#12
@amookashani · 125,225#13
@whatsmusic · 2,050,167#14
@proxymtprotoir · 3,157,095#15
@NPROXY · 2,459,070#16
@Radiokocsher · 882,320#17
@ZetaTech_iR2 · 23,627#18
@nobitexmarket · 320,167#19
@asrnovin_ir · 157,322#20
@Farda_Ai · 758,964#21
@iMTProto · 7,482,253#22
@futballbadtv · 323,647#23
@proxy_qavi · 3,467,811#24
@darkproxy · 4,817,504#25
@razcom · 1,240,284#26
@drtel · 770,187#27
@hamclasixii · 41#28
@akh_mam · 185,477#29
@vaarzesh_plus · 327,150#30
@bistodo · 392,078#31
@rapking · 306,607#32
@cryptoplusers · 489,838#33
@varzesh3 · 1,294,922#34
@lordcryptovip · 827,464#35
@EfshaKhabar · 276,379#36
@tabdealplatform · 525,341#37
@MemeHubOriginal · 99,349#38
@efshagari · 603,612#39
@SportBaadNews · 935,928#40
@Myporoxy · 4,487,728#41
@TweetyChannel · 785,953#42
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 956,313#43
@notcoins_drop · 7,118#44
@alonews · 940,371#45
@ARZ_PROXY · 1,560,621#46
@FutballBadBoys · 107,051#47
@MARIZMEDIA · 57,458#48
@chekhabarre · 246,501#49
@ir_javan · 634,122#50
@Churchill_Tahlil · 247,056#51
@Bad_Twitty · 889,347#52
@moodet_ba_man · 16#53
@tweet_Khabari · 647,219#54
@FUTBALLI18 · 488,214#55
@hip_hopi · 272,718#56
@bg_ae · 393,721#57
@RstCrypto · 396,964#58
@funhiphop · 226,234#59
@iran_efsha_news · 1,279,362#60
@nikotiinn_text · 459,005#61
@cheetahserver · 3,300#62
@raptv · 380,087#63
@BadCandom · 619,075#64
@RapGodNews · 175,163#65
@irproxy · 1,286,221#66
@ahangify · 4,224,139#67
@airdrop_iranixvip · 75,311#68
@dogs · 7,196,362#69
@notcoin · 8,864,784#70
@proxymtproto · 11,950,489#71
@heart_bright · 177,688#72
@RegaPlus · 1,463,288#73
@HipHopTweety · 201,455#74
@Realmadrid_we · 133,914#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Lomixvpn · 68,666
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 20 August 2026
@FlashUsdT_Vip · 126,977
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
@isubvpn · 187,040
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 12 August 2026
@spdnetVIP · 60,275
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 22 August 2026
@Mr_Twiitter · 45,016
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 27 August 2026
@vpn_naji · 154,354
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
@ofoq_iran · 86,393
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 17 August 2026
@chanelletel · 304,832
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 August 2026
@spdnet · 541,098
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
@resane_mardomy · 146,800
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
@roidbest · 1,653,865
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@ITSecurityComputer · 177,752
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@GameeRoid · 85,840
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@CryptoTacticians · 58,028
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
@PasserMobile01 · 65,316
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
@Farda_Ai · 758,964
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
@V2ry_Proxy · 330,647
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
@ultrasurf_12 · 131,574
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@CEngineer93 · 101,298
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@remixdepH · 281,897
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 August 2026
@SvnTeam · 546,202
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
@heart_bright · 177,688
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
@bg_ae · 393,721
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@vpnsal · 230,767
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی و تکنولوژی |موب سک” (@mobsec_ai), 491,760 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mobsec_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.