Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля

Channel

Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля

@qachanell

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,246subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001476465769
TypeChannel
Username@qachanell
DescriptionКанал Артема Русова. Автор курсов 🏆№1 по тестированию на Stepik (105+ тыс) и Youtubе (177+ тыс). Курсы learn.rusau.net/go/arubnk4 Материалы @qa_sklad Реклама @Rusau_admin Обучение @artsiom_qa Мои каналы telegram.me/addlist/74vzn4wLcTc2ZDYy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qachanell

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,20730,28130,2447 August 2026 — 30,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,213 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,222 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,219 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,218 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,222 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,221 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,218 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,220 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,234 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,236 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,235 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,245 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,244 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,242 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,238 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,233 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,280 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,281 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,272 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,270 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,277 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,275 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,273 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,259 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,252 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,261 subscribers5 September 2026 — 30,260 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,252 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,259 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,252 subscribers15 September 2026 — 30,239 subscribers17 September 2026 — 30,247 subscribers19 September 2026 — 30,246 subscribers30,2467 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,196–30,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:5630,246-1
17 Sept 2026, 05:0230,247+8
15 Sept 2026, 04:5730,239-13
13 Sept 2026, 14:1730,252-7
11 Sept 2026, 20:1630,259+7
9 Sept 2026, 07:5630,252-8
5 Sept 2026, 20:4030,260-1
3 Sept 2026, 17:0030,261+9
2 Sept 2026, 12:5730,252-7
1 Sept 2026, 10:0830,259-14
31 Aug 2026, 08:2630,273-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:5630,275-2
29 Aug 2026, 07:3530,277+7
28 Aug 2026, 05:5230,270-2
27 Aug 2026, 07:5430,272-9
26 Aug 2026, 05:4730,281+1
25 Aug 2026, 06:2230,280+47
24 Aug 2026, 09:2530,233-5
22 Aug 2026, 16:5730,238-4
21 Aug 2026, 08:0530,242first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.99%
avg views ÷ 30,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,020
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held102 (28 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total151,120
Reactions total2,587
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 13:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
809
Videos
288
Links
1,560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 56s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,044 reactions across 101 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,37239.2%
👍1,74928.9%
🔥97516.1%
💯5509.10%
😁2003.31%
👏1222.02%
😢330.546%
🌚250.414%
🤩180.298%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,044 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 102 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qachanell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,860 views65 reactionsread 22 September 2026

🍏Мое первое мобильное приложение доступно для загрузки в AppStore и получило название QA Learn. Прогресс на платформе Rusau Learn синхронизируется на всех устройствах. Все купленные курсы и активные подписки также включены. Для Google Play версия выйдет позже. По багам прошу писать сюда https://t.me/rusau_learn/338

👏37🔥1711

20 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,280 views37 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

17👍13💯7

20 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,150 viewsread 22 September 2026

Каждый раз, когда у меня спрашивают: а есть ли у тебя курсы для миддлов, то я записываю похожее голосовое сообщение. Вдруг и вам будет полезно.

20 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈2,320 views53 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Спустя три месяца активного использования клод кода меня немного отпустило. Ибо просыпался с открытой консолью, засыпал с ней, ел, что-то смотрел с ним на фоне и так далее 😂 У меня так иногда бывало с компьютерными играми, а вот сейчас с этим инструментом. Но как будто бы с большего, что хотел разработать, я уже сделал. И уже рука не тянется постоянно клодить. Как для себя, так и для моих студентов. Одна платформ

👍2615🔥7💯3🤩2

19 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC≈2,470 views104 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Что-то модно, что-то вышло из моды, а что-то вечно 😁

😁93🔥6🤩32

18 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,550 views33 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Совет от тестировщика 106/∞ : GET-запрос не должен менять состояние. Если ссылка вида /delete?id=5" удаляет запись при обычном переходе по ней, её выполнит и превью в мессенджере, и бот поисковика. Проверьте, что действия, меняющие данные, требуют POST и токен, а не просто клика по ссылке.

