Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дмитрий Орлов. Врач-сексолог 🔞

Channel

Дмитрий Орлов. Врач-сексолог 🔞

@orlovsex

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,245subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001838524454
TypeChannel
Username@orlovsex
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/orlovsex

Growth

2,2272,2482,237.56 August 2026 — 2,244 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,244 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,245 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,248 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,237 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,234 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,232 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,229 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,227 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,231 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,246 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,245 subscribers2,2456 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,224–2,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 10:422,245-1
4 Sept 2026, 10:172,246+15
1 Sept 2026, 02:182,231+4
28 Aug 2026, 23:592,227-2
25 Aug 2026, 15:332,229-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:172,232-2
19 Aug 2026, 08:232,234-3
16 Aug 2026, 06:032,237-5
12 Aug 2026, 17:062,242-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:422,248+3
6 Aug 2026, 14:422,245+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:022,244no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:482,244first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,146 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
60853.1%
💔12911.3%
🔥776.72%
🕊484.19%
💯433.75%
👍413.58%
😢282.44%
🤗201.75%
🙏181.57%
161.40%
🥰151.31%
🤝141.22%
❤‍🔥131.13%
🤔121.05%
👀100.873%
🦄80.698%
👌60.524%
💋60.524%
😇60.524%
👏50.436%
9 further kinds232.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @orlovsex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC654 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Совсем скоро пройдет конференция с моим участием. Также очень интересные доклады и темы выступления моих коллег. Все буду рад видеть и пообщаться

13🕊1🥰1😇1

28 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC675 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sex_therapy_gildiaPhoto

Продолжаем знакомить вас с спикер_ками конференции «Сексуальность и психическое здоровье», которая пройдет 8 августа Сегодня представляем экспертов круглого стола «Кому “принадлежит” сексуальность клиента?» Мы поговорим о том, как разные специалисты принимают решения, связанные с сексуальностью клиента, как выстраивается междисциплинарное взаимодействие и как не упускать важные аспекты сексуальности в работе с клие

19🥰4🕊2👍1🤗1

20 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,150 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Небольшая история о том, как меня пригласили поучаствовать в написании сценария о Советских Сексологах https://youtu.be/WhBM4VV8iyU

19🥰5🕊4🦄2🤔1

29 Jun 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,990 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Попались сразу два видео с попытками объяснить причину сексуальной ориентации и предпочтений. В первом гомосексуальность объясняется «слиянием с матерью». Коротко: мать настолько переключает на себя сексуальность мальчика, что в дальнейшем сексуальное влечение к женщинам становится для него бессознательным «предательством» матери. В итоге мать виновата в том, что не смогла насытиться частью, а забрала всё. Во втором

56👍10💯6🕊3🔥2😇1

19 Jun 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,440 views38 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Суррогатное партнёрство — очень противоречивый вид секс-терапии. Это привело к тому, что во многих странах оно запрещено. Однако сама идея реализовывалась в концепте медицинской реабилитации людей, чья сексуальная функция изменилась в результате травмы или заболевания. И в нашей стране это легально, так как является частью процесса восстановления организма. В подкасте я расскажу о том, почему классический вариант

23🔥6🤔5👀3🕊1

18 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,870 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мои комментарии о пирсинге и татуировках для Т-Ж https://t-j.ru/vopros-vrachu-modifikacii-tela-i-psihicheskoe-zdorovye/

27👌6👍4🔥1🕊1🤔1🤝1

13 Jun 2026, 06:36 UTC≈2,250 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно я полетал на параплане. Незабываемый опыт, который я планирую повторить. А началось все с идеи подарить дочери на день рождения такое приключение. В итоге: сначала полетел я, потом дочь, а когда мы оба приземлились мой сын тоже сказал, что он хочет отправиться в полет. Если вам интересно как все это прошло, то можно посмотреть видео. А в описании к нему - как именно работает техника экспозиции в психотерапии.

35❤‍🔥13🕊6🥰4🤗1

31 May 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,480 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/ZZoGoFCCf_U?si=Z3rB24fmPtfadrzR

18🔥8🕊2🤝2🤗1

28 May 2026, 10:10 UTC≈2,400 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вчера у нас с @cbtclinic начался курс «клиническая сексология» а это видео на вечную тему и современные технологии

29🔥10😁3🕊2😇2🖕1🤗1

27 May 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,140 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На съезде психиатров было очень много ценного от ведущих мировых экспертов и профессионалов своего дела. Мне кажется это намного важнее того, что привлекло медиа шум. В этом нет ничего нового и не надо приписывать эти заявления всему съезду. Спасибо коллегам, которые развивают науку и благодаря которым люди могут найти достойную помощь.

85💯13🙏11🕊8🔥1🖕1🤗1🤝1

18 May 2026, 20:00 UTC≈3,360 views169 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Инициатива плохая и бессмысленная. 1. В России и так возможно вступить в брак даже до 16 лет в исключительных случаях. Этот возраст устанавливается каждым регионом отдельно. Сейчас самый низкий — 14 лет (вы знали?). 2. Такая инициатива не принесет равноправия в браке, а наоборот усилит зависимость женщины от мужчины. Ведь не мальчикам хотят дать возможность раньше поставить штамп в паспорте, а именно девочку использо

💔98😢2820💯17🤝2🤷‍♀2🕊1🖕1

9 May 2026, 14:47 UTC≈2,350 views83 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В продолжение темы веб-кам индустрии Всего за несколько лет сервис OnlyFans превратился из нишевого приложения в отдельный феномен цифровой культуры. Огромное количество людей прошло через этот сервис по обе стороны экрана. В чем его суть? Это не просто «порно по подписке», а уникальный феномен, который объединил в себе функции: • социальной сети • секс-работы • стриминга • монетизации личности • продажи близости

💔3127👍13💯7🕊2🤝21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @orlovsex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,768
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дмитрий Орлов. Врач-сексолог 🔞” (@orlovsex), 2,245 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orlovsex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.