Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Уфимский визионер

Channel

Уфимский визионер

@nonhistory

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,394subscribers

+458 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002120545127
TypeChannel
Username@nonhistory
Created23 January 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nonhistory

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@nonhistory/1214 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC@bashgambit/128631 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC1.0053 minutes
@bashgambit/12902 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC@nonhistory/1215 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC1.0050 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bashgambit8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.6 hoursthis entry (53)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @nonhistory — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8751,4021,138.56 August 2026 — 936 subscribers6 August 2026 — 936 subscribers12 August 2026 — 919 subscribers20 August 2026 — 875 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,401 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,402 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,387 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,390 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,393 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,391 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,394 subscribers1,3946 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 44 days, net +458. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 796–1,481 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:221,394+3
13 Sept 2026, 22:201,391-2
10 Sept 2026, 14:591,393+3
5 Sept 2026, 15:421,390+3
1 Sept 2026, 13:061,387-15
29 Aug 2026, 21:581,402+1
26 Aug 2026, 22:261,401+526
20 Aug 2026, 01:44875-44
12 Aug 2026, 22:53919-17
6 Aug 2026, 13:52936no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:21936first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥375.0%
👍125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC314 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlekseyMukhin

Не секрет, что в условиях СВО большую актуальность приобретают высокотехнологичные беспилотные системы. Это одно из самых перспективных направлений для военной отрасли и гражданского сектора России. И здесь в первую очередь важно готовить профессиональные кадры, которые помогут приблизить Победу. Деятельное участие в этом проявляет, например, Башкирия, которая в рейтинге Центра политической информации входит в топ-3

4 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 6 August 2026

Радий Хабиров стал 7-м в Рейтинге активности глав регионов в социальных сетях за период 27 июля - 2 августа 2026 года от АПЭК Несмотря на отпуск Глава Башкортостана сохранял активность в социальных сетях, что положительно отразилось на его позициях в еженедельном рейтинге Агентства политических и экономических коммуникаций. Основными темами публикаций Радия Хабирова стали реализация проекта Евразийского музея кочев

3 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC335 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bashgambit

Оперативка Хабирова: вручение медали Шаймуратова герою СВО, скандал с гаражами для судей, Спартакиада народов России и поручения Минздраву республики Сегодня на оперативном совещании глава вручил медаль генерала Шаймуратова командиру батальона — Герою России, жёстко раскритиковал мэрию Уфы за использование муниципальных машин для перевозки судей в Татарстан. Также Хабиров предложил организовать медобследование для

2 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC784 viewsread 6 August 2026

При всех признанных и пока ещё не признанных "заслугах" Ратмир Мавлиев, конечно, далеко не Билл Клинтон, и не потому, что Уфа - не Соединённые Штаты Америки и даже не потому, что Моника Левински всё-таки была официально трудоустроена в Белом Доме в отличие от спунтиц экс-мэра Уфы. Мавлеев моложе и менее опытнее Билла Клинтона. Привыкший благодаря отцу получать всё и сразу, и не нести никакой ответственности, он не п

2 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC339 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yalalov

«Моника Левински» как-то совсем неожиданно врывается в башкирскую политику с некоторой разницей: темперамент, место и лица, оказывающие услуги Биллу и Радмиру, всё-таки имели между собой стилистические различия. Если в первом случае это был Президент и его служебный роман в Белом доме, то во втором, как обнюханный гопник базы отдыха, апартаменты, деньги и откровенные шлюхи... Ну что тут сказать, мания преследовани

🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC333 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @urta102Photo

Ратмир Мавлиев сравнил себя с Биллом Клинтоном, комментируя свой секс-скандал. Бывший мэр Уфы прокололся в личных непорочных связях в интервью каналу Mash_batash, кои ранее категорично отрицал. Параллель с экс-президентом США — любителем множества женщин, провел не моргнув: политик тоже сначала отнекивался от игрищ в коридорах Белого дома с Моникой Левински, но в конце концов связь признал публично. Ратмир, похоже,

🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 6 August 2026

Радий Хабиров стабилен на Бирже губернаторов по итогам июля Эксперты ПолитБрокера фиксируют его как одного из устойчивых региональных руководителей, что свидетельствует о сохранении политического баланса в Башкортостане накануне выборов и уверенном контроле Главой РБ ключевых процессов в республике

31 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC91 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @DeputatZhuravlevPhoto

🔥 Во время прошлой поездки в Нефтекамск успел плотно пообщаться с жителями города. Кроме стандартных городских проблем, мы говорили о коррупционном влиянии олигархического клана Мавлиевых на все сферы городской жизни и социально-экономического развития Нефтекамска. Так, в мой адрес обратились неравнодушные горожане, которых долгие годы беспокоит тема захвата Рафилом Мавлиевым территории центрального городского парк

31 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC337 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @politolog_Orlov

Башкортостан: системное присутствие в федеральной образовательной повестке как управленческий ресурс 🔺Аналитика АПЭК ◾️Часть 1 Участие главы Республики Башкортостан Радия Хабирова в подкасте Минобрнауки России «Высший пилотаж» стало знаковым событием. Хабиров оказался единственным главой региона среди участников проекта — и это не случайность, а осознанное позиционирование Башкортостана как одного из ключевых науч

31 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC340 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @politolog_Orlov

Башкортостан: системное присутствие в федеральной образовательной повестке как управленческий ресурс 🔺Аналитика АПЭК ◾️Часть 2 Передовые инженерные школы: реальный технологический суверенитет. В Башкортостане действует передовая инженерная школа (ПИШ) на базе Уфимского государственного авиационного технического университета (входит в Евразийский НОЦ). Школа «Моторы будущего» решает глобальную научно-техническую за

30 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC≈2,040 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Республика Башкортостан - в топ-3 Рейтинга устойчивости социально-экономического положения субъектов РФ в первой половине 2026 г. Центр развития региональной политики представил доклад "Социально-экономическое положение российских регионов в первой половине 2026 года: уровень устойчивости и основные тенденции". Авторы отмечают, что положение регионов определялось сочетанием негативных факторов (высокая ставка, паде

👍1

29 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC365 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, у и.о. мэра Уфы Рустама Шарипова сегодня День рождения. Ему исполнилось 44 года. Поздравляем 🍻

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nonhistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Башкирский домовой
@vashbashdomovoy · 43,704
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 28 August 2026
Радий Хабиров
@radiyhabirov · 34,860
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
E_Bash_news
@e_bash_news · 41,552
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Уфимский визионер” (@nonhistory), 1,394 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nonhistory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.