Channel
@mohamadgad85
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,966subscribers
-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001321045408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mohamadgad85 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mohamadgad85 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 13,966 | -13 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 13,979 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 13,992 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 13,999 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 14,013 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 14,016 | -28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 14,044 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 14,047 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:25 | 14,051 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:29 | 14,054 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 14,064 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 14,069 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 14,061 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 14,063 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 14,071 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 14,075 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 14,087 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 14,085 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 14,087 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 14,088 | first reading |
149 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 149 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 20,892 |
| Reactions total | 390 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,850 reactions across 128 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,396 | 75.5% | |
| 👍 | 147 | 7.95% | |
| 💯 | 120 | 6.49% | |
| 😢 | 73 | 3.95% | |
| 😁 | 69 | 3.73% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 1.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 0.649% | |
| 🤷 | 4 | 0.216% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.216% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.108% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.054% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,850 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mohamadgad85. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 149 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
هذه امرأة عظيمة، وزوجة أصيلة؛ ليس لأنها خرجت تعمل وتحمل رضيعها لتساعد زوجها بعدما فقد عمله فحسب، بل لأنها لم تسمح لمثيري الفتن والمتاجرين بقضايا النساء أن يصنعوا لها بطولةً على حساب زوجها. حين ظن البعض أنه تركها تواجه الحياة وحدها، كان يمكنها أن تصمت وتحصد التعاطف، لكنها خرجت لترد غيبة زوجها وتحفظ عرضه فقالت: زوجي موجود ويتحمّل مسؤولية البيت، لكنه فقد عمله، فنزلت أساعده ولم يجبرني. رفضت تعاطفًا ثمنه إهانة زوجها؛ سا…
❤18
تحتاج أن تذكر نفسك في كل صباح أن الرزق ليس أموالًا فقط؛ بل من أجلِّ الرزق ونعم الله عليك أن ييسر على لسانك ذكره سبحانه. أن يهديك إلى التسبيح والتحميد، وأن يجري على لسانك الاستغفار والصلاة على النبي ﷺ، فهذه نعمة قد يعيش فيها الإنسان كل يوم، ولا ينتبه إلى عِظمها. فكم من إنسان يملك الوقت، ويملك اللسان، ويمضي يومه بين كلامٍ كثير، ثم لا يكون لله من لسانه إلا القليل! فالمسألة ليست في بساطة الكلمات أو سهولتها؛ إنما في ال…
❤13💯4👍1
قاوِم فراغك بما ينفع ، ولا تجعل برامج التواصل وغيرها ملاذك الوحيد في وحدتك فإن الفراغ باب بلاء ومفتاح كل فتنة.. قال الإمام ابن القيم : " من أعظم الأشياء ضرراً على العبد بطالته وفراغه، فإن النفس لاتقعد فارغة، بل إن لم يشغلها بما ينفعها شغلته بما يضره ولا بدّ ".
