Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Магистратура для Таролога

Channel

Магистратура для Таролога

@profi_jennifer

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,279subscribers

-223 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001519351881
TypeChannel
Username@profi_jennifer
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/profi_jennifer

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,27619,50619,3917 August 2026 — 19,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,498 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,495 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,489 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,488 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,479 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,466 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,440 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,427 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,414 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,409 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,395 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,381 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,387 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,377 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,367 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,355 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,354 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,350 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,337 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,330 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,322 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,320 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,323 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,309 subscribers7 September 2026 — 19,301 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,293 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,288 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,281 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,276 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,279 subscribers19,2797 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,242–19,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:3619,279+3
16 Sept 2026, 02:5619,276-5
14 Sept 2026, 10:1619,281-7
12 Sept 2026, 16:2019,288-5
10 Sept 2026, 18:5919,293-8
7 Sept 2026, 15:1819,301-8
4 Sept 2026, 16:1519,309-14
3 Sept 2026, 00:1819,323+3
1 Sept 2026, 19:3519,320-2
31 Aug 2026, 18:0219,322-8
30 Aug 2026, 21:2719,330-7
30 Aug 2026, 00:0419,337-13
28 Aug 2026, 21:4419,350-4
28 Aug 2026, 01:1319,354-1
27 Aug 2026, 00:2319,355-12
26 Aug 2026, 03:0319,367-10
25 Aug 2026, 00:3519,377-10
23 Aug 2026, 15:2419,387+6
22 Aug 2026, 01:1819,381-14
20 Aug 2026, 15:5119,395first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.73%
avg views ÷ 19,279 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held37 (15 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total13,463
Reactions total448
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,521 reactions across 36 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,18647.0%
90035.7%
👍25510.1%
❤‍🔥522.06%
💯461.82%
🥰311.23%
👏281.11%
😍100.397%
🏆60.238%
😁50.198%
🤝20.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 36 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @profi_jennifer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,070 views73 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Реально, было бы странно, если вы ставите цену от 2000 рублей, а ваши это ответы - это пару слов из заученных значений по книжечке. Переход на новый этап, будет конфликт, ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ... Чем подробнее ваши трактовки - тем больше люди готовы вам платить. Но не в смысле: «О, у неё голосовые по 15 минут, я получу много букв за свои две тыщи, надо брать!» Тут дело в ВАШЕЙ же уверенности. Когда вы связываете карты межд

🔥4918😍6

31 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC973 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @gadalka_nagadala

Со всех сторон начинающий таролог слышит: «поднимай чек», «ты должна стоить дорого», «низкая цена - это неуважение к себе». И многие ставят высокий ценник не потому, что чувствуют в себе силы, а просто потому что боятся ставить ниже, не быть же лохом на фоне других. Но стоимость услуг растет вместе с опытом, знаниями и внутренней готовностью отвечать за свою работу на этом уровне. Самооценка не должна измеряться ст

🔥2511💯9

28 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,650 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Выпускники профа, инфо ниже - для вас! Вы ведь помните, что для вас открыт клуб повышения квалификации? В сентябре у нас с вами будет очень «волшебная» тема - Эзотерика в психологии 🔮 Колдовать и делать привороты, к сожалению, не будем. Отменяйте заказ на глаз дракона и лапки кузнечиков. Зато будем разбираться, почему мы вообще верим в порчи и сглазы? А ещё изучим, как за порчей увидеть психическое расстройство,

🔥2216🥰10

26 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,900 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

✅ Запись бесплатного эфира по Таро ▶️ СМОТРЕТЬ ЗАПИСЬ (нажмите тут) Напомню, что вчера мы подробно разобрали Суд, Мир и пару раскладов с этими арканами. Кто был онлайн, сказали, что уже после этого эфира многое по полочкам разложилось! Доступ к записи - 7 дней от текущей даты.

