Channel
@nexta_tv
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
103,275subscribers
-1,063 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001243038268 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nexta_tv |
| Description | Новости, аналитика, инсайды о Беларуси. Прислать информацию: @nextamail_bot / [email protected] Реклама и сотрудничество: @nexta_reklama / [email protected] In English: https://x.com/nexta_tv Новости мира: @nexta_live Помочь нам: nexta.tv/support |
| Created | 19 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nexta_tv |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
106,000 average views per post against 103,275 subscribers — an engagement rate of 103.1%. Across the 2,426 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,025–315,892 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.42% and 21.7%, with a median of 10.0%.
| Window | 30 days (11 August 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 51 of 51 published in the window (0 exact, 51 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 5,427,940 |
| Mature posts only | 105.0% over 50 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 103,275 measured 8 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:rus · 2,426 channels · p10 2.06% · p25 4.42% · p50 10.0% · p75 21.7% · p90 36.2% |
| Position in cohort | 99.711th percentile · 10.3× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.281% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 103,275 | -136 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 103,411 | -72 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 103,483 | -42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:08 | 103,525 | -41 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 103,566 | -33 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 103,599 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 103,615 | -29 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 103,644 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 103,677 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 103,706 | -25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:39 | 103,731 | -38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 103,769 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 103,787 | -21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 103,808 | -43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 103,851 | -38 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 103,889 | -36 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 103,925 | -43 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 103,968 | -39 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 104,007 | -47 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 104,054 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (28 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,226,940 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 05:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Андрей Почобут вернулся в Гродно — задержат ли его снова? Бывший посол Польши считает, что Лукашенко сейчас не хочет портить отношения с администрацией Трампа, поэтому Почобут мог получить неофициальные гарантии, что его не тронут. Впрочем, риск задержания остаётся. Мариуш Машкевич предупреждает, что поездка в любом случае несёт риски. Ведь нынешнее освобождение — скорее результат давления США, а не смены курса ре…
В Беларуси Почобут планирует пробыть неделю В Гродно экс-политзаключённый намерен встретиться с семьёй и соратниками из Союза поляков Беларуси. В марте 2021 года Почобута задержали в Гродно, а в феврале 2023-го приговорили к восьми годам колонии по обвинениям в «разжигании вражды» и «призывах к действиям, направленным на причинение вреда национальной безопасности». Среди оснований для преследования были его публика…
⚡️ Анджей Почобут вернулся в Беларусь Бывший политзаключённый пересёк польско-белорусскую границу и направился в сторону Гродно. Об этом сообщает Gazeta Wyborcza.
❤️ «В автобусе лучше не открывать рот»: что происходит с украинцами в Польше? В 2022 году поляки открыто принимали тысячи людей, спасающихся от войны. Однако спустя четыре года ситуация заметно изменилась. В эксклюзивном репортаже NEXTA мы разбираем, почему украинцы в Польше начали чувствовать себя в опасности и что происходит с теми, кто ищет убежище. Смотрите по ссылке: https://youtu.be/XUH2IhyU9u0
🥁 Амстердам загремит в поддержку белорусских политзаключённых — всех желающих зовут в уникальный звуковой перформанс 19 сентября на арт-острове NDSM Wharf в Амстердаме 1200 человек создадут один огромный коллективный звук в рамках проекта художника Максима Тыминко A Percussion Piece. Каждый участник принесёт простой предмет, который может издавать шум, и наденет картонную маску с портретом реального белорусского по…
🦅 Польша подняла тревогу из-за объекта со стороны Беларуси. Объект оказался стаей птиц Днём 6 сентября польские военные заметили на радарах подозрительный сигнал, который двигался со стороны Беларуси. Проверять потенциального нарушителя отправили военный вертолёт. Через некоторое время выяснилось, что нарушитель был пернатый: радары поймали большую стаю птиц. Белорусское вторжение отменяется.
😬 Кого только не встретишь на полумарафоне в Минске
Россиянин напал на ребёнка в Беларуси В Смолевичах неадекватный мужчина подошёл к группе школьников на детской площадке. Он дёрнул одного из них за руку, из-за чего тот упал, а затем ударил шестиклассника по голове и ушёл. Нападавшего задержали. Им оказался гражданин РФ, временно находящийся в Беларуси. Против него возбудили уголовное дело о хулиганстве.
В Беларуси осудили на 16 лет молодого таможенника 26-летнего Петра Осипенко из Минска осудили по трём политическим статьям — об участии в протестах, оскорблении Лукашенко и измене государству. Суд назначил ему 16 лет колонии усиленного режима. Сейчас Осипенко остаётся в СИЗО КГБ. Правозащитники признали его политзаключённым.
🎾 Соболенко вышла из себя после вопроса на пресс-конференции о «вечеринках и развлечениях» Первая ракетка мира крайне резко отреагировала на замечание журналиста о том, что перед US Open «было много вечеринок, развлечений и всего такого». «Вы, ребята, просто смешные. Что это вообще за вопрос?» — возмутилась теннисистка. «Вы думаете, что я тусовалась, а не тренировалась?» — добавила Арина и прервала дискуссию. Бел…
🇰🇿 Казахстан закрывается от россиян и белорусов С 30 ноября за въезд в страну на авто придётся платить — понадобится электронное разрешение QazETA стоимостью около 15 у. е. по курсу. С 15 декабря электронное разрешение потребуется всем, независимо от транспорта: поезд, паром, автомобиль — без ETA не пустят. Забавно, что безвиз канул в прошлое почти в тот же день, когда на саммите ШОС в Бишкеке Токаев расшаркивался…
Блогеров привезли на Володарку В 2020-м эта фраза звучала иначе. А сейчас, шесть лет спустя, беспринципные «лидеры мнений» пиарят харчевню на костях. Пользователей Threads возмутила циничная реклама: на территорию Пищаловского замка в Минске, известного в народе как Володарка, высадился десант провластных агроблогеров. Все как один начали рассказывать, как будет круто, когда после реконструкции здесь откроется каф…
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @nexta_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Nexta |
|---|---|
| Description | Belarusian mass media |
| X / Twitter | @nexta_tv |
| YouTube | UCY_q9S5SOsIRZNUVrmHB1JQ |
| Official site | https://nexta.tv/ |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
7 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Hacker News
This handle was named 2 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEXTA” (@nexta_tv), 103,275 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nexta_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.