Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Politically Incorrect

Channel

Politically Incorrect

@politicallyincorrectjokes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

59,127subscribers

-412 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002362600
TypeChannel
Username@politicallyincorrectjokes
DescriptionPolitically Incorrect Jokes: some are offensive, others clever but they're all politically incorrect! Business enquires: @pijadmin Buy ads: https://telega.io/channels/PoliticallyIncorrectJokes/card
Created17 December 2015measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/politicallyincorrectjokes

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

59,12759,53959,3335 August 2026 — 59,539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 59,530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59,520 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,514 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,509 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59,521 subscribers11 August 2026 — 59,519 subscribers12 August 2026 — 59,510 subscribers12 August 2026 — 59,500 subscribers14 August 2026 — 59,506 subscribers15 August 2026 — 59,501 subscribers17 August 2026 — 59,483 subscribers18 August 2026 — 59,470 subscribers19 August 2026 — 59,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 59,440 subscribers21 August 2026 — 59,432 subscribers22 August 2026 — 59,415 subscribers24 August 2026 — 59,388 subscribers25 August 2026 — 59,368 subscribers26 August 2026 — 59,366 subscribers27 August 2026 — 59,362 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,349 subscribers29 August 2026 — 59,342 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,327 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,310 subscribers1 September 2026 — 59,284 subscribers2 September 2026 — 59,274 subscribers3 September 2026 — 59,266 subscribers5 September 2026 — 59,250 subscribers8 September 2026 — 59,210 subscribers11 September 2026 — 59,190 subscribers13 September 2026 — 59,156 subscribers14 September 2026 — 59,139 subscribers16 September 2026 — 59,154 subscribers18 September 2026 — 59,127 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,065–59,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:1859,127-27
16 Sept 2026, 11:4159,154+15
14 Sept 2026, 13:0159,139-17
13 Sept 2026, 02:2259,156-34
11 Sept 2026, 03:5659,190-20
8 Sept 2026, 07:3659,210-40
5 Sept 2026, 04:1959,250-16
3 Sept 2026, 07:0659,266-8
2 Sept 2026, 04:3859,274-10
1 Sept 2026, 07:4559,284-26
31 Aug 2026, 08:5559,310-17
30 Aug 2026, 12:0759,327-15
29 Aug 2026, 08:5759,342-7
28 Aug 2026, 08:0259,349-13
27 Aug 2026, 11:2559,362-4
26 Aug 2026, 12:5759,366-2
25 Aug 2026, 15:5259,368-20
24 Aug 2026, 15:2759,388-27
22 Aug 2026, 21:1959,415-17
21 Aug 2026, 11:1559,432first reading

Engagement

7,213 posts held, back to 17 December 2015the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 526 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 59,127 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,800
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 7,213 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held7,213 (17 December 201520 September 2026)
Views total469,640
Reactions total11,989
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,620
Videos
372
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25,685 reactions across 51 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣19,78177.0%
👍3,45513.5%
1,3205.14%
👎1,1294.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 660,167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 1 July 2024 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @politicallyincorrectjokes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 1 July 2024 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 05:03 UTC≈5,190 views320 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣297👍23

18 Sept 2026, 09:33 UTC≈8,450 views321 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣270👎38👍85

17 Sept 2026, 05:02 UTC≈10,900 views259 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣234👍15👎91

16 Sept 2026, 06:02 UTC≈13,700 views488 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣376👍6627👎19

15 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈13,300 views429 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣395👍227👎5

14 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC≈14,400 views525 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣43260👍30👎3

13 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC≈22,800 views636 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣548👍5126👎11

12 Sept 2026, 05:01 UTC≈16,200 views591 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣381👍129👎4932

11 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC≈15,800 views607 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

#911day @PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

👍335🤣166👎9214

11 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC≈16,500 views430 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

#911day @PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣334👍829👎5

10 Sept 2026, 05:04 UTC≈16,400 views300 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣258👍288👎6

9 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC≈18,100 views573 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

@PoliticallyIncorrectJokes

🤣501👍3827👎7

Showing the 12 most recent of 7,213 posts we hold for @politicallyincorrectjokes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

