Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روائع الأدب الروسي

Channel

روائع الأدب الروسي

@ru_dn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,225subscribers

+80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001910260145
TypeChannel
Username@ru_dn
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ru_dn

Growth

26,14526,22526,1856 August 2026 — 26,145 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,152 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,166 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,176 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,172 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,171 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,160 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,159 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,185 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,180 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,188 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,185 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,176 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,194 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,210 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,211 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,222 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,206 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,205 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,209 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,215 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,225 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net +80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,133–26,237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 13:3826,225+10
29 Aug 2026, 14:0726,215+6
28 Aug 2026, 16:1226,209+4
27 Aug 2026, 14:0726,205-1
26 Aug 2026, 16:1926,206-16
25 Aug 2026, 14:4526,222+11
24 Aug 2026, 17:5426,211+1
23 Aug 2026, 04:5726,210+16
21 Aug 2026, 15:4726,194+18
20 Aug 2026, 15:4526,176-9
19 Aug 2026, 16:1526,185-3
18 Aug 2026, 19:1326,188+8
17 Aug 2026, 20:0726,180-5
16 Aug 2026, 18:1926,185+20
15 Aug 2026, 04:1326,165+6
13 Aug 2026, 17:5626,159-1
12 Aug 2026, 13:1526,160-11
11 Aug 2026, 09:5326,171-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:3426,172-4
9 Aug 2026, 06:1126,176first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.73%
avg views ÷ 26,225 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,290
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

956 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
63966.8%
💔11211.7%
👍606.28%
💯505.23%
🕊394.08%
❤‍🔥171.78%
🔥141.46%
👏131.36%
😘70.732%
🤣30.314%
🆒20.209%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 956reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ru_dn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC≈2,290 views52 reactionsread 30 August 2026

"ﻻ أُحب البشَر! وأيُّ بشر هُم إذا كانوا ﻻ يَقْدرون على أن يُساعد بعضُهم بعضًا، يا لَهم من بشر! إنهم نِعاج أمام القَوي، ذِئاب في وجْه الضّعيف! حتى الذئاب تعيش أَسرابًا، أمّا الناس فيعيش كلٌّ بمُفرده، ويُبغِض بعضُهم بعضا! آه، ما أكثر ما رأيتُ، وما أَرى اﻵن، ليتهم يَهلكُون جميعا! إنهم يَلِدُون أطفاﻻ وﻻ يستطيعون تربيّتَهم، أهذا هو الصَّواب؟" — مكسيم غوركي

38👏5💔5👍4

19 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC≈3,590 views29 reactionsread 30 August 2026

تقودني الظروف في بعض الأحيان إلى الاطلاع على ترجمات عربية لأعمال روسية عن لغة وسيطة (الإنجليزية غالبًا)، وفي كل مرة أول ما يستوقفني (حتى في حالة جودة الترجمة العربية عن اللغة الوسيطة) أن كل التفاصيل المتعلقة بالمجتمع الروسي في النص تضيع تمامًا: مثلًا درجات الوظائف الرسمية، نوعيات المدارس الروسية، أسماء الثياب ونوعياتها... أي شيء له خصوصية واضحة في المجتمع الروسي يزول من هذه الترجمات الوسيطة. وفي أوقات أخرى اطلعت على

💯176👍6

5 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈4,080 views27 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

التوبة من أجل النشر! جودت هوشيار خضع الأدب في الاتحاد السوفيتي لعقود طويلة لرقابة أيديولوجية صارمة، وكان الطريق إلى النشر يمر غالباً عبر الالتزام بمبادئ «الواقعية الاشتراكية» التي فرضتها الدولة مذهباً أدبياً رسمياً. وكان يُنتظر من الكاتب أن يقدم صورة متفائلة عن المجتمع الاشتراكي ومستقبله، وأن يتجنب كل ما يمكن أن يُفهم على أنه تشكيك في النظام أو نقد له. وقد سعت السلطة إلى إخضاع الأدباء والفنانين لهذا التوجه بمزيج من

17👍8🆒2

10 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC≈4,710 views18 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

إيفان بونين: نوبل المنفى واحتفال الروح الروسية بالحياة في 9 نوفمبر/تشرين الثاني 1933 مُنح الكاتب الروسي إيفان بونين جائزة نوبل في الأدب، ليصبح أول كاتب روسي ينال هذا التكريم. وقد مُنحت له الجائزة «عن موهبته الفنية التي أعاد بها في النثر تشكيل الشخصية الروسية النموذجية». لكن لجنة نوبل واجهت صعوبة في تحديد وضعه القانوني بوصفه مواطناً، فخرج الوصف بشكل غير متماسك: «شخص بلا جنسية، يقيم في فرنسا». وقد علّق بونين بأسى عل

