Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QA собес | Тестирование

Channel

QA собес | Тестирование

@qa_sobes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,070subscribers

-402 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001279911493
TypeChannel
Username@qa_sobes
DescriptionРегистрация в перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6757b3ca35130d7236444819&registryType=bloggersPermission Задания для подготовки к собеседованиям для тестировщиков. По всем вопросам: @viktorreh, @anothertechrock
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/qa_sobes

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,0699,4729,270.56 August 2026 — 9,472 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,470 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,390 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,321 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,265 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,226 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,185 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,186 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,173 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,165 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,155 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,152 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,145 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,130 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,121 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,116 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,110 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,109 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,097 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,090 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,083 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,078 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,069 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,070 subscribers9,0706 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -402. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,009–9,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 01:079,070+1
2 Nov 2026, 21:299,069-9
30 Oct 2026, 12:019,078-5
27 Oct 2026, 03:579,083-7
23 Oct 2026, 18:069,090-7
21 Oct 2026, 00:099,097-12
17 Oct 2026, 13:269,109-1
14 Oct 2026, 18:099,110-6
11 Oct 2026, 10:149,116-5
4 Oct 2026, 22:369,121-9
25 Sept 2026, 17:389,130-15
17 Sept 2026, 08:199,145-7
13 Sept 2026, 02:559,152-3
9 Sept 2026, 06:209,155-10
3 Sept 2026, 21:159,165-8
31 Aug 2026, 12:459,173-13
28 Aug 2026, 21:379,186+1
26 Aug 2026, 03:539,185-41
23 Aug 2026, 07:389,226-39
20 Aug 2026, 05:439,265first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.93%
avg views ÷ 9,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
719
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.182%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held55 (6 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total16,546
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,060
Videos
≈27
Links
≈1,520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 31 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4931.6%
❤4227.1%
🔥3019.4%
🤔127.74%
😁85.16%
🙏42.58%
❤‍🔥21.29%
👀21.29%
😍21.29%
👏10.645%
😱10.645%
🙉10.645%
🤡10.645%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.64%
2 of 55 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
557
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
857
over 53 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGaGYyo118 August 202618 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqVG5wu4favnvr9JRNV48KHVtH9gHPiP3zFW62125 August 202625 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC317 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#вопрос_на_собеседование Таблица решений (Decision Table) — это техника тест-дизайна, которая помогает представить комбинации условий и соответствующие им действия в виде таблицы. Её используют, когда поведение системы зависит сразу от нескольких условий. В таблице фиксируют возможные сочетания условий и результат, который система должна выдать для каждого сочетания. На её основе можно составить тест-кейсы и провер…

4 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC416 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

✔️ Лучшие практики Playwright и 10 ошибок ИИ-агентов ИИ вроде Cursor и Copilot генерирует десятки тестов за секунды, но они постоянно падают. Разбираем 10 главных правил стабильного Playwright и типичные ляпы, которые приходится исправлять за нейросетями. Читать

3 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC461 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#видео Разбор жизненного цикла разработки ПО (SDLC) без сложной терминологии. Видео раскладывает по полочкам ключевые этапы SDLC и роль QA на каждом из них — идеальный материал, чтобы уверенно закрыть этот классический вопрос на собеседовании. ▶️ Смотреть на YouTube

2 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC623 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⭐️ Пишем тесты с Claude Code, часть 1: первичные результаты Мне было любопытно выяснить, на что способен Claude с точки зрения написания тестов и насколько оправдано доверие, которое всё больше людей возлагают на тесты, созданные LLM. В этой статье я поделюсь первыми шагами в этом направлении, а также своими мыслями и ходом рассуждений на этом пути. Вы увидите, как я создаю начальный набор тестов для небольшого API…

31 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC651 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#видео Базовый разбор ключевой артефактной документации QA: что такое тест-кейс и как его правильно структурировать. На примере учебного проекта разбираются стандартные поля шаблона. ▶️ Смотреть на YouTube

31 Oct 2026, 10:30 UTC604 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Хочешь заговорить на английском, но не с кем практиковаться? Появилась ИИ-девушка, с которой можно общаться голосовыми на любые темы, как с носителем. Она слушает твою речь, подробно исправляет ошибки и помогает говорить увереннее. Попробовать можно бесплатно. 🇬🇧 Английский: @ChattyEnglishBot 🇩🇪 Немецкий: @ChattyGermanBot 🇪🇸 Испанский: @ChattySpanishBot 🇫🇷 Французский: @ChattyFrenchBot 🇮🇹 Итальянский: @ChattyItalia…

🤡1

30 Oct 2026, 09:32 UTC641 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Вопросы по Postman на собеседовании В этой статье мы рассмотрим наиболее часто задаваемые вопросы и ответы по Postman на собеседовании как для новичков, так и для опытных разработчиков/тестировщиков программного обеспечения. Читать

🔥1🤔1

28 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC769 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Релизный процесс QA: от рутины к автоматизации — как мы это сделали Автор рассказал, как его команда пересмотрела релизный процесс QA и нашла точки, где ручная рутина отнимала больше всего времени. Вы узнаете, какие задачи они перенесли в CI, с какими сложностями столкнулись и как это помогло сократить время релизного тестирования примерно с семи до четырёх часов. Читать

❤1

27 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC746 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#видео Понятный разбор работы с пакетами, перенаправлением потоков и переменными в Linux. В видео объясняют устройство репозиториев, различия между apt, apt-get и dpkg, а также механизмы поиска и обновления пакетов. Вторая часть посвящена практической работе в терминале: от перенаправления ввода-вывода и работы с /dev/null до создания собственных bash-скриптов, настройки системных переменных и добавлений алиасов в …

27 Oct 2026, 08:48 UTC713 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#вопрос_на_собеседование Повторное тестирование (Retesting, ретест) — это повторная проверка тест-кейсов, которые ранее завершились с ошибкой из-за обнаруженного дефекта. После того как разработчик исправил баг, тестировщик выполняет сценарий ещё раз и проверяет, устранена ли проблема. Например, если при оформлении заказа кнопка оплаты не работала, после исправления тестировщик повторяет сценарий и проверяет, что о…

26 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTC731 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

✨ Не разрешайте ИИ читать .env-файлы ИИ-ассистенты для написания кода - Claude Code, Cursor и GitHub Copilot, - становятся частью повседневного рабочего процесса. Они читают файлы, понимают кодовую базу и помогают писать код быстрее. Но есть проблема — они также могут читать .env-файлы. Читать

👀2

24 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC731 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#видео Пошаговый разбор работы с GitHub, необходимый каждому разработчику и тестировщику. В видео показан полный путь создания и первоначальной настройки удаленного репозитория для хранения и совместной работы над кодом. ▶️ Смотреть на YouTube

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @qa_sobes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,204
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 29,759
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,163
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Работа для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,762
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,109
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,905
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
IT Events 📆 АйТи События
@itevents · 17,317
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
IT - стажировки и обучение
@it_interns · 31,669
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QA собес | Тестирование” (@qa_sobes), 9,070 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qa_sobes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.