Channel
@natash_a_gde
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,217subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001207304107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @natash_a_gde |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/natash_a_gde |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 2,217 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 2,218 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:49 | 2,224 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 2,228 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 2,229 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 2,228 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 2,227 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 2,229 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 2,233 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,235 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 2,235 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
110 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 28.2% | |
| 🤓 | 8 | 7.27% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наташ, как дела? Дела такие, что у моей собаки ярковыраженный пастуший инстинкт, а муж завел пасеку. Так что теперь по выходным мы пасем овец, сортируем произведенный нашими пчелами мед, приносим на вечеринки медовые рамки в качестве гостинцев и проводим дегустации 🐝 Вот ведь прониклись мы близостью к природе, и жизнь сделала поворот на 180! Словила себя на обратной профдеформации: мы как мед порционировали — у м…
❤22
Рассказываю про свежий кейс! С прошлого лета работали над масштабным ребрендингом крупного производственного бизнеса из Санкт-Петербурга, который работает со сложными B2B-задачами, промышленными заказами и известными федеральными брендами. Мои фото в забавной шапочке, командировки в город, где прошло все мое студенчество и выданные вам мной наблюдения в процесе// b2b материалы, сайт и рассылка на итальянском, о ток…
❤8🔥6
Ситуация в этот вторник: сижу работаю, открываю телегу, новых сообщений — 0. Думаю, как хорошо, могу спокойно презентацию дособрать, не надо ни на что отвлекаться. А у меня оказывается и интернет отключился и впн слетел😅
🤓8❤7🔥2
Работая с предпринимателями и топами, я часто возвращаюсь в мысли о том, что какой бы ни была сложной воронка, стратегия или структура сделки.. на другой стороне всегда человек. В B2B — человек. За продуктом на полке тоже! У всех свои мысли, своя логика, свои страхи и свои приколы. А еще мы с вами живем в золотое время, когда все выше перечисленное талантливые люди могут упаковать в свой канал, а мы с вами наблюдат…
🔥4❤2❤🔥1
Про реакцию на изменения и хейт, ну чуть-чуть Я пару раз слышала, что блогеров принято считать людьми, которые не боятся хейта: вышел в интернет — будь готов, что тебя разберут по косточкам, и не в самых приятных выражениях расскажут, как тебе надо жить. И стоит отметить, за несколько лет ведения блога я едва ли встречалась с чем-то подобным. Но вот в своей основной работе постоянно! Потому что я работаю с изменен…
❤11🔥1🤩1
Случился со мной Петербург командировочный! А там — очень понравившаяся мне витрина магазина обручальных колец Вокруг пальца с вдохновляющим слоганом «кто ищет, тот найдет». Вау! И солнце в Петербурге тоже вау!
🔥14❤8
#ребят_а_в_чем_вау Сегодня в моей рубрике очень лаконичный и очень точный разговор о том, как делать вау-продукт с основательницей бренда свечей арт-объектов nōtem Алёной Хайдуковой. Гарантировано вы видели творения ее рук головы и ее команды, в этом канале так точно (здесь и здесь) и в миллионе других кейс и маркетинг-каналов — свечи-багеты, сливочное масло, коллаборации с Самокатом и Яндекс-лавкой. Я просила ее,…
❤8🔥4💔3
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @natash_a_gde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наташ, а где вау?” (@natash_a_gde), 2,217 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natash_a_gde.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.