Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SKILLZOR

Channel

SKILLZOR

@ropz

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

50,747subscribers

-691 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258459047
TypeChannel
Usernames@ropz @skillz0r1337
Created22 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ropz

Growth

50,74751,43851,092.57 August 2026 — 51,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 51,429 subscribers8 August 2026 — 51,399 subscribers9 August 2026 — 51,391 subscribers10 August 2026 — 51,362 subscribers11 August 2026 — 51,338 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,304 subscribers13 August 2026 — 51,265 subscribers15 August 2026 — 51,221 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,158 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,126 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,047 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,993 subscribers23 August 2026 — 50,946 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,904 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,880 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,856 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,882 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,859 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,828 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,835 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,820 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,788 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,747 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 27 days, net -691. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,643–51,542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:1450,747-41
2 Sept 2026, 01:2650,788-32
31 Aug 2026, 22:0650,820-15
31 Aug 2026, 00:3750,835+7
30 Aug 2026, 03:4550,828-31
29 Aug 2026, 02:5450,859-23
27 Aug 2026, 23:2550,882+26
27 Aug 2026, 02:0650,856-24
26 Aug 2026, 01:3250,880-24
25 Aug 2026, 00:2750,904-42
23 Aug 2026, 12:5550,946-47
21 Aug 2026, 23:1850,993-37
20 Aug 2026, 19:1551,030-17
19 Aug 2026, 20:5351,047-45
18 Aug 2026, 18:5751,092-34
17 Aug 2026, 19:1551,126-32
16 Aug 2026, 19:5851,158-63
15 Aug 2026, 09:4351,221-44
13 Aug 2026, 23:3551,265-39
12 Aug 2026, 15:5751,304first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 50,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,500
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held35 (4 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total277,540
Reactions total3,243
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8,174 reactions across 35 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53438250802143742035,36765.7%
custom 53932885392301960452,52330.9%
💩2843.47%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 35 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ropz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTC≈3,510 views50 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 ДОКА АПАЕМ РАНК ДО ДИВАЙНА

custom 534382508021437420344custom 53932885392301960454💩2

1 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC≈8,930 views154 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

ВАТС ГИФКИ НА ТВИЧЕ ДОБАВИЛИ 🤯

custom 5343825080214374203139💩9custom 53932885392301960456

28 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈19,200 views187 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

все постят процентиль какой-то у меня хайп?

custom 5343825080214374203173custom 539328853923019604512💩2

27 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC≈20,500 views227 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

батечка дал подышать сегодня 🙏 спасибо всем кто смотрел

custom 5393288539230196045186custom 534382508021437420332💩9

27 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈17,100 views179 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Гта 6 топ ебанутый ждем всей семьей

custom 5343825080214374203155custom 539328853923019604516💩8

27 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈17,500 views331 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

на его анонс гта4 умоляю

custom 5393288539230196045280custom 534382508021437420347💩4

25 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC≈20,000 views217 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

почти 10 часов доты спустя 2 года перерыва 💀

custom 5393288539230196045183custom 534382508021437420327💩7

22 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈21,600 views279 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

сегодня после матчей. Вадя67 - МаксПивосос - ЮляТиктокерша и 🤫. харда комбекается на ваших экранах

custom 5343825080214374203243custom 539328853923019604527💩9

21 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈19,100 views107 reactionsread 3 September 2026

после матча хайп на канале всем быть

custom 534382508021437420391custom 539328853923019604512💩4

19 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈20,600 views163 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

сегодня стримчик,глянем эксайла нови видик

custom 5343825080214374203141custom 539328853923019604512💩10

17 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈18,500 views155 reactionsread 3 September 2026

цуефа могнул чат 🤣

custom 5343825080214374203131💩12custom 539328853923019604512

15 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈19,500 views237 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5343825080214374203189custom 539328853923019604535💩13

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @ropz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTCAnonymous Poll4,030 voters approx.

будет ли срач на турике?

  1. да70%
  2. да68%

The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

des0ut
@des0ut · 36,080
#1
Ликс
@dmlixxx · 368,251
#2
я gaechka 🕵️‍♂️
@gaechkatm · 57,758
#3
СтрогоБогСтавок
@strogostavit · 269,624
#4
Морфи или мерфи?
@morpheyaa · 189,862
#5
MaxBetov
@burdakekw · 126,490
#6
40
@lix2004 · 100,483
#7
by_Bet 🦇
@jujunanal · 18,610
#8
НОС БЕТ
@Zanos192 · 407,401
#9
монке)
@pitersquad · 1,433
#10
BAN VLOVEVS
@vlovevsban · 3,591
#11
Davay Po Novoy
@davaypotg · 7,276
#12
FREAK
@freak192 · 64,537
#13
by_owl
@byowl · 146,027
#14
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 264,914
#15
EVELONE 1️⃣9️⃣2️⃣
@evelone192gg · 1,118,314
#16
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,202,813
#17
Дневник Симпла
@s1mplegod123 · 248,422
#18
помойка бай овл
@by_pomoika · 22,132
#19
ZLOYn
@zloy · 197,082
#20
Улей Пчёлкина 🐝
@alexeeeeey · 32,384
#21
Перезаливы стримов
@fullstreamers2 · 26,243
#22
yuuechka
@yueechka · 71,360
#23
GENSYXA
@gensyka · 271,753
#24
Офис Стила | steel streams
@steelstaya · 214,066
#25
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 498,336
#26
ФУЛЫ СТРИМЕРОВ
@fullstreamers · 7,417
#27
FREAKS
@freaktwitch · 5,837
#28
кап кап кап
@brksyolo · 13,346
#29
УМОМ🧠
@ymombet · 12,028
#30
AUNKERE
@aunkeretg · 141,682
#31
heliN139 💀
@heleNyssss · 121,410
#32
Агрошкольник
@quickhuntik · 14,077
#33
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,424,581
#34
ct0m
@ct0m · 204,999
#35
Бустероид 🥋🥊
@busteroid3000 · 444,025
#36
ДИНА БЛИН
@dinablin · 37,275
#37
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,402,282
#38
chr1swave
@chr1swav · 33,314
#39
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 312,193
#40
Мокривский завали ебало
@mokrivskiy · 429,637
#41
НМШ
@nmshhub · 724,467
#42
m0NESY NEWS
@m0NESYGG · 126,016
#43
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА
@raiznews · 529,156
#44
M0NESY LIFE
@m0NESY13 · 255,533
#45
кубаха)
@qbaxa · 13,095
#46
korya_mc
@korya_mc · 110,630
#47
не джибойс
@gboys420 · 4,764
#48
малый
@prostomaluy · 4,023
#49
deko_O
@dekocsoff · 225,485
#50
Nix
@nixtalk · 263,129
#51
GUN5
@gun5esports · 63,107
#52
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2
@newcsgo · 580,079
#53
Равшан Джульпаев
@RavshanNstream · 354,511
#54
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 383,519
#55
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,053,811
#56
Вишенка 🍒
@mamavisshenka · 117,910
#57
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 328,032
#58
leva2k
@lev_streams · 95,106
#59
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,928
#60
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 275,138
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

des0ut
@des0ut · 36,080
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
StariyBonus
@stariybinus · 40,263
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
ДИНА БЛИН
@dinablin · 37,275
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
yuuechka
@yueechka · 71,360
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
Стипикопи 🚁
@steepkop · 35,246
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
fANDER
@fandertg · 35,362
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SKILLZOR” (@ropz), 50,747 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ropz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.