SyababSalafy—ditulis untuk dibaca berulangkali.
❤12👍4✍1

Channel
@syababsalafy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,909subscribers
-203 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001256620366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @syababsalafy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/syababsalafy |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 22,909 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 22,919 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 22,917 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 22,927 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 22,937 | -14 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 22,951 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 22,964 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 22,970 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:12 | 22,972 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 22,979 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 22,983 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 22,989 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 22,992 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 22,995 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 22,997 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 23,005 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 23,020 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 23,035 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 23,047 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 23,049 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,242 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 813 | 65.5% | |
| 👍 | 211 | 17.0% | |
| 👎 | 79 | 6.36% | |
| ✍ | 70 | 5.64% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @syababsalafy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20260321101214748515010300166899270968055 | 1 | 21 March 2026 | 21 March 2026 |
| 20260322101214238315010300166899271211924 | 1 | 22 March 2026 | 22 March 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 22 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
SyababSalafy—ditulis untuk dibaca berulangkali.
❤12👍4✍1
💎 Kebenaran itu sendiri sudah berat. Maka, janganlah kalian membuatnya semakin bertambah berat sebab buruknya akhlak kalian. 🛣️ Dahulu, aku mengira bahwa persoalan umat ini semata-mata terletak pada akidah. 🏚️ Namun kini, aku menyadari bahwa persoalan umat ini bukan hanya tentang akidah, tetapi juga tentang akhlak. 🎙️ Syaikh Muhammad Nashiruddin Al-Albani dalam Silsilah Al-Huda wa An-Nur: 900 ✉️ SyababSalafy http…
❤26✍3
💎 Menyadari bahwa kita memiliki anugerah kenikmatan ialah kenikmatan tersendiri. https://t.me/syababsalafy/1662
❤27👍15🔥8
💐 Duhai jiwa! Bila kamu belum mampu bersabar, maka teruslah mencoba, berupayalah! Ingatlah bahwa kita memang diciptakan dalam kondisi susah payah. 🌹 Keabadian di dalam Al-Firdaus tiadalah berbatas masa. Adapun petaka pada negeri fana hanyalah sementara. 🌼 Berhentilah berkeluh kesah pada manusia. Lalu, atas segala derita yang kamu rasa, ulang-ulanglah, “Ahad, Ahad, Allah Maha Esa!”. ✉️ SyababSalafy https://t.me/sya…
❤60✍11👍9
🎯 Masih ingat kitab ini? Bagi kaum santri, Kitab Al-’Ilm karya Syaikh Ibnu Utsaimin rahimahullah tentu sangat familiar. ⌛️ Di antara bab yang paling berkesan adalah pembahasan tentang hasad. Menariknya, inilah kesalahan pertama yang beliau peringatkan kepada penuntut ilmu. 🚀 Ada sekian banyak nasihat indah yang beliau berikan. Selain itu, beliau juga mengajarkan doa ini: اللَّهُمَّ زِدْهُ مِنْ فَضْلِكَ، وَأَعْطِنِ…
❤55👍7✍2🔥1
🖐️ Aku tiada pernah merasa iri kepada siapa pun perihal duniawi. ✍️ Karena, jika ia termasuk ahli surga, maka bagaimana mungkin aku iri kepadanya atas sesuatu dari dunia sementara ia sedang menuju surga? ⏳ Dan jika ia termasuk ahli neraka, maka bagaimana mungkin aku iri kepadanya atas sesuatu dari dunia sementara ia sedang menuju neraka? ▫️ Sesungguhnya, sifat iri adalah bagian dari akhlak orang-orang yang tercela…
❤33
✍️ Tidak elok ia yang enggan mencari penghidupan; padahal dengannya ia menjaga harga diri, sekaligus menuntaskan segala kewajiban. — Terjemah kontekstual dari ucapan Said Al-Musayyab ✉️ SyababSalafy https://t.me/syababsalafy/1656
❤33👍5✍4👎2
🍃 Selamat Idul Adha 1447 H! “Daging (hewan kurban) dan darahnya itu sekali-kali tidak akan sampai kepada Allah, tetapi yang sampai kepada-Nya ialah ketakwaan kamu.” (QS. Al-Hajj: 37) ✍️ Tafsir As-Sa’di: ✔️ Ayat ini mengandung hasungan untuk ikhlas kala menyembelih, tujuannya untuk Allah semata. ✔️ Bukan karena berbangga, ingin dilihat orang lain, didengar, atau menganggapnya sebagai adat kebiasaan saja. ✉️ Syaba…
❤27✍7🔥2👎1
📻 Mari saling mengingatkan tentang kebaikan ini. 🧭 Kita tidak tahu berapa banyak orang yang akan berpuasa sebab pesan yang kita bagikan, sehingga pahalanya pun akan mengalir untuk kita ke dalam timbangan amal kebaikan. 📝 Rasulullah ﷺ bersabda, “Tentang puasa di hari Arafah, aku berharap kepada Allah agar menghapuskan dosa setahun yang lalu dan setahun yang akan datang.” [HR. Muslim no. 1162]. ✔️ Asy-Syaikh Ibnu …
❤36✍5👎3
🍃 Adam ‘alaihissalam berprofesi sebagai petani, Nuh seorang tukang kayu, Idris adalah penjahit, sedangkan Ibrahim dan Luth keduanya bercocok tanam. 💎 Shalih berdagang, Dawud adalah tukang pandai besi, sedangkan Musa, Syu’aib, dan Nabi Muhammad shalawatullah ‘alaihim adalah penggembala. 📝 Disebutkan oleh Ibnu Abbas radhiyallahu anhuma dan ternukil dalam Mukhtashar Minhaj Al-Qashidin. #motivasi@syababsalafy ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ …
❤59👍9✍2
💎 Kala seorang membandingkan antara anugerah-Nya yang tiada tara dengan petaka yang ia rasa, sungguh derita itu tiada sebanding dengan berjuta nikmat-Nya. 📝 Bahkan, saat Allah mengujinya dengan musibah, lalu ia menghadapinya dengan kesabaran, rasa ridha, serta berserah diri … 🔑 Maka beban musibah itu akan terasa ringan dan penderitaannya pun akan berkurang. ✉️ Nasihat yang indah ini termaktub dalam Al-Wasail Al-Mu…
❤51✍5🔥1
💐 Doa merupakan salah satu jenis obat yang paling mujarab. Ia menjadi musuh bagi segala cobaan. Doa akan melindungi dari setiap bala, menyembuhkannya, dan mencegah kedatangannya. 🌷 Bahkan, doa dapat melenyapkan segala cobaan yang menimpa, ataupun meringankannya bila sedang melanda. Doa merupakan senjata bagi orang yang beriman. ✍️ Ibnul Qayyim rahimahullāh dalam Ad-Dā’ wa Ad-Dawā’, hal 11 #doa@syababsalafy ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖…
❤52👍6✍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @syababsalafy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🎁 Mau hadiah lebaran?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SyababSalafy️” (@syababsalafy), 22,909 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syababsalafy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.