❤15👍1
نشر الدكتور نايف بن نهار قبل أيام منشورًا لافتًا عن المعيار الذي نختار به مَن ندخلهم إلى دوائرنا القريبة. والشاهد فيما ذكره أن الإنسان قد تعجبه في بعض الناس سعة علمهم، أو ذكاؤهم، أو حسن حديثهم، أو اجتهادهم في عملهم، لكن القرآن يضع أمامنا معيارًا يسبق هذه المزايا كلها، وهو الصدق: ﴿يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَكُونُوا مَعَ الصَّادِقِينَ﴾. فقد تنتفع بمزايا كثير من الناس، لكن عليك أت لا تُدخل إلى د…
❤17👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
البيوت في ضوء ما جاء في القرآن الكريم ليست ساحة صراع بين الرجل والمرأة على توزيع الأدوار، ولا مكانًا للتشابه ليكون كل واحد منهما نسخة من الآخر؛ إنما تقوم البيوت على أن يكون الرجل موطن الرعاية والسعي والإنفاق، وأن تكون المرأة موطن السكن الذي يأوي إليه الرجل وتطمئن به الأسرة. وحين يستقيم كل واحد منهما في موضعه الذي أراده الله له، تحف بهذا البيت السكينة والمودة والرحمة. لكننا حين نترك ما أراده الله، ونستورد للبيوت أفك…
❤14👍1
ما فاتك في الدنيا لن يفوتك في الجنة.. لما مات إبراهيم ابن رسول الله ﷺ، وكان لا يزال في سن الرضاع، قال النبي ﷺ: «إنَّ له مُرضِعًا في الجنة». قال العلماء: في هذا دليل على أن الله تعالى يُكمّل لأهل السعادة من عباده بعد موتهم ما كان ناقصًا لهم في الدنيا. معنى يسكب في القلب سكينة عجيبة.. فقد ينتهي عمر الإنسان قبل أن تكتمل له أشياء كثيرة، وقد يخرج من الدنيا وفي قلبه أمنيات لم يبلغها، ونِعَم لم يأخذ منها نصيبه، وأمور ان…
❤19💯7
لا يخفى على أحد ما شهدته السنوات الأخيرة من هجوم على الدين ومحاولات لهدم الثوابت في نفوس الناس. ومن أخطر وسائل هذا الهجوم أن يُترصَّد لعالم هفوة، أو لداعية زلة، ثم يُعمَّم خطؤه على الجميع؛ حتى ينتقل الناس من الاعتراض على شخص إلى التشكيك في العلماء جميعًا، ثم يجعلون هذا التشكيك مدخلًا للهجوم على ثوابت الدين. ولا يعني هذا أن العلماء لا يخطئون، أو أن كل من تصدّر للدعوة يُؤخذ عنه، لكن الخطأ يُردّ بقدره، ولا يتحول إلى و…
❤6
لم يعد سؤالي: ماذا أمسك الله عني؟ بل أصبحت أفتش أيضًا وابحث في ما حولي: ماذا فتح الله لي وسط هذه الأزمة؟ قد لا تسدد السكينة دَينًا، لكنها تمنع التفكير في الدَّين من أن يمتلك قلبك. وقد لا تكون هي كل الفرج الذي ترجوه، لكنها رحمة من رحمات الفرج الذي تنتظره؛ رحمة تسبق بعض صوره، وتحفظنا إلى أن يأتي ما قدّره الله منها. فحين تجد في قلبك هدوءًا وسكينة عكس ما أنت فيه من أزمة أو ضيق، إعلم أن الله لم يتركك بلا رزق؛ وإنما أرسل…
❤13💯1
مررت بأزمة منذ فترة، لكنني لمست أن قلبي لم يكن كالسابق؛ فهذه ليست المرة الأولى التي يضيق بي فيها الحال، لكن هذه المرة لم أجد القلق الذي أعرفه، ولم يصاحبني انشغال البال وكثرة التفكير وقت الأزمة، ولا قلة النوم والتوتر كما يحدث في كل مرة. نعم، هي الأزمة نفسها، وقد تكون هذه المرة أكبر، لكن هناك هدوء وسكينة في القلب؛ شعور لم أعرفه من قبل. ظللت مدة أتعامل مع هذه السكينة على أنها مجرد عون يعينني الله به إلى أن يأتي الرزق.…
❤7
يفتح المرء هاتفه، فتمر أمامه أرزاق الناس وبيوتهم وأسفارهم ونجاحاتهم؛ هذا يتفاخر بما يملك، وذاك يتباهى بما لا يملك، وبين صورة وأخرى قد يقع في صدره شيئًا من الحسد أو الضيق دون أن يشعر. ولهذا كان من تهذيب الإنسان لنفسه ألا يأمن على قلبه الفتنة، وأن يظل لسانه لاهجًا بهذا الدعاء النبوي: «واسلُلْ سخيمةَ قلبي». والسخيمة هي ما يعلق بالصدر من حقد وغل وحسد؛ فكأنك تسأل الله أن يصل التطهير إلى أعمق موضع فيك؛ إلى شعور لا يراه …
❤33👍3💯3
أنت أضعف مِن أن تحتمل الحياة دون وردك من الأذكار!
❤8💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @mohamadgad85. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mohamadgad85 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هل تستفيد من ملخص الـPdf و الانفوجرافيك التي نرسلها لمحتوى البودكاست
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمد جاد” (@mohamadgad85), 13,966 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohamadgad85.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.