Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SKILLZOR

Channel

SKILLZOR

@ropz

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,218subscribers

-2,220 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258459047
TypeChannel
Usernames@ropz @skillz0r1337
Descriptionhttps://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337
Created22 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ropz

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,21851,43850,3287 August 2026 — 51,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 51,429 subscribers8 August 2026 — 51,399 subscribers9 August 2026 — 51,391 subscribers10 August 2026 — 51,362 subscribers11 August 2026 — 51,338 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,304 subscribers13 August 2026 — 51,265 subscribers15 August 2026 — 51,221 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,158 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,126 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,047 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,993 subscribers23 August 2026 — 50,946 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,904 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,880 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,856 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,882 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,859 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,828 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,835 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,820 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,788 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,747 subscribers5 September 2026 — 50,721 subscribers8 September 2026 — 50,638 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,583 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,526 subscribers14 September 2026 — 50,480 subscribers16 September 2026 — 50,434 subscribers19 September 2026 — 50,337 subscribers25 September 2026 — 50,171 subscribers4 October 2026 — 49,826 subscribers8 October 2026 — 49,593 subscribers13 October 2026 — 49,472 subscribers14 October 2026 — 49,449 subscribers15 October 2026 — 49,403 subscribers16 October 2026 — 49,367 subscribers17 October 2026 — 49,334 subscribers18 October 2026 — 49,283 subscribers19 October 2026 — 49,262 subscribers20 October 2026 — 49,218 subscribers7 August 202620 October 2026
44 measurements spanning 75 days, net -2,220. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,885–51,771 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Oct 2026, 22:2149,218-44
19 Oct 2026, 19:0949,262-21
18 Oct 2026, 20:2149,283-51
17 Oct 2026, 18:0849,334-33
16 Oct 2026, 14:3749,367-36
15 Oct 2026, 14:5749,403-46
14 Oct 2026, 16:0849,449-23
13 Oct 2026, 03:1449,472-121
8 Oct 2026, 17:2049,593-233
4 Oct 2026, 08:4149,826-345
25 Sept 2026, 17:3650,171-166
19 Sept 2026, 00:1750,337-97
16 Sept 2026, 16:1850,434-46
14 Sept 2026, 16:5750,480-46
13 Sept 2026, 03:5850,526-57
11 Sept 2026, 07:1950,583-55
8 Sept 2026, 08:2250,638-83
5 Sept 2026, 03:5950,721-26
3 Sept 2026, 09:1450,747-41
2 Sept 2026, 01:2650,788first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 49,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,870
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held85 (4 July 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total338,459
Reactions total3,994
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Oct 2026, 00:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈30
Links
≈360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

14,476 reactions across 85 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53438250802143742039,19763.5%
custom 53932885392301960453,74625.9%
💩1,53310.6%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,476 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
60
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 85 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ropz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,720 views31 reactionsread 22 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 120 ФПС ТЕПЕРЬ ТОЧНО СМОТРИМ НА КАЧЕСТВЕННУЮ ДОТУ

custom 534382508021437420329💩2

21 Oct 2026, 01:53 UTC≈7,240 views119 reactions1 Starread 22 October 2026

ебать стрим сказка,затащили катки,выпало 2 снайпера за 10 кейсов,нот ми зашел в чатик,иду спать,завтра ебашим эту харду идём к титану потихоньку

custom 5343825080214374203116💩3

20 Oct 2026, 19:48 UTC≈2,510 views26 reactionsread 21 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 120 ФПС СТРИМ ТЕСТ

custom 534382508021437420323💩3

19 Oct 2026, 19:05 UTC≈2,700 views26 reactionsread 20 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 СПЛЕТНИ С ДР ШАДОКЕКА КОМУ НАБИЛИ ЕБАЛО КОМУ НЕТ 🤪

custom 534382508021437420323💩3

17 Oct 2026, 22:27 UTC≈3,540 views37 reactions1 Starread 18 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 ДОТА ЕБЕТСЯ ЧУТЬ ПОТОМ СОН

custom 534382508021437420334💩3

17 Oct 2026, 17:37 UTC≈13,800 views86 reactions1 Starread 22 October 2026

Сегодня без бк все играют хуйню 😭

custom 534382508021437420371💩15

16 Oct 2026, 20:52 UTC≈3,000 views27 reactionsread 17 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 ОНЛАЙН

custom 534382508021437420325💩2

15 Oct 2026, 22:38 UTC819 views3 reactionsread 15 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 СТАРТУЕМ ДОКУ

custom 53438250802143742033

15 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC≈17,500 views146 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

рапидар,дальше меньше 🥳

custom 5343825080214374203137💩9

14 Oct 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,760 views22 reactionsread 14 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 <— ХОЧЕШЬ ТАК ЖЕ ?

custom 534382508021437420320💩2

14 Oct 2026, 20:27 UTC≈16,200 views106 reactions1 Starread 22 October 2026

интересно в некст году в параллель все турниры в мире будут?

custom 5343825080214374203100💩6

12 Oct 2026, 21:27 UTC≈1,500 views21 reactionsread 12 October 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/skillz0r1337 doka

custom 534382508021437420319💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @ropz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTCAnonymous Poll4,040 voters approx.

