Channel
@Chekhov2021
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,694subscribers
-401 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001791281415 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chekhov2021 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chekhov2021 |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 21,694 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 21,701 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 21,709 | +5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 21,704 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 21,717 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 21,719 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 21,730 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 21,738 | +4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 21,734 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 21,742 | +4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 21,738 | -12 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 21,750 | -7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 21,757 | -26 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 20:39 | 21,783 | -46 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 21,829 | -59 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 21,888 | -20 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 21,908 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 21,925 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 21,939 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 21,944 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 January 2026 – 11 October 2026) |
| Views total | 139 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
662 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 459 | 69.3% | |
| 👍 | 69 | 10.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 3.93% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 3.63% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 3.47% | |
| 😐 | 20 | 3.02% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 1.36% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 1.06% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 1.06% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.755% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.755% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.604% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.604% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 662 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لكل باحث علمي، طالب ماجستير، ودكتوراه.. وداعاً لعناء البحث عن المراجع! 📍نقدم لك أفضل بوت كتب على التليجرام، والمربوط مباشرة بـ: 🔍بحث جوجل المتقدم 📍 مكتبة أرشيف الإنترنت الكبرى (Internet Archive) ✨المميزات: وصول فوري لأي كتاب أو مرجع تحتاجه في ثوانٍ. مكتبة رقمية متكاملة تلبي احتياجاتك البحثية والأكاديمية بالكامل. 🚀 وفّر وقتك وابدأ بحثك الآن: 👉 @TheArchiveLibBot @TheArchiveLibBot
كتب "تشيخوف" في مراسلة له مخاطبا زوجته بالقول: - وأنتِ لماذا مصابة بالاكتئاب؟ ما الذي أصابك بالاكتئاب؟فأنت تعيشين، وتعملين، وتفرحين وتشربين. وتضحكين عندما يقرأ عمُّك بصوت مرتفع لك، فأي شيء تريدين أكثر من ذلك؟ أما بالنسبة لي فالوضع مختلف: تمزِّقني مسألة الجذور، فأنا أعيش عيشة منقوصة، لا أشرب رغم أنني مُغرَم بالشراب، أعشق الضوْضاء لكنني لا أسمعها، حقيقة أنا مثل شجرة تم نقلها إلى مكان جديد، وتعاني التردد بين أن تضر…
❤19👍5🍓4⚡3💔2❤🔥1🔥1
