Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Серьезный тестировщик 🐞

Channel

Серьезный тестировщик 🐞

@serious_tester

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,126subscribers

-280 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001127737843
TypeChannel
Username@serious_tester
DescriptionДля тестировщиков и QA. Мы в max.ru/serious_tester @qa_ru - русскоговорящее сообщество @qa_automation - для автоматизаторов @qa_jobs - вакансии и поиск работы @qa_bad_company - про компании @qa_fin - про деньги Сотрудничество: @srtest № 4776953136
Created20 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/serious_tester

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,12630,40630,2666 August 2026 — 30,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,405 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,393 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,390 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,388 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,386 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,387 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,383 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,380 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,365 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,353 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,349 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,347 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,339 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,334 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,331 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,310 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,297 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,288 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,273 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,265 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,259 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,254 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,249 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,247 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,238 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,226 subscribers7 September 2026 — 30,213 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30,192 subscribers12 September 2026 — 30,176 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,168 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,150 subscribers18 September 2026 — 30,126 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -280. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,084–30,448 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:1830,126-24
16 Sept 2026, 04:0130,150-18
14 Sept 2026, 07:2030,168-8
12 Sept 2026, 18:1730,176-16
10 Sept 2026, 17:3930,192-21
7 Sept 2026, 13:4030,213-13
4 Sept 2026, 13:1630,226-12
2 Sept 2026, 23:3630,238-9
1 Sept 2026, 22:2630,247-2
1 Sept 2026, 00:3730,249-5
30 Aug 2026, 22:2430,254-5
30 Aug 2026, 00:2830,259-6
28 Aug 2026, 04:2530,265-8
27 Aug 2026, 04:5630,273-15
26 Aug 2026, 07:0230,288-9
25 Aug 2026, 04:2330,297-13
24 Aug 2026, 00:5630,310-21
22 Aug 2026, 10:0330,331-3
21 Aug 2026, 03:3730,334-5
20 Aug 2026, 06:0530,339first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 30,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,540
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held40 (11 July 202620 September 2026)
Views total71,940
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 00:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
235
Videos
84
Links
2,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serious_tester. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
7.50%
3 of 40 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,840
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,690
over 37 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvEBijV14 September 20264 September 2026
2VtzqwrrRJr123 July 202623 July 2026
2VtzqxXfpqx114 July 202614 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Где в IT зарплаты растут быстрее всего в 2026 году Читать...

15 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC≈5,940 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Найм умирает. Может, теперь делать свой продукт не такая уж плохая идея? Читать...

12 Sept 2026, 07:53 UTC≈7,530 viewsread 22 September 2026

Я попал к психиатру из‑за кодинга с AI Читать...

10 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈7,480 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Рынок IT-вакансий сломался и ничего не понятно? А ведь за изучение таких процессов в 2010 году дали Нобелевскую премию Читать...

9 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC≈6,960 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Шпаргалка «Основы тестирования ПО». Часть 1 Читать...

7 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC≈6,690 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Как проверить компанию до собеседования: мой чек-лист из 7 шагов Читать...

4 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC≈7,540 viewsread 22 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvEBijVPhoto

⌨ Команда тестирования тратит слишком много времени на создание автотестов, а автоматизация не успевает за разработкой? На вебинаре покажем, как с помощью ИИ пройти путь от тест-кейса до готового автотеста за 10 минут и разберём, какие этапы тестирования можно ускорить в разы. ⌨ На практикуме разберём: — как быстро превратить тест-кейс в готовый автотест; — как меняется работа инженера по тестированию; — как ИИ ст

2 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC≈5,520 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Стоит ли опытному ИТ‑специалисту преподавать в вузе? Мой опыт, финансовая сторона и инструкция Читать...

29 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈7,240 viewsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Почему оркестр не играет без дирижёра, а команда — без QA и менеджера Читать...

27 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈7,500 viewsread 22 September 2026

ИИ-агент вместо тестировщика: 20 копеек за диалог и причина, почему вас не заменит llm Читать...

23 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈6,940 viewsread 22 September 2026

Вас не уволили. Почему после сокращений уходят те, кого компания хотела сохранить Читать...

22 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈7,450 viewsread 22 September 2026

Дефект как источник информации о продуктовом риске Читать...