18

5 Jun 2026, 00:12 UTC≈4,490 views37 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

في عمر الثالثة والعشرين، وحين كان يقضي فترة نفيه بسبب قصائده السياسية ومواقفة المدمرة كتب ألكسندر بوشكين هذه الرسالة لأخيه الأصغر ليف، يقدم له فيها بعض النصائح الممزوجة بمرارة تجاربه الشخصية رسالة أ. س. بوشكين إلى ل. س. بوشكين ​سبتمبر (بعد 4) — أكتوبر (قبل 6) 1822 م. من كيشيناو إلى بطرسبورغ. ​أنت في السن التي يجب فيها على المرء أن يفكر في المسيرة المهنّية التي سيسلكها، لقد أخبرتك بالأسباب التي تجعلني أرى السلك الع

33👍2🕊2

2 Jun 2026, 05:33 UTC≈2,920 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @audiobooks_new

لعشاق الأدب الروسي - الأدب الإنساني والواقعي.. هذه مجموعة من القنوات.. أضغط على النص للدخول للقناة ⬇️ 🔵فيودور دوستويفسكي 🔵أنطون تشيخوف 🔵ليو تولستوي 🟣ارشيف روائع الأدب الروسي

6🕊4

1 Jun 2026, 21:40 UTC≈3,560 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
File

360 ص مختارات من الآدب الروسي في القرنين الثامن عشر والتاسع عشر

9

1 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,050 views43 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

‏في العالم العربي، تحولت أسماء فيودور دوستويفسكي وليف تولستوي وأنطون تشيخوف ومكسيم غوركي إلى الواجهة شبه الوحيدة للأدب الروسي حتى صار القارئ العربي يختزل روسيا الأدبية كلها في الروايات الوجودية الثقيلة والفقراء والثلوج والأسئلة النفسية هذه الهيمنة صنعتها الترجمة المبكرة والذائقة الثقافية فدوستويفسكي جذب القراء بقلقه الروحي، وتولستوي بعظمته الإنسانية، وتشيخوف برقته الفنية، وغوركي بحضوره الثوري. لكن نتيجة ذلك أن كثير

35💯7👍1

29 May 2026, 10:50 UTC≈4,200 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥63👍1

13 May 2026, 11:44 UTC≈6,340 views85 reactionsread 30 August 2026

واحدةٌ من أسخف الخرافات وأكثرها ضررًا أن يشعر المرء بالخزي من تغيير قناعاته. ِإن تغيير القناعات لا يدعو إلى الخزي ؛ فمغزى الحياة يقوم على فهم يتزايد يومًا بعد يوم للنفس وللعالم ، أمّا العار الحقيقي ، فهو أن تبقى القناعات جامدة رغم اتساع المعرفة ونموّ الوعي. ــ ليو تولستوي

60👍12🔥8💯3👏2

10 May 2026, 16:04 UTC≈6,330 views44 reactionsread 30 August 2026

"الآباء والبنون- إيفان تورجنيف": - إن الضعفاء لا يقدرون على إنهاء شيء، بل ينتظرون نهايته."

💔23👍129

6 May 2026, 22:25 UTC≈6,400 views60 reactionsread 30 August 2026

حاول أن تحتفظ بالطفولة في روحك ما حييتَ، لأن الحقيقة كامنة فيها. مكسيم غوركي

46😘7🕊6❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ru_dn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,044,071 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فيودور دوستويفسكي
@Dostoyevsky_Kafka · 52,158
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
علم النفس : مقالات - أبحاث
@psychoanalysis_2021 · 40,161
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
مكتبة علم النفس
@Psychologybookss · 101,416
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
مكتبة المليار كتاب
@books2023 · 63,609
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
مكتبة روايات pdf 📚
@syriaaa22 · 136,569
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
كتب صوتية دينية - كتب صوتية اسلامية
@audiobooking2 · 40,527
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
كتاب صوتي - كتاب مسموع
@soundcloud_books · 44,975
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
اقرألي - كتب صوتية - كتب مسموعة
@iqraaly_books · 97,596
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
معلومات عامة،ثقافة، علوم،،تكنولوجيا، ابتكارات، اختراعات
@h_tuf · 94,078
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روائع الأدب الروسي” (@ru_dn), 26,225 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ru_dn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.