👍285

18 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈2,420 views17 reactionsread 22 September 2026

И еще одна маленькая новость: у платформы появилась группа в ТГ для общения и вопросов. Можно вступить, чтобы стать частью сообщества обучающихся тестировщиков :) https://t.me/rusau_learn

17

18 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,490 views42 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Несколько изменений на learn.rusau.net, которые вам понравятся: 1. Появилась система рефералок и пригласительных ссылок. Привели новых людей на платформу – получили дополнительную скидку на курсы и разные бонусы для кастомизации профиля. Больше людей – больше скидка. Пришли по ссылке друга – получили скидку на 10% на любую покупку в течение месяца. Применяется автоматом в корзине. Уже доступно в кабинете после ре

23🔥13👍6

17 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,400 views41 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Совет от тестировщика 105/∞ : Инъекции ищут не только в форме входа. Поиск, фильтры, сортировка по колонке, параметры в урле – туда тоже подставляют кавычки и спецсимволы SQL или NoSQL. Форма логина обычно и так проверена лучше всего, а вот боковые пути не всегда.

👍374

17 Sept 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,720 views57 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Все чаще стал замечать, что если у человека долго стоит плашка open to work в LinkedIn, то надо зайти к нему в историю комментариев и постов, а там сразу станет ясен корень проблемы – он просто мегатоксичный человек. И кто-то скажет, что это прямота или свобода слова в интернете, а я скажу, что как это не назови – это прямо влияет на ваше трудоустройство. Особенно, если вы делаете это постоянно и примелькались в ле

29💯18👍10

16 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,840 views47 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Совет от тестировщика 104/∞ : Двухфакторная аутентификация без доступа ко второму фактору. Телефон потерян, а смс с кодом не приходит. Проверьте запасной путь: резервные коды или обращение в поддержку. Не надо бысть уверенным, что пользователь всегда при телефоне.

🔥2716👍4

16 Sept 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,890 views27 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Тут Stepik наконец-то сделал так, чтобы студент мог видеть, что он покупает по авторской ссылке, а не сразу покупал "кота в мешке". Раньше человека сразу переводило на оплату, теперь же вы можете для начала ознакомиться с описанием курса, а уже потом принять решение о покупке. Напоминаю, что такое авторская ссылка и почему важно использовать ее? Комиссия Stepik при покупке курса из каталога, а не по авторской ссыл

