Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net +654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,865–39,769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:59
39,623
+5
19 Sept 2026, 13:01
39,618
+60
17 Sept 2026, 04:57
39,558
-27
13 Sept 2026, 19:54
39,585
-23
12 Sept 2026, 04:21
39,608
-33
9 Sept 2026, 21:01
39,641
-1
6 Sept 2026, 14:35
39,642
-20
4 Sept 2026, 04:15
39,662
+8
2 Sept 2026, 21:05
39,654
-11
1 Sept 2026, 20:42
39,665
+3
1 Sept 2026, 00:05
39,662
+5
31 Aug 2026, 00:34
39,657
+4
30 Aug 2026, 03:47
39,653
+60
29 Aug 2026, 02:36
39,593
+78
28 Aug 2026, 01:47
39,515
+149
27 Aug 2026, 00:04
39,366
+86
26 Aug 2026, 02:02
39,280
+3
25 Aug 2026, 05:34
39,277
-8
24 Aug 2026, 02:39
39,285
+32
22 Aug 2026, 09:25
39,253
first reading
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.03%
avg views ÷ 39,623 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 117 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
117 (29 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
164,260
Reactions total
27,017
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 00:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,550
Videos
≈316
Links
≈1,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13m 09s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54,966 reactions across 113 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
10,816
19.7%
❤
9,740
17.7%
🙏
8,997
16.4%
🤬
6,954
12.7%
⚡
6,031
11.0%
😭
5,119
9.31%
💔
2,605
4.74%
🔥
1,285
2.34%
🏆
779
1.42%
😢
651
1.18%
🕊
435
0.791%
🤝
326
0.593%
😱
319
0.58%
😡
244
0.444%
👏
241
0.438%
🤯
188
0.342%
❤🔥
140
0.255%
✍
53
0.096%
🫡
14
0.025%
💘
13
0.024%
2 further kinds
16
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,828 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
972
across the posts below
Posts paid on
108
of 117 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
105
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pavel_v_doroge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 117 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Жесточайшая агрессия к диким животным. Причем полное игнорирование науки, ученых, профильных экспертов. Как и с тиграми, которых призывают расстреливать за выход из дикой природы, медведей сейчас обвинили во всех смертных грехах и реально призывают их расстреливать, «желательно без лимитов и ограничений». Причем на руках многочисленные факты — о разрушении среды обитания, о нехватке кормовой базы. А еще о том, что ни…
Скоро опубликуем единый реестр квот на разрешённый отстрел медведей в России на сезон охоты 2026/2027 годов. То есть покажем, сколько медведей власти регионов совокупно разрешили убить в масштабах всей страны.
А пока новости такие.
В Красноярском крае чиновники объявили награду — премию за отстрел медведя в размере 36,5 тысячи рублей. Был подписан официальный указ о разрешённых квотах на календарный год: можно унич…
На 25 сентября 2026 года за весь календарный год в России насчитывается около 35 нападений медведей. Практически во всех случаях именно нападения были спровоцированы (гоняли медведя палкой, стреляли по нему, пошли в глухую тайгу во время официального запрета и предупреждения о появлении медведей и так далее).
При этом в прошлом, 2025 году, нападений было примерно столько же, но погибших было меньше. То есть конфликт…
⚡️ Запугивание людей медведями стало масштабным. Кто-то проводит очень грамотную информационную кампанию: мы фиксируем даже массовые бот-публикации с призывами расправляться с медведями в социальных сетях. С новых аккаунтов агрессивно кричат о том, что нужно увеличить квоты, разрешить зимние убийства спящих медведей, вбрасывают информацию о том, что их «развелось столько, что не умещаются в тайге».
Главное, на что о…
Человек забирается всё глубже и глубже — в самые тайные уголки Земли. Сейчас по всему миру разгораются крупные скандалы вокруг добычи редкоземельных и других минеральных ресурсов даже на океаническом дне. Там хотят начать промышленную добычу, что крайне опасно для экосистем.
