Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сербские мемы

Channel

Сербские мемы

@serbianmemes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,379subscribers

+326 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001689087774
TypeChannel
Username@serbianmemes
DescriptionПереводим и объясняем сербские и балканские мемы. Мат не фильтруем, поэтому 18+ Дополнительный контент: Патреон patreon.com/SerbianMemes Бусти boosty.to/serbianmemes По вопросам рекламы и сотрудничества — @markofi По другим вопросам — @jobahoba
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/serbianmemes

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,0539,3799,2166 August 2026 — 9,053 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,068 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,088 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,097 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,093 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,089 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,092 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,097 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,106 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,099 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,125 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,143 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,151 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,198 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,238 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,262 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,273 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,280 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,284 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,299 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,348 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,372 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,379 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net +326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,004–9,428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 08:379,379+7
31 Oct 2026, 05:389,372+24
28 Oct 2026, 12:099,348+49
25 Oct 2026, 03:099,299+15
21 Oct 2026, 20:309,284+4
18 Oct 2026, 10:299,280+7
15 Oct 2026, 01:479,273+11
11 Oct 2026, 21:009,262+24
5 Oct 2026, 01:379,238+40
25 Sept 2026, 21:419,198+47
16 Sept 2026, 23:569,151+8
12 Sept 2026, 23:599,143+18
9 Sept 2026, 10:219,125+26
4 Sept 2026, 06:159,099-7
31 Aug 2026, 09:049,106+9
28 Aug 2026, 16:059,097+5
25 Aug 2026, 08:049,092+3
22 Aug 2026, 15:589,089-4
19 Aug 2026, 00:229,093-4
15 Aug 2026, 16:139,097first reading

Engagement

131 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 9,379 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 131 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held131 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total129,510
Reactions total6,545
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 21:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,410
Videos
≈830
Links
≈929

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 41s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

20,602 reactions across 124 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10,50451.0%
❤2,30611.2%
🤣1,5607.57%
💯1,1215.44%
😭9484.60%
🔥7503.64%
🥰6233.02%
💔5072.46%
😢2281.11%
😍1750.849%
🎃1700.825%
👍1530.743%
🎉1110.539%
🍾1040.505%
🫡1040.505%
🌚850.413%
✍840.408%
😱840.408%
❤‍🔥780.379%
🐳690.335%
37 further kinds8384.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 130 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @serbianmemes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 131 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.763%
1 of 131 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
511
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,930
over 129 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (26.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,830 views67 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

У коня раньше и сейчас

😁57🤣5🤔3❤2

5 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,200 views46 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

— Наки, мы идём на свадьбу моих друзей, постарайся не быть в центре внимания им в ущерб — Без проблем ... — Дорогие гости, сейчас придёт работник ЗАГСа 😢 — Нам пооохуууй

😁38💩3🥰2🥴2👏1

5 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,550 views191 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Когда вижу аресты в Сербии, вспоминаю, что я 1. однажды перебежала дорогу не по переходу 2. дала шоколадку тётке в госучреждении, чтобы получить желаемое 3. не вернула в библиотеку учебник за 8 класс

😁162❤15💯14

5 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,450 views84 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

— Я верил, что это персонаж мультфильма, гроза бандитов инспектор Радиша [так адаптировали в Югославии имя персонажа мультфильмов, инспектора Уиллоби — ред.], а оказалось, это... Тем временем: — Есть даже кадр, как он скачет на Драгане Справа — профессор Химического факультета Белградского университета Радомир Сайичич. СМИ называют его наиболее вероятным кандидатом на пост президента от Студенческого списка.

😁61🔥13❤6😭3👍1

5 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC≈3,540 views247 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Video

Мем жиза

😁136😭77💯15❤10🖕4💩3🤬1🤮1

5 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,740 views201 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Смерть в образе экс-главы Республики Сербской Милорада Додика ходит за политиками. Всех троих он действительно поддерживал перед роковыми для них выборами, а в США приехал буквально позавчера. В реплаях к его фото из США я этот мем и нашёл.

😁179❤14🔥8

4 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,400 views168 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @novostiserbiiPhoto

#СербыШутят про тот самый рейс Когда вышел из дома, но не уверен, а выключил ли утюг. Поддержите Новости Сербии — здесь про всё и даже больше

😁144❤10💯10⚡2🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC≈3,150 views182 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Блядь, они отмывали бабки даже на прогнозах погоды

😁159⚡10💯8❤5

4 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC≈3,260 views177 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Уважаемые зрители, делимся прогнозом арестов коррумпированных известных людей в Сербии. В Белграде ожидается град задержаний до 11; к западу волна коррупционных расследований до 5; на юге, в Нише и Вране — растущее давление заключения. В Приштине ситуация стабильная, но под наблюдением. Мем пророческий, после его выхода был задержан главный метеоролог Сербии Югослав Николич

😁143⚡23❤8👀1👍1🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 10:10 UTC≈3,060 views56 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ульяна показала офигенную игру, типа Вордли, но нужно угадать город на территории бывшей Югославии Балканах. Инджой: https://grad.dijov.com/ Ещё можно в лигу Русов вступить https://grad.dijov.com/?liga=CBLLXA

🔥49❤7

4 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC≈3,000 views131 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

— Почему пропущен и для чего зарезервирован номер +388? — Для "на хую тебя верчу". Делал про это пост, когда канал достиг гигантской для меня цифры в 300 подписчиков.

🤣92😁27❤8🔥3👀1

4 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,910 views86 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Пусть Джура заблокирует аэропорт Цитата из Балканского шпиона, очевидно относящаяся к скандальному развороту над Литвой

😁71👀7🕊5🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @serbianmemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @serbianmemes as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
43 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сербия — LIVE 🇷🇸 |⚡️Новости
@Serbia · 47,484
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Работа в Белграде/Сербия/
@rabotavbelgrade1 · 20,434
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
lalalanam
@lalalanam · 18,819
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 October 2026
Работа в Сербии | Rabota v Serbii
@rabotavserbii · 48,359
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
Вакансии в Сербии
@serbiawork · 19,618
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
Сербия - Новости
@serbnews · 21,362
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
Сербия - Новости (Сербии)
@serbia_news · 26,583
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Serbia In My Mind
@SerbiaInMyMind · 31,084
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
IT Работа: Сербия и удаленка LENKEP 🔥
@youritjob · 38,972
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
192.rs
@press192 · 26,729
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сербские мемы” (@serbianmemes), 9,379 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serbianmemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.