Channel
@superbiceps
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,639subscribers
-357 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001062194860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @superbiceps |
| Description | 💯Помогаю тренироваться эффективно 🏆Оценка твоей формы и техники от Юрия! 🤝Контакт по рекламе, ведению, оценки техники, формы: https://t.me/Spasokukotskiy Оценка твоей формы в канале: @alexozavr Наш чат в телеграм https://t.me/+5eR4Zqzb5P4wNmEy |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/superbiceps |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:48 | 10,639 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:11 | 10,644 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:18 | 10,641 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 10,646 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 10,648 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 10,649 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 10,653 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 10,659 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 10,670 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 10,678 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:45 | 10,679 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:10 | 10,676 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:48 | 10,688 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 10,690 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 10,701 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 10,703 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 10,709 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:45 | 10,707 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 10,714 | +3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 10,711 | first reading |
116 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 116 (2 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 9,879 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
401 reactions across 83 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 152 | 37.9% | |
| ❤ | 98 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 13.2% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 4.99% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 4.49% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 3.49% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 2.49% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 1.50% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 1.25% | |
| 🥱 | 5 | 1.25% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.998% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.998% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.748% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.499% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.499% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.499% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.249% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.249% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.249% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5xJzKcv | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Девон Ларратт: сооснователь медицинского каннабиса и скандальные истории Spartan Wellness числила Девона соучредителем — компания помогала легально получать медицинский каннабис. В 2018-м MPX объявила о покупке Spartan за сумму до $6 млн. Сколько с этого досталось самому Ларратту — неизвестно. Спортсмен открыто говорил об употреблении психоактивных веществ. На соревнованиях, по его словам, не использовал, но, видим…
📊 Ленда Мюррей: не просто титулы, а история за каждым трофеем Пост от лица Ленды Мюррей — отличный пример того, как спортсменка показывает не только внешнюю сторону успеха, но и внутреннюю цену. Это и есть сильный личный бренд: ты не просто «чемпионка», ты человек, который честно говорит про напряжение, дисциплину и даже про облегчение после финиша. Ключевые смыслы, которые работают на имидж: «Готова к действию» —…
❤1👍1
Пробный. Сколько раз подниму 60 кг
🔥4👍2
Саша Спасокукоцкий рекорды на бицепс
❤1💊1
A 16-year-old guy lifts 50 kg in a strict biceps
❤1💊1
50 и 70 кг на бицепс. Саша Спасокукоцкий
🔥4🙊1
🔥 Вспомним Олимпию‑2019: год, когда трон пустовал ✨ 2019‑й многие называют периодом междуцарствия — и причины были весомые: ❌ Фил Хит не участвовал. ❌ Шону Родену отказали организаторы (из‑за уголовного дела). ❌ Кай Грин запросил слишком высокий гонорар. В итоге состав выглядел слабее обычного… но именно поэтому победа Брэндона Кёрри стала такой яркой. 🇺🇸 Он забрал титул и солидные $400 000. Особый хайлайт — прор…
❗️ Сарычев о тренировке со Смаевым: «Качали руки на площадке. Боролись за столом. Что могу сказать — это его праймовая версия! 160 кг. Нереальный просто. Руки ещё больше. Мы всё замерили, всё покажем в выпуске. 🔥 Я так скажу — это самый сильный НЕармрестлер, с которым я стоял за столом. Он меня реально удивил!
🔥8🌭1😁1
Как накачать грудные мышцы легкими гантелями
💯7🔥5❤2👍1
Пусть к становой 200 кг без травм и грыж
🔥6👍5
Редкие кадры 🎞 Дэннис Джеймс 💪💣 2003💥
🔥5
Владимир Яковлев: сотрудничество с Сергеем Даниловым прекращено 🤝
😱4🤷♂2🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @superbiceps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@superbiceps edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@superbiceps named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юрий Спасокукоцкий — фитнес, мышцы, питание” (@superbiceps), 10,639 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superbiceps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.