27

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @qachanell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@qachanell edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,347
#1
📚 ProTestingInfo 🔷 Канал по тестированию 📚
@protestinginfo · 14,876
#2
Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,550
#3
Тестировщик | Вопросы собесов
@easy_qa_ru · 12,174
#4
Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 30,126
#5
Горящий Тестер 🐞 Антон Дуенин
@burning_tester · 5,682
#6
Тестировщики нужны
@qa_chillout · 10,587
#7
Становимся тестировщиком (QA)
@to_be_qa · 6,958
#8
QApedia | Тестирование
@qa_wiki · 12,952
#9
Джуны [Live]
@juniors_qa · 5,035
#10
QA Studio | Тестирование
@qa_studio · 9,150
#11
QA Юмор | Тестирование
@memes_qa · 4,257
#12
QA собес | Тестирование
@qa_sobes · 9,145
#13
QARocks. Тестировщик Рулит 🐞
@qarocks · 17,946
#14
Тестирование | TestGrow
@QAtestgrow · 5,281
#15
Заметки тестировщика | QA Notes
@qanote · 5,148
#16
Tester of QA
@testerofqa · 7,639
#17
Реальное тестирование | О работе тестировщика для новичков
@testinginreality · 2,528
#18
Ещё один канал про QA
@irina_sh_qa · 2,777
#19
Горящий Собес 📈 Собеседование QA
@burning_sobes · 3,506
#20
Автоматизация тестирования
@automatedqa · 8,867
#21
Automation QA | IT
@qa_automation_it · 5,033
#22
MobileApps - мобильное тестирование | Mobile QA
@QAMobileApps · 3,777
#23
Тестирование и жизнь • про работу для живых людей
@testing_and_life · 3,972
#24
SQL для тестировщика
@sql_for_qa · 6,287
#25
QA Юмор
@qahumor · 6,212
#26
SmartQA
@smart_qa · 2,438
#27
Short QA ideas
@short_QA · 4,487
#28
🧑‍💻 Уютное сообщество тестировщиков
@cozyqa · 7,945
#29
IT - стажировки и обучение
@it_interns · 31,464
#30
Библиотека тестировщика | QA, тестирование, quality assurance, manual testing, autotesting, ручное тестирование, автотесты
@testerlib · 9,020
#31
Junior QA to Dev
@QAtoDev · 3,534
#32
Тестировщик | Вакансии
@qa_testirovshchik_vakansii · 12,559
#33
QA AK
@QA_AKlimenko · 2,544
#34
QA❤️4Life | Testing | Тестирование ПО
@QA4Life · 7,880
#35
Lena and QA
@qabuggage · 2,292
#36
Библиотека тестировщика. QaRocks
@libqa · 11,993
#37
🐞Библиотека QA
@qa_lib · 5,990
#38
TESTOREST
@testorest · 2,460
#39
Собеседование тестировщика. QaRocks
@qasobes · 7,128
#40
QA_Road_channel
@qa_road_channel · 6,882
#41
Ужасно медленная QA
@QA_with_a_spoon · 2,416
#42
QA Jobs | Работа для тестировщика
@qa_work · 11,087
#43
Русова о QA
@rusovaqa · 1,626
#44
Testing | QA
@qa_and_it · 2,945
#45
Геннадий Чурсов | QA++
@chursovQA · 4,142
#46
Все про QA | Pro-Test.studio
@Pro_Test_studio · 1,065
#47
Evgeniy Kornyshev: Automated Testing
@kornyshev_evgeniy · 2,120
#48
QA Вакансии. Работа для тестировщиков. QaRocks
@jobforqa · 14,845
#49
Тестировщик | IT
@testirovanie_ru · 4,874
#50
Nezha Kas | Глава: Лондон
@nezhaview · 1,483
#51
Lil Bug Hunters - QA
@LilBugHunters · 2,067
#52
Очень интересно, только плакать хочется
@interesting_but_wanna_cry · 3,540
#53
Леша Маршал | IT
@leshamarshal · 4,883
#54
Алексей | AQA PROKA4
@qa_proka4 · 3,378
#55
Книги для тестировщика 📚 Библиотека тестировщика
@qabackup · 5,191
#56
Работа для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,393
#57
Заметки о QA
@notes_about_QA · 3,621
#58
Alfa QA Talks
@AlfaQATalks · 3,190
#59
Yet another QA
@yetanotherqa · 6,506
#60
👩🏻‍💻 QA, Барселона и Оксана
@oksana_it_switcher · 1,539
#61
Вакансии по QA — тестирование, manual testing, autotests
@testerrjob · 8,064
#62
Fix_and_go
@bugandgo · 1,255
#63
QA.GURU — школа автоматизации тестирования
@qa_guru · 2,546
#64
QA Memes
@qa_memes · 4,042
#65
Оповещения по курсам от protestinginfo
@info_course_protestinginfo · 801
#66
Programmer & IT Memes
@itmemes · 123,509
#67
Роман Цакунов | ПРО АВТОТЕСТЫ
@rvtsakunov · 3,298
#68
Про QA
@pro_qa · 1,059
#69
Rozetked
@rozetked · 656,361
#70
JS Automation | Anatoly Karpovich
@jsAnatolyKarpovich · 1,782
#71
QA Live 🚩 Тестирование ПО
@qa_Iive · 3,332
#72
Тестировщик со вкусом
@testinglib · 4,734
#73
Валерий | AQA Engineer | Автотестирование на Python | REST, gRPC, GraphQL
@AQA_Engineer · 1,494
#74
QA Family by Alexey
@dev_qa · 1,628
#75
Словарь тестировщика | Тестирование
@qadictionary · 3,717
#76
ProQuality Community
@ProQuality_Community · 2,838
#77
podQAst - подкаст для тестировщиков
@pod_qast · 2,663
#78
Eddy Tester | Тестировщик Эд
@eddytester · 1,507
#79
Ленивый тестировщик
@lazyqa · 249
#80
сКлад QA
@sKlad_QA · 1,791
#81
QA Jobs
@qa_chillout_jobs · 8,421
#82
Вакансии QA Engineer/Тестировщикам
@qa_jobs_rabota · 5,507
#83
QA Вакансии & Работа для тестировщиков
@YotolabQA · 8,412
#84
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,530
#85
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#86
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#87
Тестировщик | Тесты
@easy_qa_tests · 6,059
#88
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#89
QA Community
@QAcommunityNEWS · 4,746
#90
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,041,128
#91
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,347
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Серьезный тестировщик 🐞
@serious_tester · 30,126
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,550
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
IT - стажировки и обучение
@it_interns · 31,464
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,530
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
Stepik – онлайн-курсы
@stepik_courses · 24,445
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля” (@qachanell), 30,246 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qachanell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.