Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مهاب السعيد

Channel

مهاب السعيد

@mohabsaeed90

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,952subscribers

-82 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272436088
TypeChannel
Username@mohabsaeed90
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mohabsaeed90

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,95216,03415,9936 August 2026 — 16,034 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,034 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,031 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,029 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,027 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,020 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,016 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,011 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,005 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,004 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,998 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,995 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,994 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,996 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,998 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,997 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,989 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,990 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,997 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,998 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,992 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,993 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,992 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,991 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,988 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,989 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,979 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,969 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,963 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,965 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,960 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,957 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,952 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,940–16,046 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:2015,952-5
17 Sept 2026, 02:5915,957-3
15 Sept 2026, 01:5815,960-5
13 Sept 2026, 10:3715,965+2
11 Sept 2026, 13:5615,963-6
8 Sept 2026, 20:4115,969-10
5 Sept 2026, 15:3915,979-10
3 Sept 2026, 13:1915,989+1
1 Sept 2026, 01:1815,988-3
31 Aug 2026, 03:3615,991-1
30 Aug 2026, 04:3415,992-1
29 Aug 2026, 07:0315,993+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:3415,992-6
27 Aug 2026, 01:3915,998+1
26 Aug 2026, 00:4115,997+7
24 Aug 2026, 23:2515,990+1
23 Aug 2026, 11:1615,989-8
22 Aug 2026, 01:0815,997-1
20 Aug 2026, 17:3815,998+2
19 Aug 2026, 15:0415,996first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 15,952 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held31 (26 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total32,390
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

في مثل هذا اليوم من أربع سنين أيام ما كنت مش (نسوي)

25 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈2,960 viewsread 3 September 2026

أنا صديق كريم حلمي، وده شيء أفخر بيه. لكنه أصبح في حياتي مؤخرًا مسمّى وظيفي كامل. فأنا لست طبيب عيون فقط، ولكني أيضًا صديق كريم حلمي. صار هدفًا من أهداف الحياة وصلتله وقعدت على ضفاف النيل أصطاد سمك بعد ما حققت ذاتي في الدنيا. حالة شعورية كاملة داخل فيها بقالي سنتين. عامل إيه دلوقتي يا مهاب؟ الحمد لله، صديق كريم حلمي شوية. الناس بتكلمني من كل حدب وصوب عشان أكلمه ياخدوا ثيرابي عنده. رسائل ال others تعج بمن يريدون كريم

24 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

الصفحة دي بتقعد تحط آيات وأحاديث وأقوال فقهاء وتدّعي أنها تهتم بنشر كيفية تكريم الإسلام للمرأة 👍🏻

23 Aug 2026, 02:10 UTC≈4,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

لمثل هذا مازلنا ندخل على فيسبوك

22 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC≈3,340 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

حامد الإدريسي، جهبذ الذكوريين، يقول هنا وبشكل صريح: لا يجوز أن تتعلم المرأة أكثر من القراءة والكتابة وشيئًا من القرآن. طيب. إنسان عقليته لم تصل حتى لجواز أن نطلق عليها (رجعية) احنا مالنا بيه؟ ما العالم مليء بمن هم كذلك. لكن في الحقيقة ده واحد مستشار أسري وتربوي، عنده أكاديمية كاملة اسمها تكامل، يصفونه بأنه مؤلف علم الأسرة، له ست كتب منشورة، عنده قرابة ٣٠٠ ألف متابع، وهو مقدس لدى الذكورية الإسلامية. بالتالي الأفكار ال

22 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈2,970 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://nashrstore.com/ar/p896174049-%D8%A3%D9%84%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%A9?fbclid=IwdGRjcAT18DRjbGNrBPXwJnBkb2YFZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEeoAuYk-NqFXG6AJrn-kDVAF0-bIXsrcxWmdMfo6rIfr4vc114HfvHkYtWTkY_aem_Yjt950_6Qs3IOE8kVqAUAw

22 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 3 September 2026

أو الشاعر المخضرم الذي أدرك الجاهلية والإسلام: سُويد بن أبي كاهل اليشكري، وهو يصف ابن المُكَعبَر أزرق العين باللؤم: لَقَد زَرِقَت عَيناكَ يا بنَ مُكَعبَرٍ.. كَما كُلُّ ضَبيٍّ مِنَ اللُّؤمِ أَزرَقُ تَرى اللُّؤمَ فيهِم لائِحاً في وُجوهِهِم.. كَما لاحَ في خَيلِ الحَلائِبِ أَبلَقُ كان العرب في الجاهلية ومن قبل الإسلام يعتبرون الزرقة في العين مرضًا فيها، لأنهم كانوا يرون بعض من تذهب أبصارهم تزرقّ أعينهم، لكن طبعًا لا تزر

22 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 3 September 2026

وكتبت بروفيسير التاريخ المعاصرة والمتخصصة في التاريخ الإسلامي من جامعة (فيرجينيا) كريستينا ريتشاردسون Kristina Richardson: "تقترح أعمالي الأرشيفية الأولية أن الكُتّاب المسلمين الذكور في العصور الوسطى قبلوا على نطاق واسع توصيف العيون الزرقاء والخضراء بكونها غير جذابة ومنحرفة". ونشرت في 2014 ورقة بحثية بعنوان: "العيون الزرقاء والخضراء في العصور الوسطى الإسلامية" Blue and Green Eyes in the Islamicate Middle Ages. نفس م

22 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,390 viewsread 3 September 2026

لم يتوقف الهوس البشري بلون العين، ربما صرنا أقل وحشية ولا نطعن الفتيات ذوات الاثني عشر عامًا في قلوبهن بحقن الكلوروفورم، ولكننا ننفق عالميًا على العدسات الملونة 3.8 - 4.2 مليار دولار سنويًا حسب إحصائية 2024-2025، ويزيد حجم سوقها بمعدل 9% سنويًا. هذا غير السوق الصاعد للعمليات الجراحية التجميلية لتغيير لون العين، مثل زرع القُزَحية الصناعية داخل العين Cosmetic Iris Implants، أو الليزر لتفتيح لون القُزَحية، أو حتى وشم ا

28 Jul 2026, 02:24 UTC≈5,680 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

أقول قولي هذا وأستغفر الله لي ولكم

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @mohabsaeed90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Islam khalaf
@IslamKhalaf · 85,393
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مهاب السعيد” (@mohabsaeed90), 15,952 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohabsaeed90.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.