Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нравы Саляфов ©

Channel

Нравы Саляфов ©

@adab_salaf

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,405subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005081281
TypeChannel
Username@adab_salaf
Created9 December 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/adab_salaf

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@adab_salaf/2459 · this entry28 May 2026, 05:12 UTC@ulama_ramadan/92028 May 2026, 05:25 UTC1.0014 minutes
@ulama_ramadan/92716 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC@adab_salaf/2463 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@adab_salaf/2464 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC@ulama_ramadan/93022 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@ulama_ramadan/93423 Jun 2026, 14:31 UTC@adab_salaf/2472 · this entry25 Jun 2026, 07:32 UTC1.0041 hours
@adab_salaf/2466 · this entry23 Jun 2026, 05:35 UTC@ulama_ramadan/93624 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC1.0028 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ulama_ramadan7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutesthis entry (52)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @adab_salaf — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,38210,43910,410.55 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,429 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,427 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,433 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,432 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,430 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,439 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,435 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,423 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,419 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,416 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,411 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,412 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,405 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,396 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,392 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,390 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,392 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,386 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,384 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,382 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,384 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,387 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,403 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,410 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,401 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,398 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,395 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,401 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,405 subscribers10,4055 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,373–10,448 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:1710,405+4
15 Sept 2026, 17:3710,401+6
14 Sept 2026, 02:1810,395-3
12 Sept 2026, 09:4010,398-3
10 Sept 2026, 03:3610,401-9
7 Sept 2026, 00:0210,410+7
4 Sept 2026, 10:1910,403+16
2 Sept 2026, 22:5910,387+3
1 Sept 2026, 21:0510,384+2
31 Aug 2026, 19:0710,382-2
30 Aug 2026, 20:2510,384-2
29 Aug 2026, 22:1610,386-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:1410,389-3
26 Aug 2026, 22:2310,392+2
26 Aug 2026, 00:1810,390-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:1510,392-4
23 Aug 2026, 11:5810,396-9
21 Aug 2026, 23:5710,405-7
20 Aug 2026, 18:4510,412+1
19 Aug 2026, 17:0310,411first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 29 August 2026

✅ Совет ‘Умара о дружбе • ‘Умар ибн аль-Хаттаб (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Не берись за то, что тебя не касается. Сторонись своего врага и остерегайся своего друга из числа людей, кроме надёжного. А надёжным является лишь тот, кто боится Всевышнего Аллаха. Не водись с нечестивцем, иначе научишься у него нечестию, и не посвящай его в свою тайну. А в своих делах советуйся с теми, кто боится Аллаха». قَالَ عُ

20 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 29 August 2026

• Абу Уакъид аль-Лейси (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Мы рассматривали деяния в этом мире и не нашли ничего более действенного для деяний последней жизни (ахира), чем отречение от мирского (дунья)». عَنْ أَبِي وَاقِدٍ اللَّيْثِيِّ قَالَ: تَابَعْنَا الْأَعْمَالَ فِي الدُّنْيَا، فَلَمْ نَجِدْ شَيْئًا أَبْلَغَ فِي عَمَلِ الْآخِرَةِ مِنَ الزُّهْدِ فِي الدُّنْيَا 📚 Уаки’ в «аз-Зухд» (3) © t.me/adab_salaf

18 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,650 viewsread 29 August 2026

✅ Когда Аллах желает блага человеку… • Мухаммад ибн Ка’б аль-Къуразы (табиин) сказал: «Если Аллах желает [Своему] рабу блага, Он (1) делает его равнодушным к мирской жизни, (2) дарует ему понимание религии (3) и даёт ему увидеть собственные недостатки. А кому дарованы эти три качества, тому даровано благо этого мира и последней жизни». عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ كَعْبٍ الْقُرَظِيِّ، قَالَ: إِذَا أَرَادَ اللَّهُ بِعَبْدٍ خ

18 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈2,170 viewsread 29 August 2026

Продолжение публикаций иншаАллах

3 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈4,220 viewsread 29 August 2026

• Ахмад ибн ‘Асым аль-Антакъи сказал: «Если хочешь исправить своё сердце, то помогай себе в этом, оберегая свой язык». أَحْمَدُ بْنُ عَاصِمٍ الْأَنْطَاكِيُّ: إِذَا أَرَدْتَ صَلَاحَ قَلْبِكَ فَاسْتَعِنْ عَلَيْهِ بِحِفْظِ لِسَانِكَ. 📚 См. «аль-Бидая уа-ннихая» (14/358) © t.me/adab_salaf