DIRTY MEMES
@Adult_memes69 · 14,076
#1
Memes
@bestmemes · 104,635
#2
Shitpost
@shitpost · 25,611
#3
yesUsuck™️
@StupidUsernameee · 9,302
#4
Let there be memes
@LTBMemes · 5,847
#5
Relatable Memes ™
@Relatable_meme · 37,052
#6
Wholesome Memes ™
@Wholesome_Meme_TM · 50,501
#7
OnlyMemes™
@OnlymemesX · 6,387
#8
AdMEME
@admeme · 4,181
#9
High IQ Memes
@HighIQMemes · 25,349
#10
Casual 𝖭̶𝗂̶𝗁̶𝗂̶𝗅̶𝗂̶𝗌̶𝗆̶
@CasualNihilism · 3,848
#11
Sarcasm
@sarcasm9 · 61,761
#12
Programmer Humor
@programmer_humor · 21,470
#13
Memes
@The_Meme_Lords · 5,521
#14
Xavier replies 😂🤣
@xavierzone · 64,194
#15
🔥 Alt-Right Memes
@altright_memes · 12,196
#16
Stonetoss
@stone_toss · 21,035
#17
9Gag Meme
@Meme69420 · 1,634
#18
FUN HOUSE
@Memes_And_Adult_Videos · 39,661
#19
Dirty Memes
@dirtymemechannel · 10,434
#20
Fragile Communism
@FragileCommunism · 4,146
#21
Best Memes™ 🇺🇸
@Best_Memes_TM · 15,765
#22
4chan webm dump
@webms_4chan · 14,645
#23
The Funny Ones
@TheFunnyOnes · 7,026
#24
UnFiltered Humour
@UnFilteredHumour · 42,799
#25
Programmer Jokes
@programmerjokes · 107,064
#26
Memes™
@memes_room · 25,580
#27
Nuclear Memes
@Nuclear_Memes · 19,971
#28
🎙sᴀʀᴄᴀsᴛɪᴄ ᴍᴇᴍᴇs™
@sarcastticmemes · 46,582
#29
Memes, Memes Everywhere!
@MemeWorld · 21,054
#30
Meme kingdom™
@MemekingdomTM · 45,901
#31
Holy Meme Empire
@HolyMemeE · 3,626
#32
Meme Hub
@Offendedyet · 7,798
#33
Shower Thoughts 🚿
@showerthoughts · 36,163
#34
Dank Memes Gang ️️
@dankmemesgang · 11,641
#35
Bruh Memes
@BrrrUhhhz · 13,564
#36
Tech Crimes
@techcrimes · 14,711
#37
Be Like Bro
@updateee · 42,198
#38
Sickipedia
@Sickipedia · 11,791
#39
TIKVAH-ETHIOPIA
@tikvahethiopia · 1,621,770
#40
Weak
@Sarclassm · 1,262
#41
Daily LOLs with Aladeen
@Funny_videos_comedy_memes · 40,944
#42
Massive Memes
@Massive_Memes · 2,235
#43
Memesta
@Memesta · 2,937
#44
memelord
@memelord85 · 12,009
#45
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین
@vahidonline · 1,402,047
#46
مملکته
@mamlekate · 566,935
#47
Memes Plz
@MemesPlz · 2,663
#48
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 322,872
#49
Memes I Show To Your Mum
@memes4mum · 4,255
#50
Best Funny Videos 😂
@memes_comedy · 236,004
#51
Mildly Interesting 🤔
@mildlyinteresting · 7,643
#52
/g/'s Tech Memes
@gentoomemes · 28,158
#53
From the river to the sea, Ceuta shall be free!
@volmemes · 15,599
#54
CANAL HUMOR
@canalhumor · 56,959
#55
Dark Memes 🔞
@myygoodmemes · 6,664
#56
art mems👨‍🎨
@artmemestg · 3,610
#57
Femoids Unleashed
@FemoidsUnleashed · 14,430
#58
Political memes
@PoliticalMemes · 14,831
#59
Today I Learned 🎓
@todayilearned · 7,489
#60
Absolute Trash Memes
@MyMemesSuck · 949
#61
[XD] Productions
@XDProductions · 5,575
#62
Worth Fighting For
@worthfightingfor_telegram · 15,107
#63
Working Men Memes
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,826
#64
U In Hurricane [EN]
@uinhurricane · 7,732
#65
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 114,627
#66
Born To Meme
@memersondrugs · 1,440
#67
اقوال الانعام
@aqvalanam · 39,803
#68
Broken Cats
@brokencats · 23,783
#69
Dark Humor
@dark_humor_english · 6,241
#70
Shocking Facts®
@ShockingFact · 34,657
#71
Neon Movie
@movie_tg · 9,626
#72
Ultimora 24 - Notizie da Ultimora.net
@ultimora24 · 106,509
#73

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Shitpost
@shitpost · 25,611
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 September 2026
😂 Memes Funny Jokes
@Funny_Memes_Jokes_English_Gifs · 90,084
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Sarcasm
@sarcasm9 · 61,761
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Memes
@bestmemes · 104,635
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Be Like Bro
@updateee · 42,198
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
Century Cinema 🌎
@century_cinema · 73,991
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
Schanzenwatch-Broadcast
@drache208 · 52,986
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
Daily LOLs with Aladeen
@Funny_videos_comedy_memes · 40,944
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026
LaughHub: Memes for Days
@laughthub · 43,054
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 30 August 2026
GAST Cinema 🎥🍿
@gastcinema · 66,621
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 21 August 2026
Wholesome Memes ™
@Wholesome_Meme_TM · 50,501
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
Dammit, English!
@dammit_english · 23,967
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
Rajat Arora - Class 12th Chintu/Chinti Gang
@rajatarora12 · 41,684
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 29 August 2026
Memee | Memes
@memee · 121,648
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Relatable Memes ™
@Relatable_meme · 37,052
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 September 2026
Programmer Jokes
@programmerjokes · 107,064
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
CANAL HUMOR
@canalhumor · 56,959
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 August 2026
Memes™
@memes_room · 25,580
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 September 2026
Shower Thoughts 🚿
@showerthoughts · 36,163
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
Xavier replies 😂🤣
@xavierzone · 64,194
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Pickup lines 🐬
@Pickup_LineTM · 28,848
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 9 September 2026
Broken Cats
@brokencats · 23,783
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 17 September 2026
Meme kingdom™
@MemekingdomTM · 45,901
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Forocoches
@forocoches_oficial · 41,886
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Politically Incorrect” (@politicallyincorrectjokes), 59,127 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politicallyincorrectjokes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.