Channel
@ulama
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,070subscribers
-124 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001000627591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ulama |
| Created | 19 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ulama |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ibn_baz_ru/21427 Jun 2026, 19:21 UTC | @ulama/7662 · this entry27 Jun 2026, 19:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ibn_baz_ru/2153 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC | @ulama/7664 · this entry3 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ibn_baz_ru/21628 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC | @ulama/7672 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ibn_baz_ru/2187 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC | @ulama/7675 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fawzan_ru/121524 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC | @ulama/7661 · this entry24 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fawzan_ru/121713 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC | @ulama/7667 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ibn_baz_ru | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ibn_baz_ru (6–0) |
| @fawzan_ru | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @fawzan_ru (5–0) |
| @ulama_ramadan | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 17 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @adab_salaf. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 14,070 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 14,071 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 14,072 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 14,077 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 14,082 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 14,086 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 14,091 | -4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 14,095 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 14,094 | -3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 14,097 | -4 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 20:19 | 14,101 | -9 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 14,110 | -11 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 14,121 | +1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 14,120 | +4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 14,116 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 14,114 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 14,117 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 14,127 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 14,131 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 14,140 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,307 reactions across 29 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 918 | 70.2% | |
| 👍 | 354 | 27.1% | |
| 💔 | 33 | 2.52% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Молитва и милостыня (садакъа) относятся к важнейшим средствам для (1) отведения наказания (Аллаха), (2) прощения грехов (3) и удвоения благих дел». ابن باز: الصلاة والصدقة من أعظم الأسباب في دفع العقوبات وتكفير السيئات ومضاعفة الحسنات 📚 См. «аль-Маджму’» 3/257 © t.me/ibn_baz © t.me/ulama
❤42👍9
✅ Выход газов во время чтения Корана • Аль-Аджурри (360 г.х.) сказал: «Если во время чтения [без прикосновения к Корану] у читающего выходят газы, ему следует прекратить чтение, пока их выход не прекратится. Затем, если он пожелает совершить омовение и продолжить чтение в состоянии очищения, то это лучше. Если же он будет читать без омовения, то в этом нет ничего предосудительного». • Шейх ‘Абдур-Раззакъ аль-Бадр (…
👍16❤10
Саляфы не знали маулид https://t.me/imaams/1447
❤9👍2
📹 Почему нет «маулида» в Медине | шейх ‘Абдур-Раззакъ аль-Бадр 📺 Ссылка: https://youtube.com/shorts/zanfvZw7CEI © t.me/albadr_ru © t.me/ulama
❤22👍4
📹 Некоторые фетвы ученых о маулиде [1] «Мы любим пророка, но он не узаконил маулид!» (эмоционально) (шейх Ибн Баз) t.me/ibn_baz_ru/180 📤 Ссылка: https://youtu.be/BZbrter-qq0 [2] Дискуссия о маулиде (шейх аль-Альбани) t.me/albani_ru/80 📤 Ссылка: https://youtu.be/ty4VDhgyhKw [3] Происхождение маулида (шейх аль-‘Аббад) t.me/abbad_ru/90 📤 Ссылка: http://youtu.be/GhVHTy12K8E [4] Появление маулида и его положение в Исл…
❤13👍4
✅ Призыв во время чуждости ислама • Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Приверженцы истины должны во времена чуждости ислама увеличивать свое усердие в разъяснении законоположений ислама, в призыве к нему, в распространении благородных качеств и в борьбе с порочными поступками. Они должны быть стойкими на этом пути, до тех пор, пока не окажутся из числа праведников среди грешных людей и пока не окажутся среди тех…
❤21👍10👎2
✅ Мирская жизнь — ничто • Шейх аль-‘Усаймин (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Вся эта жизнь — преходящее благо, а все имеющиеся в ней удовольствия и радости окружены печалями и невзгодами. Нет в этом мире такой радости, за которой не последовали бы горе и печаль. Кажется, Ибн Мас‘уд (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: “Не наполнится дом радостью, чтобы затем он не наполнился печалью и горем”. И он сказал правду, да будет до…
❤41👍17💔4
• Шейх аль-Альбани (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Какой бы непрестижной ни была профессия, для мусульманина она достойнее и лучше, чем безделье и необходимость просить у людей, дадут они ему или откажут». الألباني: الحرفة مهما تدنت فهي أشرف للمسلم وخير له من البطالة ومن أن يتكفف أيدي الناس أعطوه أو منعوه 📚 См. «Тамам аль-минна» 370 © t.me/albani_ru © t.me/ulama
❤58👍25
✅ Откладывание намаза • Шейх ‘Абдуллах ибн Джибрин (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Не дозволено откладывать намаз по причине работы, учебы или чего-либо другого настолько, что его время полностью выйдет. Если, например, есть опасение, что наступит время послеполуденного намаза (‘аср), а человек ещё не совершил полуденный (зухр), или что солнце зайдёт, а он ещё не совершил послеполуденный намаз, то необходимо прекратить ра…
❤41👍5
• Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Нет пути к счастью, величию, достоинству и спасению в этом и вечном мире кроме как посредством приверженности шариату, следования его постановлениям, остережения того, что противоречит ему, а также посредством призыва к нему и терпения на этом пути». ابن باز: ولا سبيل إلى السعادة والعزة والكرامة والنجاة في الدنيا والآخرة إلا بالتمسك بالشريعة والتقيد بأحكامها، والحذر مما خالفها…
❤49👍19
• Шейх аль-‘Усаймин (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Ложь не дозволена ни всерьез, ни в шутку, поскольку это относится к порицаемым качествам, которыми отличаются лишь лицемеры!» العثيمين: الكذب لا يجوز مازحاً ولا جاداً لأنه من الأخلاق الذميمة التي لا يتصف بها إلا أهل النفاق 🔊 Сл. «Нурун ‘аля-ддарб» 17 © t.me/usaymin_ru © t.me/ulama
👍30❤13💔2
✅ Стричь ногти ночью • Вопрос: «Запрещено ли стричь ногти ночью или нет?» • Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله): «Стричь ногти ночью или днем дозволено, это предписано без каких-либо ограничений, будь это ночью или днем». السؤال: هل قص الأظافر بالليل حرام أم لا؟ الجواب: قص الأظافر بالليل، أو بالنهار جائز، في الليل، والنهار مطلقًا، مشروع 🔉 Сл. «Фатауа аль-Джами’ аль-кабир» (binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/1452/حكم) © t.me/ibn_baz ©…
❤19👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @ulama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ulama edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ученые Сунны ©” (@ulama), 14,070 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ulama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.