Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 91 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,598–10,822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 06:48
10,634
-1
5 Nov 2026, 04:17
10,635
+1
3 Nov 2026, 00:48
10,634
-1
2 Nov 2026, 03:21
10,635
+9
1 Nov 2026, 01:40
10,626
+1
31 Oct 2026, 03:15
10,625
+1
30 Oct 2026, 03:10
10,624
-2
29 Oct 2026, 02:08
10,626
-2
27 Oct 2026, 23:06
10,628
+2
26 Oct 2026, 22:06
10,626
-2
26 Oct 2026, 00:15
10,628
-1
24 Oct 2026, 20:41
10,629
-5
23 Oct 2026, 17:56
10,634
-7
22 Oct 2026, 20:57
10,641
-5
21 Oct 2026, 14:20
10,646
-7
19 Oct 2026, 13:27
10,653
+4
18 Oct 2026, 16:44
10,649
+2
17 Oct 2026, 16:49
10,647
-5
16 Oct 2026, 16:44
10,652
-4
15 Oct 2026, 16:28
10,656
first reading
Engagement
135 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.62%
avg views ÷ 10,634 subscribers
Avg views / post
491
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 135 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
135 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
9,825
Reactions total
68
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
566
Videos
224
Links
179
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
146 reactions across 35 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
97
66.4%
😁
18
12.3%
👍
14
9.59%
👏
4
2.74%
💔
4
2.74%
💯
3
2.05%
🕊
3
2.05%
😢
2
1.37%
🎉
1
0.685%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (69.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
چیزی که از شما میخواهم این است که:
برای انسان شدن دانشآموزان تلاش کنید و تلاش شما موجب تربیت «جانورانِ دانشمند» و «بیماران روانیِ ماهر» نشود.
خواندن، نوشتن، ریاضیات و... زمانی اهمیت پیدا میکند که به انسان شدن کودکان کمک کنيد و اين كليد انسان بودن كودكان در آينده است
پزشک شدن، مهندس شدن، متخصص شدن، كار سختی نيست و میشود با چند سال درس خواندن به آن رسيد و چه بسا امروز ما در جامعه هم پزشكان زیادی داريم و هم مهندس…
اگر میدانستم این آخرین دقایقی است که تو را میبینم، به تو میگفتم «دوستت دارم» و نمیپنداشتم تو خود این را میدانی.
همیشه فردایی نیست تا زندگی فرصت دیگری برای جبران این غفلتها به ما دهد. کسانی را که دوست داری همیشه کنار خود داشته باش و بگو چقدر به آنها علاقه و نیاز داری.
مراقبشان باش.
گابریل_گارسیا_مارکز
@psycholand24
عشق_والدین به یکدیگر باعث ایجاد عشق در فرزندان میشود……
هرچه شخص بیشتر عشق بورزد، بیشتر به روشی عاشقانه به فرزندان خود و یا به هر کس دیگری پاسخ میدهد.
……کودکان محروم از دلبستگی عشق مادری، در ایجاد ارتباط لازم برای عشق به خود و باور اینکه دیگران دوستشان دارند و عشق به زندگی و زنده بودن ناتوان هستند. این کودکان، در بزرگسالی افرادی منزوی میشوند و
اغلب رابطه ای خصمانه با دیگران دارند.
اروین د یالوم
@psycholand24
💭تحقیر در قالب شوخی یکی از روشهای زیرکانهای است که افراد خودشیفته برای دستکاری روانی و کاهش اعتماد به نفس دیگران استفاده میکنند. شاید در ابتدا به نظر بیاهمیت یا حتی سرگرمکننده برسد، اما هدف اصلی این نوع رفتارها، کوچک کردن شما و برتری دادن به خودشان است.
این افراد معمولاً از حسادت و احساس ناامنی درونی رنج میبرند و با این شوخیهای تحقیرآمیز سعی میکنند ارزش شما را در چشم دیگران کاهش دهند.
