Photo, posted without a caption
❤8

Channel
@psyherologiya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,738subscribers
+112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001544594688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psyherologiya |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psyherologiya |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 4,738 | +28 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 4,710 | +13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 4,697 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 4,696 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 4,693 | +29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 4,664 | +12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 4,652 | +44 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 4,608 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 4,606 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 4,605 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 4,616 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 4,623 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 4,626 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
906 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 325 | 35.9% | |
| 🤣 | 307 | 33.9% | |
| 💯 | 89 | 9.82% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 9.49% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 5.08% | |
| 😢 | 40 | 4.42% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.662% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.442% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.221% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 906 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
Почему человеку может быть страшно обнаружить, какой он на самом деле Жила-была Света и она очень хотела наконец стать собой. Она читала про аутентичность, ходила в терапию, училась слышать желания и временами даже говорила, что больше всего на свете хочет понять, какая она настоящая. А потом однажды выяснилось, что настоящая Света вызывает у самой Светы довольно много вопросов. Потому что настоящей Свете хотелось …
❤30👏2😢1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥26❤14💯6😢1
Недавно я подумала, что я так и могу на всю следующую жизнь остаться одна. Раньше как-то само собой разумеющимся было куда-то бежать и кого-то искать. А тут вдруг: никаких парных отношений может больше никогда не случится. И как ни странно эта мысль не прогремела громом и молнией внутри. И не оставила после себя выжженную землю. Это просто факт, который вообще-то более вероятен, чем все другие варианты. То есть найт…
❤51💯17🔥13👍3😢2
Увидела этот мем и подумала, что неплохо бы вспомнить этих женщин)) Все-таки их истории весьма занятны, если смотреть с точки зрения психологии. Начнем с Афродиты. Она и девочкой не была - сразу родилась этой самой милфой, особенно по тем меркам. Короче, взрослая женщина вышла из пены и занялась тем, чем ей было предназначено. Она управляла желанием, вмешивалась в чувства людей, вызывала страсть, ревность и одержимо…
❤51
Помните таких?🤪🤪🤪
🤣35🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣34
Конечно, после пародии на поп-диагнозы спросили: «Вы это в шутку или всерьез?» Представляете? В головах уже такой замес, что самый невинный акт поведения потенциально можно (и видимо уже нужно) отнести к какому-то диагнозу🤦♀️ Тут критерий какой? Мне дискомфортно и другой делает то, что мне не нравится - значит с ним что-то не так! А если прицепить «научный» диагноз, то вроде как все ясно, кто тогда тут хороший. По…
💯23👍6
Я вам как психолог сейчас всё про вашего мужчину расскажу. А вы уже сами решайте. Во-первых, он реально абьюзер. Систематически лишает вас эмоционального подкрепления. Палец-то у него прекрасно, небось, работает, а реакции почему-то зажал. Во-вторых, он очевидно токсик. Ваши мемы берет, другим людям пересылает, а вам даже символической реакции не оставляет. Типа контент ему подходит. Поддержать вас как автора — у…
🤣79❤11👍8💯6🔥1🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣22💯2
Это очень смешно 🙈🤪🤪🤪🤪 Коллеги и опытные клиенты психологов разных направлений поймут 🤪
🤣87🔥7
Почему нам сложно благодарить родителей? Казалось бы: ушли в свою жизнь, сказали «спасибо» и все. Но ведь снова и снова от клиентов слышу: «Не могу я это сказать. И почувствовать не могу». И тогда получается что? Не дать себе испытывать благодарность - это важная для психики вещь. А почему? • Потому что кажется, что благодарность автоматически должна отменить все претензии. И тогда будто бы возникает ощущение нес…
❤23💯23😢7
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @psyherologiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПсиХерология/канал Юлии Пирумовой” (@psyherologiya), 4,738 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyherologiya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.