Channel
@thewilkins
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,694subscribers
-744 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002245458819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thewilkins |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thewilkins |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 8,694 | -40 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 8,734 | -54 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 8,788 | -45 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 8,833 | -48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 8,881 | -38 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 8,919 | -69 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 8,988 | -54 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 9,042 | -74 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 9,116 | -71 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 9,187 | -98 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 9,285 | -69 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 9,354 | -46 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 9,400 | -38 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 9,438 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 9,438 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 29.1% | |
| 🏆 | 28 | 23.9% | |
| 🍓 | 20 | 17.1% | |
| 💘 | 18 | 15.4% | |
| ☃ | 13 | 11.1% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 2.56% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thewilkins. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
It was a pretty ordinary afternoon when Wilkins' Yujin asked Wilkins' Martin to go to the mall with her for some quality time together. They wandered around, chatting and checking out a few stores, until Wilkins' Yujin suddenly noticed the state of Wilkins' Martin shirt. "Astaga, dd, your baju is so compang-camping. Cece malu liatnya. Let’s buy a new jacket to cover that up!" Wilkins' Yujin said, already dragging hi…
🏆5🍓3❤1🎃1
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ High-school was full of little moments, loud laughs, and memories we somehow still bring up years later. Now, the 2000’s is back together again, we Greesacht’s Soobin, Letheris’ Soobin, Hefflins’ Soobin, Ferrovi’s Soobin, Scarvaine’s Chaewon, Liu’s Karina, Vansents’ Yoonseo, Vansents’ Yoshi, Mongolfier’s Chaewon, Mondcroft’s Karina, Schafer’s Giselle, Romanovna’s Giselle, Romanovna’s Lia, Wilkins’ Giselle, …
❤4🍓2💘2☃1🎃1🏆1
Kucing
kucing gembrot meow meow
Martin and Juhoon Wilkins try out the "Outfit Check" trend 🤪😎🤙
🏆3❤2💘2
Sundays are always the absolute best time for the 12 of us—Giselle Schäfer, Jongho Duisterg, Karina Arclaine, Giselle Wilkins, Jaemin Lachers, Chaewon Scarvaine, Soobin Scarvaine, Sunwoo Mills, Jihoon Reiss, Lia Romanovna, Chaeyoung Pedleton, and Ohyul Marelique—to finally slow down, catch up, and enjoy a much-needed nongki cantik session at the park. We spent the entire afternoon sitting on the grass, munching on …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Dilan nya Wilkins.
🏆11☃5💘5❤4🍓4
apakabar
❤8☃4🍓4💘4
New year new me #rambutbaru
❤7🍓3🏆2💘2☃1🎃1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Embarking upon a delightful voyage each 18th of this month, we unite with dear companions to honor their monthly milestone! In the eternal loom of existence, where seasoned bards and inquisitive wanderers intertwine the threads of our shared saga, the allure emanates from the intricate dance of character-driven quests and the bonds woven with kindred spirits, epitomized by @TheEdurne @Schouvert @Loudrios @HouseOfLut…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @thewilkins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 55 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@thewilkins named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Wilkins: House Of Divergence.” (@thewilkins), 8,694 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thewilkins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.