Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ryu일무이

Channel

Ryu일무이

@ryu1moo2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,129subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002448117309
TypeChannel
Username@ryu1moo2
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ryu1moo2

Growth

1,0921,1291,110.57 August 2026 — 1,092 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,092 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,093 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,112 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,115 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,115 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,125 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,129 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,086–1,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 18:361,129+4
2 Sept 2026, 11:441,125+9
30 Aug 2026, 07:361,116+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:121,115-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:171,116+1
21 Aug 2026, 04:041,115+3
18 Aug 2026, 08:331,112+14
15 Aug 2026, 05:071,098+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:031,097+4
8 Aug 2026, 05:271,093+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:051,092no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:291,092first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1588.2%
👍211.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC81 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @report_figure_by_offsetFile

File, posted without a caption

7 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC145 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @d_ticker

SK하이닉스, 3분기 배당 결정 - 주당 375원 - 배당률 0.02% - 1Q25부터 동일한 분기 배당금 - 배당률은 오히려 감소 추세 - 추가 주주환원 아님 https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260807800589

7 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @d_ticker

[공시] SK하이닉스, 청주 M17 시설투자 - 투자금액 19조 1000억 - 투자기간 26.08~31.04 - 수요 대응 위한 중장기 생산 기반 확보 https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260807800602

1

7 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC121 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @d_ticker

용인 2기 팹 투자도 발표했습니다 - 투자금액 35조 2246억 - 투자기간 26.08~2031.10

7 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC109 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ivy77788Photo

조용히 신고가 트라이 중인 'Buldak'

7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupinPhoto

골드만삭스, HBM 단가 폭등 및 프리미엄 재확대 (2027~2028년 전망) 2027년 HBM ASP는 전년 대비 약 2배 폭등. 차세대 HBM 고성능화 및 AI 시장의 본격적인 수급 불균형으로 인해 범용 DRAM과의 격차를 다시 $1.0/Gb 이상으로 크게 벌릴 것으로 전망

2

7 Aug 2026, 01:56 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @free_life59Photo

#메모리 #ms 1. 최근 메모리 주가의 가파른 조정을 사이클 종료가 아닌 노화 국면에서 발생하는 일시적 '작은 주름(Small Wrinkle)'으로 규정함. 2. 2026년 4분기 후기 사이클 진입에 따른 가격 상승세 둔화 우려보다 AI 인프라의 강력한 수요와 주주환원 확대 가능성에 주목함. 3. 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스 등 주요 공급사들이 장기공급계약(LTA)을 통해 실적 변동성을 낮추고 하방 지지력을 확보하고 있음을 확인됨. 4. 급격한 주가 하락으로 밸류에이션 매력이 높아진 현재를 전술적 재진입(Tactical Re-entry)의 적기로 판단함.

6 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC147 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @beluga_investmentPhoto

260807_SK Hynix: Reiterate Buy: Sustained Memory Upcycle + HBM Shortage + Shareholder Returns - CITI [Key Takeaways] (1) 현재 AI 메모리 업사이클은 아직 초기 단계. AI 수요가 DRAM, NAND 수요를 동시에 견인한다는 점에서, 이번 사이클은 '01년 ~ '07년 NAND 업사이클보다 더 강한 흐름을 보일 가능성이 있음 (2) 또한 지속되는 HBM 공급 부족으로 인해 AI 반도체 업체들은 개별 GPU의 HBM 탑재량을 높이는 스케일업 방식보다, HBM 탑재량이 상대적으로 적은 GPU를 더 많이 사용하는 스케일아웃 방식으로 전환하고 있음 (3) GPU당 HBM 탑재량은 감소하더라도, AI 시스템당 전체 HBM 용량은 +434% 증가 전망

6 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunstudy1234File

File, posted without a caption

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC192 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @beluga_investmentPhoto

Goldman Sachs: 메모리 산업 전망 전반적인 시장 전망(2027년 vs. 2026년): DRAM과 HBM 시장은 NAND보다 수급이 다소 더 타이트할 것으로 예상되며, 특히 2027년에는 세 시장 모두 2026년보다 공급 부족이 심화될 전망입니다. NAND 역시 2027년에는 2026년 대비 공급 부족 폭이 확대될 것으로 예상됩니다. 2027년 공급 부족(타이트니스) 정점: 세 메모리 시장 모두 2027년이 공급 부족의 정점으로 예상됩니다. DRAM: 2026년 -5.0% → 2027년 -5.9% (공급 부족 심화) HBM: 2026년 -5.4% → 2027년 -6.0% (공급 부족 심화) NAND: 2026년 -4.4% → 2027년 -4.6% (공급 부족 심화) 2025년 기준: 2025년에는 공급 부족이 상대적으로 제한적

5 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @GlobalTechMoon

[삼성 문준호의 반.전] 샌디스크 실적/가이던스 요약 ■ FY 4Q26 실적 - 매출액 89.65억 달러 : +372% y-y, +51% q-q : 컨센서스 84.40억 달러 상회 - Datacenter 매출액 29.77억 달러 : +1,298% y-y, +103% q-q : 컨센서스 26.28억 달러 상회 - Edge 매출액 54.32억 달러 : +392% y-y, +48% q-q : 컨센서스 45.48억 달러 상회 - Consumer 매출액 5.56억 달러 : -5% y-y, -32% q-q : 컨센서스 10.81억 달러 하회 - Non-GAAP 매출총이익률 84.6% : 컨센서스 80.0% 상회 - Non-GAAP 영업이익률 79.2% : 컨센서스 74.9% 상회 - Non-GAAP EPS 39.25 달러 : +13,434

5 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC160 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @JstockclassPhoto

글로벌 AI PCB 및 CCL 시장 전망 상향 (GS) 1. 글로벌 AI PCB 및 CCL TAM 대폭 상향 및 초고속 성장 • 글로벌 AI PCB TAM 추정치 26년 35%, 27년 38% 상향 조정 • 글로벌 AI CCL TAM 추정치 26년 20%, 27년 18% 상향 조정 • 2028년 글로벌 시장 규모: AI PCB 836억 달러, AI CCL 475억 달러 도달 전망 • 2026~2028년 연평균 성장률(CAGR): AI PCB +148%, AI CCL +161%의 폭발적 성장세 기록 2. 출하량 급증 및 스펙 상향에 따른 ASP 동반 상승 • AI PCB 출하량: 2026~2028년 연평균 85% 증가하여 2028년 450만 ㎡ 도달 • AI CCL 출하량: 2026~2028년 연평균 77% 증가하여 2028년 1

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ryu1moo2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ryu일무이” (@ryu1moo2), 1,129 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryu1moo2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.