تشيخوف: اعطوني زوجة مثل القمر ، لا تظهر في سمائي كل يوم جودت هوشيار كان أنطون تشيخوف في الحادية والأربعين من عمره عام 1901، عندما تزوج الممثلة المسرحية الشهيرة أولغا كنيبر. لم يكن تشيخوف متحمساً للزواج والحياة الزوجية؛ تردد طويلاً، وحاول أن يحتفظ بمساحته الخاصة، لكنه انتهى إلى الزواج من المرأة التي أحبها، وإن ظلت علاقتهما مختلفة عن صورة الزواج التقليدي. فلم تتح لهما حياة زوجية مشتركة بالمعنى المألوف. كان تشيخوف يع…
❤18👍3
أنطون تشيخوف... الرجل الذي لم يشأ أن يُذل أحداً جودت هوشيار تتردد في كتب الذكريات عن أنطون تشيخوف حكاية مؤثرة تعود إلى سنوات دراسته في المدرسة الثانوية. تقول الرواية إن الفتى مدّ يده يوماً لمصافحة أحد معلميه، لكن المعلم تجاهل اليد الممدودة وتركها معلقة في الهواء. كانت لحظة قصيرة، لكنها غرست في نفس تشيخوف شعوراً عميقاً بالمهانة والخذلان، وظلت راسخة في ذاكرته سنوات طويلة. وسواء أكانت هذه الحكاية قد رويت بتفاصيلها الد…
❤27👏4⚡1🔥1
تشيخوف في حضرة تولستوي جودت هوشيار لم يكن إعجاب أنطون تشيخوف بليف تولستوي مجرد تقدير لكاتب كبير، بل بلغ حدَّ التبجيل. فقد كان يرى فيه الضمير الأخلاقي للأدب الروسي، ويشعر في حضرته بمهابة لا يخفيها. أما تولستوي، فكان موقفه من أدب تشيخوف أكثر تعقيداً وتناقضاً؛ إذ جمع بين الإعجاب الصادق والانتقاد القاسي. فعندما تعجبه إحدى قصص تشيخوف، كان يقرأها مرات عدة، ثم يدعو أفراد أسرته وضيوفه إلى الاستماع إليها، ويثني على جمالها …
❤16😭5❤🔥2⚡1👍1🕊1
أنطون تشيخوف: حياة قصيرة... وإرث أدبي لا يموت جودت هوشيار في الخامس عشر من يوليو عام 1904، أسدل الستار على حياة أحد أعظم أدباء العالم، أنطون بافلوفيتش تشيخوف، الذي توفي في منتجع بادنفايلر الألماني، حيث كان يتلقى العلاج من مرض السل الذي أنهك جسده سنوات طويلة. وتروي زوجته، أولغا ليوناردوفنا كنيبر، تفاصيل ساعاته الأخيرة في مشهد أصبح من أكثر اللحظات الإنسانية تأثيرًا في تاريخ الأدب. فقد استيقظ تشيخوف في منتصف الليل، و…
❤18🔥10👍8🕊1
لعشاق الأدب الروسي - الأدب الإنساني والواقعي.. هذه مجموعة من القنوات.. أضغط على النص للدخول للقناة ⬇️ 🔵فيودور دوستويفسكي 🔵أنطون تشيخوف 🔵ليو تولستوي 🟣ارشيف روائع الأدب الروسي
👍7
"أنطون تشيخوف": - كل شيء يتوقف على الحظ.. وليس هناك أخلاق ولا منطق في أن تكون أنت مريضا بعقلك وأن أكون أنا دكتورا، ليس هناك إلا مجرد الحظ."
❤19😐8👍6⚡1
لا تخترع عناءات لم تتجشّمها بنفسك أنطون #تشيخوف
❤45⚡1
إن موطني الحقيقي هو ذلك القلب الذي يعرفني أكثر من أيّ شخص ، ويقبلني رغم كلّ شيء ، يحميني كما يجب ، ويعود إليّ وأعود إليه مهما حدث. ــ أنطـون تشيخوف
❤41❤🔥19⚡1
متواضع من هذا الزمان "نعم، كانت تلك السنوات الست التي عرفته فيها عذابًا، مليئةً بالألم والمعاناة بسبب مسار الحياة. ومع ذلك، كانت تلك السنوات زاخرة بالأحداث، ذات مغزى عميق، غنية، حتى أنها بدت لي جمال الحياة. في النهاية، لم أتزوجه كفتاة، ولم يكن بالنسبة لي مجرد رجل - لقد أذهلني كشخص استثنائي، بشخصيته الكاملة، بعالمه الداخلي - آه، يصعب عليّ وصف كل هذا... بقيت تلك السنوات الست المعذبة بالنسبة لي نورًا وحقيقةً وجمالًا لل…
❤23🕊4👍2⚡1❤🔥1
«أتعلمين، يا صوفيا، ما هو أكثر ما يُرعبني في هذه الحياة؟ ليس المرض، ولا الوحدة، ولا حتى الموت نفسه... بل فكرة أن يمرّ العمر كله دون أن أشعر للحظة واحدة أنني كنتُ حيًا حقًا. أن أستيقظ يومًا وأجد أنني لم أضحك من القلب، لم أحب بجنون، لم أصرخ من الألم، لم أبكِ بحرقة... أن يكون كل ما عشته مجرد سلسلة من الأيام المتشابهة، حيث لا شيء يُدهش، ولا شيء يُوجِع، ولا شيء يَبعث الحياة في العروق. أليس ذلك هو الموت الحقيقي؟». - اقتب…
❤58👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Chekhov2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أنطون تشيخوف” (@Chekhov2021), 21,694 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chekhov2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.