Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Блог Акушеров

Channel

Блог Акушеров

@obgynblog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,757subscribers

-157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001310262453
TypeChannel
Username@obgynblog
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/obgynblog

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,75715,91415,835.56 August 2026 — 15,914 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,911 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,904 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,900 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,882 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,879 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,880 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,868 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,853 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,843 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,840 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,833 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,828 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,817 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,818 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,815 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,813 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,814 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,809 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,807 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,803 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,796 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,789 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,786 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,776 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,777 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,771 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,766 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,757 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 44 days, net -157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,733–15,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:2015,757-9
16 Sept 2026, 19:0215,766-5
14 Sept 2026, 22:5815,771-6
13 Sept 2026, 08:3815,777+1
11 Sept 2026, 13:1915,776-10
8 Sept 2026, 20:3915,786-3
5 Sept 2026, 10:1715,789-7
3 Sept 2026, 16:2015,796-7
2 Sept 2026, 05:4315,803-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:1515,807-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:0415,809-5
30 Aug 2026, 10:1315,814+1
28 Aug 2026, 08:5315,813-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:2615,815-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:4415,818+1
23 Aug 2026, 23:2715,817-11
20 Aug 2026, 00:3415,828-5
19 Aug 2026, 00:0215,833-7
17 Aug 2026, 20:2615,840-3
16 Aug 2026, 16:2815,843first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.89%
avg views ÷ 15,757 subscribers
Avg views / post
613
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held55 (21 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total10,420
Reactions total196
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27m 14s
Average length
2m 29s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

687 reactions across 52 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28040.8%
🔥20630.0%
👍14020.4%
😭314.51%
💩172.47%
🎉71.02%
👎60.873%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 687 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC229 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Врачи педиатрической службы Нового Уренгоя спасли новорожденную с экстремально низкой массой тела — 630 граммов. Алия Абдуллаева родилась на 25-й неделе беременности, примерно в 6 месяцев. Почти 2 месяца она провела в реанимации перинатального центра, затем еще 3 недели — в федеральной клинике Санкт-Петербурга, после чего 60 дней находилась в отделении патологии новорожденных и недоношенных детей в Новом Уренгое. У

9🔥2👍1

3 Sept 2026, 03:00 UTC334 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Кесарево сечение — на подиуме На конкурсе «Мисс Мира — 2026» представительница Уганды вышла в платье с неожиданной для высокой моды идеей — его посвятили кесареву сечению. Платье получило название «Слои жизни». Дизайнер Киша Абдалла вдохновилась анатомией операции и собственным опытом материнства. Семь цветовых слоёв платья символизируют путь от кожи и подкожной клетчатки до матки и плодных оболочек. Светлые перси

🔥134👍2

2 Sept 2026, 05:28 UTC508 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔞Секс без желания. Ученые из США проанализировали данные нескольких исследований препаратов для лечения сниженного сексуального желания и обнаружили парадокс: женщины, участвовавшие в исследованиях из-за выраженного отсутствия интереса к сексу, тем не менее продолжали регулярно вступать в сексуальные отношения с партнерами. Речь идет о гипоактивном расстройстве сексуального желания (ГРСЗ, или HSDD) — состоянии, при

🔥72👍1

1 Sept 2026, 02:27 UTC553 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⭐️Прогулки беременных связаны со снижением риска развития диабета 2 типа после гестационного. Ученые из США провели исследование среди 12 403 женщин с гестационным диабетом, родивших в 2009–2011 годах в Нью-Йорке, и сравнили заболеваемость диабетом 2 типа в разных районах города. Женщин, у которых диабет был выявлен еще до беременности, в исследование не включали. 🎉Результаты:🎉 🟡За 12 лет наблюдения диабет 2 типа

3🔥2👍1

31 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC620 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Растет процент женщин, никогда не проходивших скрининг на рак шейки матки. Ученые из США изучили данные Национального опроса состояния здоровья (NHIS) за 2005–2023 годы. 〰️Результаты:〰️ 🔵Среди женщин в возрасте 21–29 лет доля тех, кто никогда не проходил скрининг на рак шейки матки, увеличилась с 12,5% (3,5 млн) в 2005 году до 31,9% (6,2 млн) в 2023 году. 🔵Среди женщин в возрасте 30–65 лет показатель также вырос

2🔥2👍1

30 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC569 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Современное оборудование для родильных домов и перинатальных центров поступает в регионы России. Одним из приоритетов национального проекта «Семья» является повышение доступности многопрофильной медицинской помощи в родильных домах, перинатальных центрах и детских больницах. Для этого медицинские организации оснащают современным оборудованием, которое должно помогать врачам проводить раннюю диагностику, профилактику

🔥53👍3

29 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC502 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ogbstoriesPhoto

Резиновые тапки за $135. Что могло пойти не так? 😁 Наткнулся на Calzuro и сначала примерно так и подумал. А потом оказалось, что это довольно интересная медицинская история. Calzuro придумали в Италии ещё в 1983 году специально для врачей — нужна была обувь, которую можно нормально отмыть, продезинфицировать и даже засунуть в автоклав при 134 °C. Поэтому это не совсем «резина»: специальный полимер, цельнолитая кон

5👍4🔥4

29 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC494 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Мы часто рассказываем о наследственных заболеваниях, поэтому сегодня поподробнее рассмотрим типы этого самого наследования*. Источник: Cor Medicale. 📲MAX *На 9:20 — ошибка в решетке Пеннета.

2👍1🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 03:25 UTC615 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

История Линдси Клэнси — важное напоминание о необходимости своевременной диагностики и правильного лечения послеродовых расстройств психики. ❗️Далее будут описываться тяжелые и эмоционально травмирующие детали, поэтому впечатлительным читателям рекомендуем пролистнуть этот пост. В 2023 году мать троих детей и медсестра родильного отделения задушила своих двух сыновей и дочь, после чего попыталась покончить с собой,

😭95🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @obgynblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Злой доктор Филатов
@doc_Filatov · 28,121
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Немедицина
@ybody · 40,797
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 29 August 2026
Школа мам
@mom_school · 26,969
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блог Акушеров” (@obgynblog), 15,757 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obgynblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.