будет ли срач на турике?

  1. да70%
  2. да68%

The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

des0ut
@des0ut · 35,563
#1
Ликс
@dmlixxx · 363,060
#2
я gaechka 🕵️‍♂️
@gaechkatm · 56,965
#3
СтрогоБогСтавок
@strogostavit · 252,350
#4
Морфи или мерфи?
@morpheyaa · 193,415
#5
MaxBetov
@burdakekw · 121,587
#6
40
@lix2004 · 97,485
#7
by_Bet 🦇
@jujunanal · 18,024
#8
НОС БЕТ
@Zanos192 · 392,135
#9
монке)
@pitersquad · 1,510
#10
BAN VLOVEVS
@vlovevsban · 3,436
#11
Davay Po Novoy
@davaypotg · 7,343
#12
FREAK
@freak192 · 64,801
#13
by_owl
@byowl · 145,551
#14
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 268,655
#15
EVELONE 1️⃣9️⃣2️⃣
@evelone192gg · 1,091,358
#16
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,234,663
#17
Дневник Симпла
@s1mplegod123 · 243,779
#18
помойка бай овл
@by_pomoika · 22,411
#19
ZLOYn
@zloy · 193,761
#20
Улей Пчёлкина 🐝
@alexeeeeey · 31,616
#21
Перезаливы стримов
@fullstreamers2 · 25,791
#22
yuuechka
@yueechka · 79,214
#23
GENSYXA
@gensyka · 274,037
#24
Офис Стила | steel streams
@steelstaya · 211,728
#25
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 489,436
#26
ФУЛЫ СТРИМЕРОВ
@fullstreamers · 7,304
#27
FREAKS
@freaktwitch · 5,811
#28
кап кап кап
@brksyolo · 16,276
#29
УМОМ🧠
@ymombet · 11,754
#30
AUNKERE
@aunkeretg · 172,028
#31
heliN139 💀
@heleNyssss · 120,057
#32
Агрошкольник
@quickhuntik · 13,708
#33
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,196
#34
ct0m
@ct0m · 210,891
#35
Бустероид 🥋🥊
@busteroid3000 · 462,983
#36
ДИНА БЛИН
@dinablin · 36,362
#37
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,450,097
#38
chr1swave
@chr1swav · 34,870
#39
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 307,374
#40
Мокривский завали ебало
@mokrivskiy · 406,950
#41
НМШ
@nmshhub · 699,562
#42
m0NESY NEWS
@m0NESYGG · 123,705
#43
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА
@raiznews · 510,633
#44
M0NESY LIFE
@m0NESY13 · 253,576
#45
кубаха)
@qbaxa · 15,532
#46
korya_mc
@korya_mc · 109,063
#47
не джибойс
@gboys420 · 4,621
#48
малый
@prostomaluy · 3,637
#49
deko_O
@dekocsoff · 228,662
#50
Nix
@nixtalk · 258,775
#51
Coming soon ⌛️
@gun5esports · 60,027
#52
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2
@newcsgo · 583,711
#53
Равшан Джульпаев
@RavshanNstream · 355,375
#54
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 377,448
#55
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,054,506
#56
Вишенка 🍒
@mamavisshenka · 119,668
#57
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 333,504
#58
leva2k
@lev_streams · 97,746
#59
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,330
#60
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 269,777
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

строгочмо
@strogo228 · 440,920
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
des0ut
@des0ut · 35,563
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
StariyBonus
@stariybinus · 38,740
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
Перезаливы стримов
@fullstreamers2 · 25,791
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
Улей Пчёлкина 🐝
@alexeeeeey · 31,616
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
Iceberggg
@icebergtut · 20,472
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
ДИНА БЛИН
@dinablin · 36,362
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
yuuechka
@yueechka · 79,214
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
Диана Rolls Royce
@DianaRice · 42,187
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
chr1swave
@chr1swav · 34,870
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
🏴‍☠️ Fasoollka 🏴‍☠️
@fassoollkaa · 24,594
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 September 2026
skezzzxc
@skezzzxcc · 37,305
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 8 September 2026
планета Жопа
@planetapopa · 73,227
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 September 2026
Стипикопи 🚁
@steepkop · 37,657
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
CS.MONEY
@csmoney_trade · 76,830
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
fANDER
@fandertg · 39,152
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SKILLZOR” (@ropz), 49,218 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ropz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.