Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Академия Современной Психологии

Channel

Академия Современной Психологии

@modernpsyacademy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,408subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309952831
TypeChannel
Username@modernpsyacademy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/modernpsyacademy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,4087,4947,4516 August 2026 — 7,494 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,493 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,483 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,468 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,472 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,456 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,450 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,448 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,438 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,428 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,424 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,409 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,408 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,395–7,507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:417,408-1
14 Sept 2026, 14:007,409-15
11 Sept 2026, 03:577,424-4
6 Sept 2026, 12:017,428-10
1 Sept 2026, 17:547,438-10
29 Aug 2026, 15:037,448-2
26 Aug 2026, 21:037,450-6
23 Aug 2026, 13:227,456-16
19 Aug 2026, 14:047,472+4
16 Aug 2026, 15:067,468-15
13 Aug 2026, 02:287,483-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:517,485-8
6 Aug 2026, 20:417,493-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:487,494first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.64%
avg views ÷ 7,408 subscribers
Avg views / post
269
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held31 (1 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total808
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

330 reactions across 27 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10832.7%
🔥5015.2%
😁4313.0%
🥰3510.6%
🤣298.79%
❤‍🔥267.88%
👍154.55%
😍61.82%
😭61.82%
👏20.606%
🤔20.606%
10.303%
🆒10.303%
👎10.303%
🗿10.303%
😱10.303%
🤓10.303%
🤡10.303%
🤷‍♀10.303%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Зачем пришел клиент? Мы не знаем. И он не знает. Знает ОРКТ-терапевт. Рассказываем, как с помощью ОРКТ помочь вашему клиенту понять свой запрос. И приглашаем на наш ближайший курс по ОРКТ: https://clck.ru/3VVUEu

3

27 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC288 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Терапевты, которые работают в этом подходе, что бы вы добавили? Мы добавим, что у нас есть обучение IFS 💜 Все подробности о нем можно узнать на сайте: clck.ru/3VTzd6

2

26 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC350 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Материнство очень редко начинается с чистого листа 🌿 После рождения ребенка оказывается, что реальное материнство совсем не похоже на то, что мама себе представляла. Иногда вместе с ребёнком появляется ещё и ощущение, что нужно всё успевать, всё знать и всегда справляться. 🌿 Сегодня вместе с преподавателем курса по психотерапии матерей разбираем, откуда берутся представления о «хорошей матери» и почему иногда за ни

🔥4🥰3❤‍🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC257 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

ПРОГРАММА АНТИКРИЗИСНОЙ КОНФЫ ⚡️ До нашей бесплатной онлайн конференции осталось 3 дня — делимся с вами темами, чтобы вы заранее успели определиться с выступлениями, которые хотите послушать 💜 🔗 А если вы ещё не зарегистрировались на конфу, самое время сделать это прямо сейчас: https://clck.ru/3VJesV

6👍4🔥2🥰1

19 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC271 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

ОТКРЫТЫЕ ЗАНЯТИЯ ОТ ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЕЙ АСП ⚡️ Делимся ещё бесплатными уроками, которые пройдут на следующей неделе: 1️⃣ Психосоматика: как не растеряться, если клиент жалуется на симптомы, а не на эмоции — 25 августа, 18:00 Клиент приносит соматический диагноз от врача: учитывать, перенаправить или работать? Разберём, где в одном симптоме сходятся психика, тело и социальная ситуация. Что психологу делать на первой сес

4🔥3🥰1

18 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC342 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мы тут пришли с напоминанием, что новый поток Терапии внутренних семейных систем (IFS) стартует 7 сентября ⚡️ На курсе вы: ➡️ Освоите базовые концепции IFS Поймёте, как устроена система внутренних частей, научитесь выявлять протекторов, раненые части и Селф ➡️ Научитесь работать с частями клиента Будете использовать IFS как инструмент для эмоциональной регуляции, самосострадания и безопасного контакта с травмой.

4🥰3🤔2

17 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC466 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Ну а в связи с последними событиями вынуждены раскрыть правду, которую так долго от вас скрывали… Будьте как Канье, приходите на конфу: https://clck.ru/3VGJxR

🤣187🥰5👎1🤡1

17 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC455 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

💜 Партнер Антикризисной конфы — онлайн-центр терапии РПП, медиа и школа для РПП-информированных специалистов «Hungrie» РПП остаются одними из самых сложных направлений в работе психолога: здесь особенно важны точная диагностика, понимание специфики расстройства и практический опыт. 🔶 В Школе Hungrie — семинары, супервизии и разборы случаев с опытными специалистами. Там помогают психологам увереннее работать с РПП и

4🔥3😍2

16 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC484 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026

А вот и ответы! 1. Может ли терапевтка увидеть угнетение там, где клиентка его не переживает? Фемоптика — это не готовый ответ, который приносят в кабинет, а внимание к тому, что обычно остаётся невидимым. Она не предписывает клиентке, как читать её опыт, и не переопределяет его за неё — в том числе оставляет за ней право не считать что-либо угнетением. Навязанная интерпретация противоречит самой сути подхода, выро

7😁2

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC342 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

1. Может ли терапевтка начать видеть угнетение там, где клиентка сама его не переживает?

  1. Да88%
  2. Нет12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC358 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

2. Не получится ли так, что феминистская оптика сведёт всё страдание к гендеру, а травма, биология и семейная история останутся за кадром?

  1. Сведёт22%
  2. Не сведёт78%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC346 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

3. Не сводится ли феминистская оптика только к гендеру и не учитывает другие стороны опыта клиента?

  1. Сводится12%
  2. Не сводится88%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @modernpsyacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

1. Может ли терапевтка начать видеть угнетение там, где клиентка сама его не переживает?

  1. Да88%
  2. Нет12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll94 voters

2. Не получится ли так, что феминистская оптика сведёт всё страдание к гендеру, а травма, биология и семейная история останутся за кадром?

  1. Сведёт22%
  2. Не сведёт78%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll89 voters

3. Не сводится ли феминистская оптика только к гендеру и не учитывает другие стороны опыта клиента?

  1. Сводится12%
  2. Не сводится88%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll87 voters

4. Не отнимает ли фокус на социальных структурах у клиентки чувство контроля над собственной жизнью?

  1. Отнимает33%
  2. Не отнимает67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов
@spb_idpo · 27,586
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,817
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,398
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков
@pribytkov_psy · 40,070
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Академия Современной Психологии” (@modernpsyacademy), 7,408 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modernpsyacademy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.