Video message, posted without a caption

Channel
НЮБЕРГ
@nybergdm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,895subscribers
+186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001106522199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nybergdm |
| Created | 13 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nybergdm |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 19,895 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 19,901 | +42 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 19,859 | +176 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 19,683 | +21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:45 | 19,662 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 19,666 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 19,677 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 19,671 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 19,666 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 19,673 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 19,682 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 19,674 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 19,676 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 19,677 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 19,685 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 19,683 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 19,686 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 19,697 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 19,702 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 19,691 | first reading |
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 44.1%
- avg views ÷ 19,895 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,780
- 97 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 99
- of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 851,349 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 48s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.50%
- 2 of 133 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 8,190
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 9,190
- over 129 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
ЧТО ОН НЕСЁТ?! Путин про касаток, мобилизацию и Зеленского Разогрев пошёл: ТВИЧ ЮТУБ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Хрестоматийная история из Детроита. Там есть маленький городок Хамтрамк на 28 тысяч жителей. Из-за богатой польской традиции его даже называли «Маленькой Варшавой». За последние 10 лет город сильно изменился: туда приехало множество мигрантов из Йемена и Бангладеша. На вывесках мэрии рядом с английским появились арабский и бенгальский языки, открылось множество мечетей. Как итог, мэром города стал мигрант из Йемена…
Ёбнутая бабень вышла на Таймс-сквер и пырнула ножом двух случайных прохожих. Одна из жертв оказалась вице-президентом Bank of America и скончалась. Полицейские, прибыв на место, потребовали бросить оружие, после этого попытались применить электрошокеры, которые оказались бессильны против жирового бронежилета. Когда убийца продолжила движение в сторону полиции с ножом, ей резко повысили содержание свинца в организме…
🔥МИР ГОРИТ (НЕТОРОПЛИВО), ПРЕЗИДЕНТЫ США https://www.twitch.tv/nybergdm
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
В память о Долли Партон вчера Терминал Тауэр в Кливленде осветили её фирменным розовым цветом. То же самое сделали на Эмпайр Стэйт Билдинг в Нью-Йорке
вот и думайте.
Сегодняшний #тирлист ВООБЩЕ БЕЗ ГОВНА!
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @nybergdm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@nybergdm edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Loqiemeantg · 39,436
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
@norimyxxxo · 154,609
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@pyrokinesistg · 142,859
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@che_d_e · 37,666
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@fly_high_meow · 36,742
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЮБЕРГ” (@nybergdm), 19,895 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nybergdm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.