Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for only love

Channel

only love

@onlelovs

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,737subscribers

-470 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153775361
TypeChannel
Username@onlelovs
Descriptionв правильных глазах ты всегда будешь искусством
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/onlelovs

Growth

25,73726,20725,9727 August 2026 — 26,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,197 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,203 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,174 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,146 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,134 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,101 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,092 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,073 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,053 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,022 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,990 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,970 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,971 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,927 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,906 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,896 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,855 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,843 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,799 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,796 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,791 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,777 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,764 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,737 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 27 days, net -470. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,667–26,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:4625,737-27
2 Sept 2026, 03:5625,764-13
1 Sept 2026, 05:5825,777-14
31 Aug 2026, 09:0525,791-5
30 Aug 2026, 12:3825,796-3
29 Aug 2026, 12:5325,799-44
28 Aug 2026, 09:1625,843-12
27 Aug 2026, 08:1325,855-41
26 Aug 2026, 07:0625,896-10
25 Aug 2026, 05:4825,906-21
24 Aug 2026, 04:4325,927-44
22 Aug 2026, 13:2225,971+1
21 Aug 2026, 07:0425,970-20
20 Aug 2026, 09:5225,990-32
19 Aug 2026, 11:3326,022-31
18 Aug 2026, 09:4526,053-20
17 Aug 2026, 10:1826,073-19
15 Aug 2026, 18:5626,092-9
14 Aug 2026, 07:3726,101-33
13 Aug 2026, 02:1426,134first reading

Engagement

375 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.09%
avg views ÷ 25,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
794
375 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
375
of 375 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 375 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held375 (6 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total297,799
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,650
Videos
286
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 35s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 375 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onlelovs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 375 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC287 viewsread 3 September 2026

на самом деле, если с жинкой поймать общий вайб, в этом мире ничего больше не нужно..

2 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC643 viewsread 3 September 2026

мудрый понимает, что агрессия другого человека-это его просьба о любви.

2 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC628 viewsread 3 September 2026

позабыл и пролистал те места, где звезда нас с тобой к нашей мечте вела.

2 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC658 viewsread 3 September 2026

а сердце твоё, пережившее столько воин, переживет и эту войну.

2 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC755 viewsread 3 September 2026

единственным верным спутником остаётся одиночество.

2 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTC787 viewsread 3 September 2026

что есть печальней человека, который живет ради похвалы других?)

2 Sept 2026, 09:14 UTC843 viewsread 3 September 2026

странно осознавать, что те люди, которые называются близкими, не замечают твою боль.

Showing the 12 most recent of 375 posts we hold for @onlelovs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

кто-то смотрит?

  1. да59%
  2. нет41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

создать бота, куда будете отправлять свои мысли и идеи, а я буду выкладывать ?

  1. да96%
  2. нет4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

стоит открывать интернет-магазин?

  1. да73%
  2. нет27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

скинуть остальные ?

  1. да78%
  2. нет22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTCAnonymous Poll66 voters

у вас когда нибудь было такое, что вы настолько разочарованы, что начинаете смеяться?

  1. да94%
  2. нет6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 375 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

чувство верности
@wthlvan · 67,081
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 August 2026
vseonas
@vseonas99 · 59,384
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 22 August 2026
Новости • Электросталь • Ногинск
@StalNog_news · 36,077
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 1 September 2026
Идеи для фото | пранка
@Fotkioboiie · 55,706
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 23 August 2026
ТРЕШ ВИДЕО | НОВОСТИ 18+
@izrailvoina1 · 533,051
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 9 August 2026
Подкаты.
@podkaadttsss · 139,699
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 August 2026
The end.
@fory7o · 81,066
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
333 new love
@newlovechanell · 50,342
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
only eysś
@onIyeyss · 40,225
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
vseotebe
@vseotebe99 · 37,877
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
и дико мне
@asyassoul · 79,387
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
⚜ Переходник ⚜
@my_mytishchi · 58
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
любовь – это
@love_is_dp · 34,077
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
ab.soull
@absoulluve · 142,596
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
Кусочек счастья 🤍
@happiness00_0 · 121,888
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
арабские цитаты
@iloveeyoustill · 77,941
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
лейли нурани
@leylinurani · 46,728
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“only love” (@onlelovs), 25,737 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlelovs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.