🔥135🥰1

26 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,850 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Значения арканов Суд и Мир: подробное объяснение с разбором раскладов 💬 Друзья, сегодня наш куратор Яна в 18:00 МСК проведёт бесплатный мастер-класс по Таро. Эфир рассчитан на новичков, но практикующим тарологам тоже будет полезно послушать! Особенно если вы чувствуете, что где-то есть пробелы в знаниях. Ссылка на эфир появится в этом канале незадолго до начала. Всех ждём! 🧡

19🔥15😍4

25 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈2,030 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Все мои ученики, кто проходил психологию и терапию, тоже так умеют 😎

13🔥8👍4💯2

25 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈2,050 views44 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Не знаю, куда это лучше написать, но пост сейчас очень в тему, поэтому оставлю здесь 😂 Хочу от всей души поблагодарить Джен. Несколько месяцев назад, кажется, весной, я попала на бесплатный разбор о реализации и ведении блога. Мы разобрали, что стоит за моей прокрастинацией, а потом Джен пригласила меня на терапевтическую сессию. Для меня это был очень волнительный опыт. Но даже одна сессия стала тем самым толчком

26🔥14🥰4

24 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,940 views154 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥9043❤‍🔥13👏5👍3

20 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈2,670 views67 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Не могу вести стабильно свой блог, что делать?» ❓ Соскучились по раскладам? Есть у меня один новенький для вас! Предыстория: Недавно мы встречались с командой, и мы разговорились с одной из девочек, традиционно назовём ее Машей. Она ведёт свой лайфстайл-блог, но сейчас у неё период застоя. В процессе разговора мы выяснили: когда ей в жизни становится скучновато и не с кем общаться, она активно занимается блогом: с

42🔥16👍9

18 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,770 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026

⚡️ Ищем ДВУХ клиентов на бесплатный психологический расклад от профи-тарологов! 👉 Суббота, 22 августа в 15:00 МСК. Ваш запрос может быть любым: отношения, деньги, самореализация — что угодно. Всё будет проходить с бережной поддержкой куратора Юлии Лебедевой. 👉 Понедельник, 24 августа в 18:30 МСК. Запросы, которые в приоритете: соперничество с мужчинами, сложности в продвижении по карьерной лестнице («Стеклянный п

30🔥14👍6

15 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈3,000 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как укротить свою тень? 😈 Начнём с того, что укрощать никого не надо. Тень, в первую очередь, нужно принять и полюбить) Мы можем годами подавлять свою тень, потому что когда-то решили: злиться нельзя, быть эгоистичной плохо, хотеть внимания стыдно, быть глупой непозволительно, и так далее. И на это подавление очень много сил уходит, а вы даже не замечате этого. Зато если вы со своей тенью познакомились, это даст

❤‍🔥26🔥10👍84

15 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈2,760 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Схема расклада «МОЯ ТЕНЬ» 🃏 Тень есть в каждом из нас, и далеко не каждый с ней хорошо знаком. Наша Тень — это та часть нашей личности, которую мы считаем «плохой» и отвергаем ее. И чем больше мы от нее отказываемся, тем сильнее она мешает нам жить счастливо . В следующем посте я расскажу, что делать с этой информацией дальше, а вы пока ответьте мне на один вопрос: Знакомы ли вы со своей тенью? Принимаете ли ее?

49🔥24❤‍🔥9👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @profi_jennifer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@profi_jennifer edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz863 voters

Что здесь лишнее?

  1. Вытащить карту на его вопрос50%
  2. Спросить, кем работает/какие источники дохода20%
  3. Узнать, как давно есть эта проблема8%
  4. Выяснить, что клиент пытался делать для роста дохода23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Карты, Джен и 2 кота
@taro_jennifer · 78,397
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Карты таро 🔮 с Анастасией Лыковой
@lykova_taro · 104,114
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Вика Студеникина | Школа Таро
@study_taro · 35,843
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
VITA VIRTUS
@vitavirtusveritas · 27,652
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
Айдар подкаст
@aydar_enteo · 26,372
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
КРУГ СИЛЫ с Оксузян Робертом
@robert_oksuzyan · 32,968
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Матрица Судьбы | Иоанна Ложкина
@ioanna_lozhkina · 32,320
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
Цифровая психология. Лиана Кочетова
@NumerologLiana2525 · 69,526
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
SVETLANALEIMAKH - официальный канал Леймах
@svetlanaleimakh · 46,504
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Магистратура для Таролога” (@profi_jennifer), 19,279 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profi_jennifer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.