Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «Огонек» подавитель дронов

Channel

«Огонек» подавитель дронов

@podaviteldronov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,921subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002061864344
TypeChannel
Username@podaviteldronov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/podaviteldronov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9151,9211,9186 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,917 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,921 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,920 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,921 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,919 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,920 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,921 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 38 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,914–1,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 02:221,921+1
10 Sept 2026, 04:201,920+1
4 Sept 2026, 22:561,919+1
29 Aug 2026, 08:451,918-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:151,921+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:361,920-1
16 Aug 2026, 13:561,921+4
13 Aug 2026, 06:571,917+2
7 Aug 2026, 02:481,915no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:331,915first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8739.4%
🔥8337.6%
💯177.69%
146.33%
146.33%
🤔31.36%
🤝20.905%
😁10.452%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC218 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рекомендуется к просмотру. Среди изделий других производителей будут показаны и наши разработки.

🔥7🤝2

29 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC575 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как известно в МО есть все... но не у всех.... а нам за Державу обидно.

👍9💯6🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC683 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прибор уже едет с завода, до среды должен быть у нас на руках. Постараемся записать обзор с возможностями изделия.

🔥7

27 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,650 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наши изделия даже спустя длительное время все ещё стоят на страже жизни бойцов. @Sanches_mehan как всегда на связи

👍9🔥73💯2

24 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,780 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Распробовали и используем на наших устройствах. Крайне рекомендовано к изучению

👍3🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC783 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А в кармане у него что?.... Праильна.... Чебуршка с Огоньками😉. Для гвардейцев-десантников готовим очередную помощь модернизированными Огоньками.

👍6💯1🔥1😁1

22 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,780 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не пропали. Снова на просторах нашей необъятный Родины проводим тестирование новинок. На следующей неделе придёт первый пехотный вариант Озона с широкополосной антенной. Но его также можно будет использовать и стационарно, с дистанционным включением по сети.

🔥10👍73

13 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC≈1,930 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока мы приближается к созданию автоматической системы РЭБ на базе ПАК Озон хочу напомнить, что у нас также имеются и проверенные временем изделия: - комплект из двух Огоньков 700-1020 МГц , 2100-2700 МГц, 5700-5900 МГц. - комплект из 2-х Химер с возможностью перестройки частоты 400-1050 МГц, 1700-2600 МГц, 5200-6100 МГц. - ну и естественно сам ПАК Озон на частоты 400-1200 МГц с комплектом направленных антенн.

👍83🔥3

11 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC930 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Знаем ребят лично, да и для хорошего дела не жалко. Кому нужны такие же, то обращайтесь к @Sanches_mehan

👍9

8 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC≈2,420 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы не так давно обещали хорошие новости по нашему комплексу РЭБ ПАК "Озон". Так вот они у нас есть.... Мы нашли возможность обнаружения частот управления фпв-дронов на своем анализаторе спектра, используя программное обеспечение "Тишина". ПО РЭР "Тишина" позволяет обнаруживать и определять параметры ППРЧ любых прошивок на основе ELRS поверх LoRa. Дальность определения озвучивать не будем, но даже со штатной ант

🔥86👍6

8 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC810 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Внедрение новых технологий должно идти нога в ногу с обучением личного состава. А у нас с эксплуатацией и традиционных средств РЭБ беда. Чего стоит их установка под мангал....

💯6🤔3

3 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC≈2,160 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На данный момент заявленный китайский продукт не демонстрирует ожидаемых результатов. Основная критика касается работы анализатора, который в автоматическом режиме осуществляет подавление выбранной частоты. Аппаратное обеспечение реагирует на наиболее мощные близкие сигналы и инициирует процедуру их подавления. Особо улыбнуло, что устройство обнаруживает частоту работы твой же радиостанции и радостно ее глушит 😂.

🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @podaviteldronov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

3mx.ru🛡
@ru3mx · 24,193
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 September 2026
Гагаринг. Лаборатория электроники.
@my_el_lab · 44,085
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«Огонек» подавитель дронов” (@podaviteldronov), 1,921 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podaviteldronov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.