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @serious_tester. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,550
#1
Tester of QA
@testerofqa · 7,639
#2
QApedia | Тестирование
@qa_wiki · 12,952
#3
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,246
#4
Тестировщики нужны
@qa_chillout · 10,587
#5
QA Юмор | Тестирование
@memes_qa · 4,257
#6
QA Юмор
@qahumor · 6,212
#7
QA собес | Тестирование
@qa_sobes · 9,145
#8
Тестировщик | Вопросы собесов
@easy_qa_ru · 12,174
#9
Тестирование и жизнь • про работу для живых людей
@testing_and_life · 3,972
#10
Автоматизация тестирования
@automatedqa · 8,867
#11
QA Memes
@qa_memes · 4,042
#12
QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,347
#13
Automation QA | IT
@qa_automation_it · 5,033
#14
📚 ProTestingInfo 🔷 Канал по тестированию 📚
@protestinginfo · 14,876
#15
QARocks. Тестировщик Рулит 🐞
@qarocks · 17,946
#16
Библиотека тестировщика. QaRocks
@libqa · 11,993
#17
🧑‍💻 Уютное сообщество тестировщиков
@cozyqa · 7,945
#18
Alfa QA Talks
@AlfaQATalks · 3,190
#19
Short QA ideas
@short_QA · 4,487
#20
SQL для тестировщика
@sql_for_qa · 6,287
#21
Становимся тестировщиком (QA)
@to_be_qa · 6,958
#22
IT Юмор
@ithumor · 60,490
#23
Библиотека тестировщика | QA, тестирование, quality assurance, manual testing, autotesting, ручное тестирование, автотесты
@testerlib · 9,020
#24
🐞Библиотека QA
@qa_lib · 5,990
#25
QA❤️4Life | Testing | Тестирование ПО
@QA4Life · 7,880
#26
QA Jobs | Работа для тестировщика
@qa_work · 11,087
#27
Programmer & IT Memes
@itmemes · 123,509
#28
Yet another QA
@yetanotherqa · 6,506
#29
Тестировщик | IT
@testirovanie_ru · 4,874
#30
Тестировщик со вкусом
@testinglib · 4,734
#31
Ужасно медленная QA
@QA_with_a_spoon · 2,416
#32
Книги для тестировщика 📚 Библиотека тестировщика
@qabackup · 5,191
#33
🇺🇦 automation-remarks.com
@automation_remarks_ua · 7,654
#34
Собеседование тестировщика. QaRocks
@qasobes · 7,128
#35
Работа для тестировщиков. QA
@qajoboffer · 20,393
#36
QA Вакансии & Работа для тестировщиков
@YotolabQA · 8,412
#37
QA Studio | Тестирование
@qa_studio · 9,150
#38
Rozetked
@rozetked · 656,361
#39
QA Live 🚩 Тестирование ПО
@qa_Iive · 3,332
#40
QA.GURU — школа автоматизации тестирования
@qa_guru · 2,546
#41
QA Вакансии. Работа для тестировщиков. QaRocks
@jobforqa · 14,845
#42
QA Family by Alexey
@dev_qa · 1,628
#43
Заметки тестировщика | QA Notes
@qanote · 5,148
#44
Горящий Тестер 🐞 Антон Дуенин
@burning_tester · 5,682
#45
Тестирование | TestGrow
@QAtestgrow · 5,281
#46
Ещё один канал про QA
@irina_sh_qa · 2,777
#47
Test IT TMS
@testit_tms · 1,584
#48
MobileApps - мобильное тестирование | Mobile QA
@QAMobileApps · 3,777
#49
Заметки о QA
@notes_about_QA · 3,621
#50
Junior QA to Dev
@QAtoDev · 3,534
#51
Testing | QA
@qa_and_it · 2,945
#52
Русова о QA
@rusovaqa · 1,626
#53
ProQuality Community
@ProQuality_Community · 2,838
#54
Джуны [Live]
@juniors_qa · 5,035
#55
Реальное тестирование | О работе тестировщика для новичков
@testinginreality · 2,528
#56
Горящий Собес 📈 Собеседование QA
@burning_sobes · 3,506
#57
Хабр
@habr_com · 132,465
#58
NoBugs
@nobugs_me · 2,651
#59
Lena and QA
@qabuggage · 2,292
#60
SmartQA
@smart_qa · 2,438
#61
Типичный программист
@tproger · 78,569
#62
QA Dojo | Про управление качеством
@qadojo_ru · 836
#63
Типичный QA
@typical_qa · 2,176
#64
Геннадий Чурсов | QA++
@chursovQA · 4,142
#65
Алексей | AQA PROKA4
@qa_proka4 · 3,378
#66
iOS Automation Testing
@ios_automation_testing · 2,014
#67
QA_Road_channel
@qa_road_channel · 6,882
#68
QA Community
@QAcommunityNEWS · 4,746
#69
Heisenbug — канал конференции
@heisenbug_channel · 1,310
#70
Вакансии по QA — тестирование, manual testing, autotests
@testerrjob · 8,064
#71
Java Memes → АйТи мемес
@java_memes · 6,152
#72
Тестировщик | Вакансии
@qa_testirovshchik_vakansii · 12,559
#73
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,530
#74
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#75
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,509
#76
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,094,211
#77
Очень интересно, только плакать хочется
@interesting_but_wanna_cry · 3,540
#78
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,603,481
#79
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 235,414
#80
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#81
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 806,604
#82
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#83
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#84
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#85
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 838,100
#86
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,041,128
#87
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,921
#88
🌚Пятисотые на проде😱
@code500 · 10,775
#89
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#90
Лентач
@oldlentach · 261,296
#91
Пикабу
@pikabu · 256,113
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тестировщик от бога
@godoftesting · 29,550
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
QA Sklad - Склад тестировщика
@qa_sklad · 23,347
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,246
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Job for QA
@forallqa · 22,530
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
IT - стажировки и обучение
@it_interns · 31,464
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Серьезный тестировщик 🐞” (@serious_tester), 30,126 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serious_tester.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.