Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Простые Мысли

Channel

Простые Мысли

@prostyemisli

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48,160subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194043840
TypeChannel
Username@prostyemisli
Created31 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prostyemisli

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

48,15948,18948,1746 August 2026 — 48,187 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,187 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,187 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,189 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,187 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,186 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,175 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,168 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,163 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,169 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,166 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,184 subscribers18 August 2026 — 48,175 subscribers20 August 2026 — 48,178 subscribers21 August 2026 — 48,181 subscribers24 August 2026 — 48,165 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48,160 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,159 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,169 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,165 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,160 subscribers48,1606 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 24 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,155–48,194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 17:3648,160-5
28 Aug 2026, 17:2848,165-4
27 Aug 2026, 20:2748,169+10
26 Aug 2026, 17:0248,159-1
25 Aug 2026, 14:2648,160-5
24 Aug 2026, 11:1848,165-16
21 Aug 2026, 04:5448,181+3
20 Aug 2026, 04:1148,178+3
18 Aug 2026, 09:3748,175-9
17 Aug 2026, 12:1548,184+18
16 Aug 2026, 05:4348,166-3
14 Aug 2026, 17:4548,169+6
13 Aug 2026, 08:5348,163-5
12 Aug 2026, 09:3348,168-7
11 Aug 2026, 06:5348,175-11
10 Aug 2026, 08:1148,186-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:3248,187-2
8 Aug 2026, 13:5548,189+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:0848,187-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:3048,188first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 48,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,000
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held30 (12 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total216,080
Reactions total5,071
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12,854 reactions across 29 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,75852.6%
👍2,92122.7%
🔥8536.64%
🤯6795.28%
🤔5414.21%
😁5344.15%
🙏1631.27%
👏1451.13%
😱1170.91%
👌760.591%
🎉670.521%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
671
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 30 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
258
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prostyemisli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈5,180 views151 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Часто переезжая с место на место я приучил себя за свой же счёт чистить кондиционеры. Каждый раз. Не то, чтобы я какой-то лютый невротик, протирающий все поверхности, но в данном случае это реально имеет смысл делать. Большинство хозяев не занимается чисткой годами, а ты, въезжая, просто рискуешь дышать супер-вредными вещами: спорами грибов, бактериями, аллергенами. Если бы они там просто копились, ничего страшного

102👍35🔥12👏2

25 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈13,500 views795 reactions22 Starsread 29 August 2026

В "Искусстве войны" Сунь-Цзы излагает занятную логику: осаждая вражескую армию, не забудь оставить ей путь к отступлению. Когда тебя окружили и лишили надежды на спасение, ты в порыве отчаяния будешь биться изо всех сил, радикально, до последнего вздоха. Но если появляется поле для отступления, разум ухватится за эту нить, побежит через эту дыру на встречу к шансу жить. Открытая дверь, оставленная для врага может бы

511👍164🔥53🤔40🤯9👏5😁5👌3

23 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈14,700 views320 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤯16484👍42🔥16🤔5😁4🎉2🙏2

21 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈17,400 views621 reactions5 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Фри-соло альпинизм — это экстремальный вид спорта, при котором смельчаки в одиночку взбираются на скалы без страховки. Ожидаемо, от этого часто умирают. Неблагоразумно, правда? Правда. Вот только условное курение несёт намного более серьёзные риски. Около 2/3 курильщиков умирают именно из-за своей привычки, и, конечно, эти риски несопоставимы даже с экстремальным спортом. Однако, согласитесь, две картинки выше вызыв

430👍108🔥57🤔9🙏5👌3🤯3😁3

17 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈19,400 views349 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Уши намного более уязвимы, чем мы считали раньше. На днях опубликовали очень, очень показательное исследование. Взяли 42 человека, повесили на них дозиметры и отправили на концерт. В среднем, участники провели 10 часов при 100 дБ. Через сутки 41 из 42 участников ИДЕАЛЬНО сдали стандартный клинический тест на слух. Обычно именно такие тесты используют, чтобы устанавливать "норму" шума вокруг, именно опираясь на эти

205👍71🔥36🤔13😱11🎉6🙏4👌3

14 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈20,100 views321 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В 1950-х детей успевали приучить к туалету примерно к двум годам. В 2000-х норма сдвинулась до трёх лет. Сегодня в США воспитатели всё чаще буквально видят первоклассников в подгузниках. Да, я не шучу, это реальная проблема. Учителям приходится не только помогать детишкам ходить в туалет. Самые простые навыки дети попросту не обретают. Завязать шнурки, например. В штате Мэриленд директорам прям официально разрешили

🤯20559😁32😱9🤔5👍4👌2🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈21,300 views428 reactions39 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вера в свободу воли ассоциируется с лучшим самоконтролем, пониженным конформизмом, лучшей успеваемостью и продвижением на работе. Люди, которые верят в свободу воли реже изменяют и чаще кооперируются с другими людьми. [1], [2], [3] В одном эксперименте, испытуемым дали прочитать небольшой абзац про детерминизм. Нарратив всем известный: ваше поведение определяется мозгом, гормонами и влиянием среды, свободы воли нет.

285👍80🔥40🤔12👏4👌3😁3🎉1

10 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈20,000 views376 reactions12 Starsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

206👍81🤔44😁14🤯12🔥9👏3😱3

8 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈19,800 views392 reactions37 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

По всему миру видно: больше денег универсально означает больше счастья. Но вот это слово "универсально" на самом деле не означает абсолютность. Это значит, что если тысяче людей добавить 25% к месячной зарплате, то средний уровень удовлетворённости вырастет. Из-за этого, люди с западным мышлением склонны думать, что счастье в деньгах. При этом игнорируется тот факт, что среди тысячи обязательно найдётся несколько,

255👍79🔥35👌6🎉5🤯5🤔4🙏3

6 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈18,300 views354 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026

Продолжаю воевать с тейками о безопасных дозах алкоголя. То, чего очень не хватало научной литературе по этому вопросу — это ясной оценки качества доказательств в ту или другую сторону. Что не удивительно. Это гигантская работа: нужно собрать все исследования, оценить, насколько они хороши по какой-то метрике, сравнить их друг с другом, поместить в статистическую модель и посчитать мета-анализ. А затем повторить эт

👍20083👏35🔥17🤔6🙏5👌3😁3

3 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈22,100 views355 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Когда я ещё играл в соревновательные игры, то замечал, что можно точно определить, насколько в команде все будут друг друга ненавидеть, если просто узнать их национальности. Не будем сейчас распространяться, но есть ряд стран, с которыми просто невозможно найти общий язык: тебя в любом случае будут презирать, ты в любом случае будешь не прав и минимальная ошибка обязательно станет поводом для наказания. Недавнее ис

222👍70🤯27🔥15🤔9😁8🎉2👌1

1 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈24,300 views609 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Найден способ не тупеть, когда используешь нейронки. Вместо обычного чат-бота, учёные настроили систему агентов, которые принципиально не отвечают на прямые вопросы. Вы спрашиваете, а вас спрашивают в ответ либо направляют мысль. По итогу, мотивация использовать нейронку остаётся той же, но усиливается мета-когнитивное мышление. Это когда вместо пассивного "скажи, сколько будет 2+2" вы задаётесь вопросом: "что нужн

👍38096🤔85🔥22😁12🙏6👌5🎉3

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @prostyemisli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,569 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Простые Мысли” (@prostyemisli), 48,160 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prostyemisli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.