2 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 29 August 2026

✅ Необходимость поминать Аллаха в собраниях • Сообщается от Абу Хурайры (да будет доволен им Аллах), что Пророк (ﷺ) сказал: «Какие бы люди ни собрались в каком-либо собрании, не поминая в нём Аллаха и не призывая благословения на своего пророка, это непременно станет для них причиной сожаления. Если Аллах пожелает, Он подвергнет их наказанию, а если пожелает — простит их».[*] مَا جَلَسَ قَوْمٌ مَجْلِسًا لَمْ يَذْكُ

26 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC≈4,110 viewsread 29 August 2026

• ’Умар ибн аль-Хаттаб (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Если Аллах даровал тебе любовь какого-либо мусульманина, то держись за него настолько, насколько сможешь». قَالَ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ: إِذَا رَزَقَكَ اللَّهُ وُدَّ امْرِئٍ مُسْلِمٍ فَتَشَبَّثْ بِهِ مَا اسْتَطَعْتَ 📚 Уаки’ в «аз-Зухд» (334) © t.me/adab_salaf

13 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC≈5,080 viewsread 29 August 2026

• Ибн ‘Умар (да будет доволен им Аллах) сказал: «Благочестие — это нечто лёгкое: приветливое лицо и мягкая речь». قَالَ ابْنُ عُمَرَ : الْبِرُّ شَيْءٌ هَيِّنٌ: وَجْهٌ طَلِيقٌ وَكَلَامٌ لَيِّنٌ 📚 Ибн Аби ад-Дунья в «ас-Самт» (316) © t.me/adab_salaf

7 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC≈6,970 viewsread 29 August 2026

✅ Опасность разговора о религии без знания • Абу Бакр ас-Сыддикъ (да будет доволен им Аллах) говорил: «Какое небо укроет меня и какая земля понесёт меня если я скажу о Книге Аллаха то, чего не знаю?!» كَانَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ يَقُولُ: أَيُّ سَمَاءٍ تُظِلُّنِي وَأَيُّ أَرْضٍ تُقِلُّنِي إِذَا قُلْتُ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ مَا لَا أَعْلَمُ 📚 Малик (2079), Ибн Аби Шейба (32100), «Тафсир ат-Табари» (1/72) © t.me/tafsir_salaf ©

29 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTC≈5,590 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @aqida_salaf

• ‘Умар ибн ‘Абдуль-‘Азиз (табиин) сказал: «Кто сделал свою религию предметом споров, тот станет часто переходить (из одного убеждения в другое)». عُمَرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ: مَنْ جَعَلَ دِينَهُ غَرَضًا لِلْخُصُومَاتِ أَكْثَرَ التَّنَقُّلَ 📚 ад-Дарими (312) © t.me/aqida_salaf

28 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTC≈5,210 viewsread 29 August 2026

• Посланник Аллаха (ﷺ) сказал: «Поистине, самым ненавистным из людей для Аллаха является заядлый спорщик». إِنَّ أَبْغَضَ الرِّجَالِ إِلَى اللَّهِ الأَلَدُّ الْخَصِمُ 📚 аль-Бухари (2457), Муслим (2667) © t.me/adab_salaf

25 Jun 2026, 07:32 UTC≈5,180 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @fikh_salaf

✅ Сподвижники пророка и пост в день ‘Ашура [1] Са’ид ибн аль-Мусайиб говорил: «Пророк (ﷺ), Абу Бакр и ‘Умар (да будет доволен ими Аллах) повелевали (побуждали) поститься в день ‘Ашура». عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيِّبِ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ وَأَبَا بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ أَمَرُوا بِصَوْمِ عَاشُورَاءَ 📚 ат-Табари в «Тахзибуль-асар» (муснад ‘Умар) 667 [2] Абу Бакр ибн ‘Абдур-Рахман ибн аль-Харис сказал: «В ночь перед днём ‘Ашу

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @adab_salaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Исламские книги PDF
@kniga_pdf · 112,662
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нравы Саляфов ©” (@adab_salaf), 10,405 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adab_salaf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.