Channel
@soccers_bad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,852subscribers
-675 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001697675536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soccers_bad |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soccers_bad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 28,852 | -52 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 28,904 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:05 | 28,927 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 28,947 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 28,971 | -28 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 28,999 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 29,020 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 29,038 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 29,062 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 29,084 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 29,104 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 29,123 | -24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 29,147 | -38 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 29,185 | -27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 29,212 | -23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 29,235 | -23 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 29,258 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 29,277 | -30 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 29,307 | -30 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 29,337 | first reading |
128 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 100 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 128 (5 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 42,699 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 33 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 51.9% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 13.0% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 10.4% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇰🇷سون هیونگ مین : من همیشه گفتم که برای خودم کریستیانو رونالدو بهترینه، چون الگوی منه؛ اما درباره لیونل مسی، احتمالاً باید بگم که اون بهترین بازیکن تاریخه. واقعاً نمیتونم با این حرف مخالفت کنم؛ احتمالاً مسی بهترین بازیکنیه که فوتبال به خودش دیده.
🫡1
🏴🇧🇷ریچارلیسون از لیست تاتنهام برای لیگ برتر خط خورد! هر تیم لیگ برتری باید فهرستی شامل حداکثر 25 بازیکن بزرگسال معرفی کنه و تاتنهام اسم ریچارلیسون رو تو این لیست قرار نداده؛ چون میخواد این مهاجم برزیلی تیم جدیدی برای خودش پیدا کنه. ترابزوناسپور ترکیه برای جذب ریچارلیسون پیشنهاد داده و پنجره نقلوانتقالات ترکیه هنوز بازه. اگه ریچارلیسون تا پایان این پنجره از تاتنهام جدا نشه، عملاً حدود 6 ماه نمیتونه برای تات…
🏴امیلیانو مارتینز : من کنار پیتر چک تمرین کردم؛ اون یکی از بهترین دروازهبان های تاریخ چلسیه و یه اسطورهست. امیدوارم که تو چلسی عملکرد خوبی داشته باشم. | Euro Foot
🇪🇸آنتونی گوردون خیلی زود تونسته دل رختکن بارسلونا رو به دست بیاره! با اینکه گوردون بهعنوان یکی از خریدهای بزرگ و گرونقیمت سالهای اخیر بارسا اومده، اصلاً از خودش نشون نداده. حتی میخواد زبان کاتالان یاد بگیره و خودش رو کاملاً با باشگاه و شهر بارسلونا وفق بده. فروتنی و رفتار حرفهایش هم باعث شده از همون روزهای اول، بازیکنها اونو یکی از خودشون بدونن. | Sport
📱استوری همسر کریس رونالدو که یه نکته بزرگ توش نهفتهست:
❤1
📱🇪🇸مارکوس یورنته با انتشار پستی تو صفحه رسمیش از تیم ملی اسپانیا خداحافظی کرد: بعد از مدتها فکر کردن تصمیم گرفتم از تیم ملی خداحافظی کنم. میدونم هنوز جوونم و شاید میتونستم چند سال دیگه هم با این پیراهن بازی کنم. شاید خیلیها تصمیمم رو درک نکنن، ولی این یه تصمیم کاملاً شخصیه که خیلی بهش فکر کردم و از ته دل گرفتم. چه به جام جهانی میرفتم چه نمیرفتم و چه قهرمان میشدیم چه نه، از قبل تصمیمم رو گرفته بودم. از همه کسای…
❤1
🇸🇦رسمی: گابریل مارتینلی با قراردادی 4 ساله به الهلال پیوست. 💸مبلغ انتقال : 70 میلیون یورو
🎙رفتن از بارسلونا به پاریسنژرمن رو یه قدم رو به جلو تو دوران حرفهایت میدونی؟ 🇫🇷فران تورس : بله. پاریسنژرمن قهرمان فعلی اروپاست و من به تیمی اومدم که الان قهرمان چمپیونزلیگه؛ پس قطعاً این انتقال یه قدم رو به جلوئه.
🔴شراب ناب فوتبال تو سن 41 سالگی جزو 3 هافبک برتر سریآ ایتالیا فصل 2025/26 انتخاب و تو تیم منتخب فصل قرار گرفت. 🇮🇹3 هافبک برتر سریآ : 🇮🇹 1. اسکات مکتومینای 🇮🇹 2. هاکان چالهاناوغلو 🇮🇹 3. لوکا مودریچ
🔴بعد از ادعای جنجالی «جرارد رومرو» که گفته بود کارواخال عامل اصلی نیومدن رودری به مادرید بوده؛ کارواخال هم یه جا بیکار ننشست و سریع زیر پست مربوط به این خبر کامنت گذاشت و نوشت : «دروغه🤥»
🇮🇹لائوتارو مارتینز: اینکه اسمم کنار بارسلونا مطرح شد باعث افتخارم بود، اما من میخوام همینجا بمونم. من عاشق این باشگاه، هواداراش و مردمش هستم و تا وقتی منو بخوان، همینجا میمونم.
🔴 اینم از وضعیت فعلی ورزشگاه آزادی که قراره تا آذرماه بازسازیش به پایان برسه و دوباره آماده میزبانی از مسابقات بشه!
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @soccers_bad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“soccers bad | ساکرز بد” (@soccers_bad), 28,852 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soccers_bad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.