Допустим, главный мировой конфликт разворачивается вокруг проекта Дональда Трампа в США. Ещё 24 апреля 2025 года он подписал Executive Order 14…
1. Конфликты с медведями и тиграми будут продолжаться. Будут жертвы, реальные смерти и, в отместку, решения об увеличении отстрела животных.
2. Это не поможет решать проблемы даже минимально: на место убитых хищников придут следующие — до тех пор, пока система управления не поставит проблему на федеральный контроль и не даст команду разобраться в ПРИЧИНАХ выхода хищников к людям.
3. А причины УЖЕ ИЗВЕСТНЫ, и об это…
Наша страна — на первом месте в мире по территориям, занятым лесами. Больше 800 миллионов гектар — это российское «зелёное море тайги».
По статистике — Русская Тайга только растёт и расширяется.
По международной статистике — только лишь 7% лесов посажено людьми. Остальные 93%, соответственно, это «дикие», «настоящие» природные леса, так получается?!
Вот только с реальным положением дел эта международная статистика…
Соратники, мы доработали и улучшили нашу «Станцию наблюдения за Землёй». Это бесплатный сервис со спутниковыми картами NASA, работающими в режиме онлайн, и необходимыми слоями для изучения местности: вырубки, деградация экосистем, засухи и многое другое.
Отдельно на карту выведены точки возможных очагов возгорания — потенциальных природных пожаров. При нажатии на каждую точку можно увидеть время обнаружения, мощност…
Итак, еще раз о реальной ситуации с выходом медведей в России. Кто-то активно «подливает масла в огонь» разгоняя панику среди населения. Цитирую издание РТ:
«Случай с публикацией фейковых изображений медведей в чатах лесных посёлков далеко не единственный. Так, сейчас правоохранители выясняют детали публикации 16 сентября в интернете сгенерированной нейросетями картинки с диким зверем, якобы разгуливавшим возле сёл …
⚡️ ВНИМАНИЕ: интернет завалили фейками о выходе медведей к людям и нападениях
Ситуация с медведями действительно сложная, уже эксперты подтвердили, что медведям просто нечего есть и они выходят к людям. Есть единичные случаи нападений, к сожалению, есть жертвы, и требуются срочные решения. Власти просто линейно расстреливают медведей в отместку за конфликты — на один конфликт просто убивают десятки медведей. Это НЕ …
Мы хотим реализовать интерактивный сервис с глубокой аналитикой масштабного уничтожения дикой природы, где в режиме онлайн можно будет без необходимости изучать сложные научные исследования и читать развернутые статьи — получить информацию и визуально увидеть масштаб экологического коллапса.
Что, если это будут полноценные интерактивные графики, благодаря которым можно сразу оценить глобальность проблемы? Например, …
Мы заперлись в своих бетонных городских агломерациях и всё дальше от настоящей живой природы — от того, без чего и наши вымышленные забетонированные миры существовать не способны. Боль природы, боль младшего дикого брата понятна немногим. Доли процента от общей массы человечества — это даже не число, а погрешность в масштабе планетарной осознанности.
Вот североатлантический гладкий кит — в живых осталось всего неско…
😭287🤬108🙏53💯30💔24❤15🔥10⚡7
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @pavel_v_doroge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чувствуете ли вы психологическую усталость, состояние потерянности и эмоционального истощения на фоне общего хаоса вокруг? Оцените свое состояние по шкале от 1 до 10
10 — очень тяжело25%
910%
810%
711%
65%
5 — ощущение нереальности происходящего и копится усталость26%
45%
33%
21%
1 — очень легко1%
Shares as published, totalling 97%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Alexey Sibirsky @alexey_sibirsky · 25,084 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
ДОКТОР ДЕНИС ИВАНОВ @doctor_denisivanov · 24,495 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПАВЕЛ ПАШКОВ” (@pavel_v_doroge), 39,623 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavel_v_doroge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.