Полковник Исаев, вы обвиняетесь в том, что выдавая себя за штандартенфюрера Штирлица носили форму с запрещенной символикой https://t.me/rt_russian/297753

Channel
Усы Вилли Токарева
@usywilly
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,680subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001290114792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usywilly |
| Created | 11 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usywilly |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 10,680 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:18 | 10,683 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:40 | 10,687 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:51 | 10,693 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 10,695 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 10,700 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 10,696 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:38 | 10,698 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:11 | 10,703 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:11 | 10,701 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:55 | 10,705 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:25 | 10,710 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 10,711 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:15 | 10,721 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 10,728 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 10,731 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 10,732 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 10,735 | -2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 10,737 | +4 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 10,733 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.5%
- avg views ÷ 10,680 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,030
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (31 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 126,690 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 57s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (9.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Всех узнал. Жаль, что половина покойные.
Слабоумные запрещалкины после рейва в Ленинке:
Леонида Якубовича внесли в базу данных ГУР Минобороны Украины.
Кто тут спрашивал о причинах начала СВО? Вам тут баба Срака, завуч с фиолетовыми волосами, сейчас объяснит. Как она это умеет - визгливо вопя в лицо. Слюни летят, изо рта несёт говном, а она всё вопит - вот из-за таких как ты, Иванов, подонков в майках с иностранными надписями, нашу великую Родину вот-вот завоюет агрессивное НАТО!
А Виталий Бородин Скушал хуй (и не один)
Весьма удивился, обнаружив на старости лет, что Вася Васин, великий, трек "Капитализм" накатал под сильным влиянием Тупака Шакура, покойного. https://music.yandex.ru/album/14015077/track/21711212?utm_medium=copy_link&ref_id=5a79e4fd-ab8c-4fea-8f71-57942fd47b3c
Для важных переговоров
Ну где же Польша, Ну где же наша Польша, Давай поделим Польшу В который раз опять!
Знакомая история, где-то я её слышал
Кстати, в рейтинге Всероссийского Общества Тупых полоумных добирателей белка начали теснить Добиратели Клетчатки, что приближает нас к актуальным западным трендам.
Иишный перевод иногда умеет поставить в тупик...
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @usywilly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@comradepelevin · 19,9402 postsНеудаща
@dirtytatarstan · 51,1332 postsЭлитная Кухня
@elite_cuisine · 4592 postsИнженер-экстраверт 🤓💻
@fromittopr · 762 postsГомофобия и шаверма
@gomofobshaverma · 9372 postsZ ultra O sport V 🇷🇺
@ultraVsport · 2642 postsАтуттий Авантьевич
@Atuttii · 3291 postСЛАВА БОГУ У НАС ЕСТЬ МЕМЫ
@SBUNEM · 25,7361 postЦиолковский говорит 📱
@Tsiolkovskysay · 2371 postНЛО
@UFO_conspiracy_theorie · 21 postВЭД платежи в Азию и не только.
@VEDpathway · 6,7801 postЗначит, вы по правде нас не любите?
@WhatDontYouLoveUsAnymore · 8,3051 postСвидетель Сакрального Свинореза
@WitnessOfTheSacredSvinorez · 371 postТелега Бахура
@bahur_diary · 4601 postКапитан поменьше
@captainsmaller · 471 postДневник синего птица
@constanta_x · 171 postДорогая Хурма
@expensive_hurma · 151,2201 postТемы. Главное (ГлавМедиа)
@glavmedia · 76,1801 postИА "Стекломой"
@ia_steklomoy · 108,7441 postИвановские мюсли
@ivanovopinion · 141 postУлиткин на Склоне Лет
@jerusalmem · 31 postЛогика Кабана
@karocheeto · 5281 post🐝КаzZzарма🐝
@kazzzarrrma · 2161 postKuban__borschik
@kubanborschik · 16,8261 postПЛОВ ЦЕНТР
@lagmanbrat · 911 postНе женщина, а филолог
@lenochka_philology · 1461 postЛингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,3401 postРифмы, ритмы и вразброс
@mystore_cursive · 151 postНавуходоносор
@navuhod18 · 81 postOrtega Z 🇷🇺
@niemandswasser · 8,9191 postНаталья Макеева⚡️ Z
@nmakeevaZ · 6771 postЗарубки на мониторе
@nomoregain · 81 postНовичок
@novichokmedia · 391 postЛенинский прищур
@octoberserk · 311 postOtkuda_drovishki
@otkuda_drovishki_warehouse · 561 postPanama Channel
@panamach · 1411 postПепел Клааса
@pepelclaasa · 2,2161 postREDUX | Кирилл Орлов
@reduxx · 1,0821 postЛеонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,9581 postRaubritter
@sovietbear · 1631 postВрата Тангейзера
@tanhg8 · 4441 postДжейн он Эйр
@thejaneonair · 6,1971 postПутешествия для экономных Котиков от VeniVidi.ru
@travelerkotik · 2,4021 postZ (зет)
@vremya_z · 21 postPink socks
@you_mom_lover · 421 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@der_kultur_kampf · 11,1216 postsОвсяные Печенеги 🍪
@pecheneg_cookies · 22 postsКартавых Александр
@AlexCarrier · 145,3781 postискусственный интеллигент
@artifical_intelligent · 21 postЧерсанов
@chersanov · 81 postАлександр Пелевин Z
@comradepelevin · 19,9401 postДубровский
@Dybrovsky · 931 postЭлитная Кухня
@elite_cuisine · 4591 postПофестивалили и будет
@festformat · 1201 postЛогика Кабана
@karocheeto · 5281 postMoshkin | Z
@mmoshkin · 991 postШишкин лес live⚡️⚡️⚡️
@profshishkin · 7,3561 postРаньше всех. Ну почти что.
@rvsehnp · 8671 postТукай news
@tukay11 · 3591 postUltras Action
@ultras_action · 31,8651 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@mash · 3,144,7522 postsАбу
@abuwtf · 275,7431 postОльга Ускова | Cognitive Life
@cognitive_life · 119,1821 postРусский императив
@cybersotnik · 34,7541 postINSIDER UA | Україна | Новини
@insiderukr · 2,159,2001 postZ-PolitWera
@politwera · 19,7071 postТекстикулы
@Texticuless · 6,8481 postСегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,112,7761 postUltras Action
@ultras_action · 31,8651 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@usywilly named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ia_steklomoy · 108,744
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
@komissarischezaet · 30,972
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@istrkalkglk · 123,421
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
@sashakon · 132,832
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
@viveconesto · 53,408
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
@po_memes · 66,273
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
@my_yandex_wallet · 46,513
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Усы Вилли Токарева” (@usywilly), 10,680 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usywilly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.