✅ اگر با چنین رفتارهای…
برای ساختن فرزندان باید اول خویشتن را بسازی. در غیر این صورت فرزندان را برای نیازهای حیوانی، فرار از تنهایی یا پر کردن چالههای وجودت پدید آوردهای. وظیفهی تو، تنها ساختن خودی دیگر نیست، بلکه چیزی برتر است، چیزی همانند آفریدنِ یک آفریننده.
اروین_یالوم
@psycholand24
“به کجا چنین شتابان؟ آیا از لحظههای زندگیات لذت میبری؟”
در دنیای امروز، بسیاری از ما درگیر یک چرخه بیپایان از دویدن برای رسیدن به اهداف هستیم، اما گاهی فراموش میکنیم که تعادل میان تلاش برای رسیدن به هدف و لذت بردن از مسیر، ضروری است. تحقیقات روانشناسی نشان داده که زندگی در لحظه، به اندازه دستیابی به موفقیت، برای سلامت روان ضروری است.
• آیا میدانید که فراموش کردن لحظات حال، میتواند باعث اضطراب و استرس شود؟
…
اگر آموزش چيزي را پيش از پنج سالگي آغاز كنيد و با وقار و آرامش فراوان آن را به گونه اي مداوم تكرار كنيد براي ابد در ذهنتان باقي خواهد ماند. زيرا در مورد انسانها هم بسان حيوانات، آموزش تنها آنگاه با موفقيت همراه است كه از دوران كودكي آغاز شود.
شوپنهاور
@psycholand24
چرا میکوشیم آدمها را تغییر دهیم؟
این درست نیست.
"آدم باید یا دیگران را همانطور که هستند بپذیرد، یا همانطور که هستند به حال خودشان بگذارد."
آدم نمیتواند آنها را عوض کند، فقط توازنشان را بر هم میزند. چون یک انسان از قطعههای واحدی درست نشده است که بتوان تکهای را برداشت و بجایش چیزِ دیگری گذاشت. او یک کل است، و اگر آدم یک سویش را بکشد، سوی دیگرش، چه بخواهی چه نخواهی، کشیده میشود.
#کافکا
📚نامه به فلیسه
@psych…
🔴مصوبات جدید شورای مرکزی سازمان نظام روانشناسی
🔹امکان دریافت مجوز برای دوره های مجازی هم فراهم شد.
@psycholand24
❤5🎉1
Signed Maryam Mousavi
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @psycholand24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @psycholand24 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@psycholand24 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ravanrahnama_group named in 2 posts, 23 August 2026 – 24 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر آذرخش مُکری @drazarakhsh_makri · 33,409 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
دکتر مرتضی پیری @drmorteza_pere · 19,992 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 October 2026
طرحواره درمانی @tarhvaredarmani1 · 22,899 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
فیلم کوتاه روانشناسی @psychology_movie1 · 21,132 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 September 2026
کتابهای روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @psyologistravanbook · 23,207 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
استخدام روانشناسان و مشاوران @estekhdam_psy · 22,403 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @ravanketabb · 24,262 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
جزوات کنکوری روانشناسی @jozveravan1 · 23,620 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
سکس تراپی @sexterapy1 · 20,301 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
دیالکتیک علمی @ScientificDialectics · 23,682 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
رویال روانشناسی @Royal_psychologist · 19,607 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
بنیاد مرهم 🫀 Marham Foundation @Marham_Foundation · 18,426 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 October 2026
دکتر علی صاحبی @drali_sahebi · 21,982 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
کاپلانخوانی @kaplansadockk · 37,481 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
کنکور ارشد روانشناسی و مشاوره @teacher_department · 20,892 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
کنکور روانشناسی بالینی @konkoreravanshenasi · 22,020 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سایکولنـد | Pѕycнolαɴd” (@psycholand24), 10,634 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psycholand24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.