✅ منابع مطالعاتی ارشد حسابداری ۱۴۰۶

Channel
حسابداران برتر
@umzacc313
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,588subscribers
-307 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001142852049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @umzacc313 |
| Description | 📥 یکی از بروزترین مجموعه های آموزشی در زمینه حسابداری ✅ لیست کانال های زیرمجموعه : https://t.me/joinchat/TtNAxPDHVps5ZWFk 💸 تعرفه تبلیغات : https://t.me/+UTZDoGytZTxOuV2I |
| Created | Between 1 March 2016 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/umzacc313 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:01 | 19,588 | +3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 19,585 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 19,598 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 19,609 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 19,610 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 19,614 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:51 | 19,616 | +4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:00 | 19,612 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 19,617 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 19,626 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 19,640 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 19,643 | +5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:35 | 19,638 | +11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 19,627 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 19,631 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 19,636 | +5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 19,631 | -9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:47 | 19,640 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 19,641 | -7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 19,648 | first reading |
Engagement
149 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.49%
- avg views ÷ 19,588 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 684
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.24%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 149 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 149 (2 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,360 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,790
- Videos
- ≈282
- Links
- ≈1,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 40s
- Average length
- 1m 33s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
239 reactions across 39 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 33.1% | |
| 👏 | 42 | 17.6% | |
| 😡 | 34 | 14.2% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 9.21% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 7.95% | |
| 😐 | 15 | 6.28% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 2.93% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
▪️آزمون حسابدار رسمی : https://t.me/+BKDIzG4rIeIyYmQ0 https://t.me/+BKDIzG4rIeIyYmQ0
🌹فایل راهنمای شرکت در آزمون انتخاب حسابدار رسمی سال ۱۴۰۵ ✅ زمان ثبت نام : از تاریخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۰ تا ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۶ 💵 هزینه ثبت نام : ۲،۰۰۰،۰۰۰ تومان 📥 زمان برگزاری آزمون : روز پنجشنبه ۲۴ دی ۱۴۰۵ ✍️ لینک ثبت نام در سایت سنجش 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙 🌹مطالب بروز حسابداری را فقط از کانال #حسابداران_برتر پیگیری کنید. 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙
♦️ثبتنام آزمون انتخاب حسابدار رسمی سال ۱۴۰۵ آغاز شد. 🔹 ثبتنام متقاضیان شرکت در آزمون انتخاب حسابدار رسمی ، از امروز یکشنبه ؛ ۱۰ آبانماه ۱۴۰۵ از طریق تارنمای سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور آغاز شده است. 🔹داوطلبان تا روز شنبه ۱۶ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵ فرصت دارند با مراجعه به تارنمای سازمان سنجش به نشانی www.sanjesh.org نسبت به ثبتنام اقدام کنند. 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙 🌹مطالب بروز حسابداری را فقط از کانال #حسابداران_برتر پیگیری کنید. 🇮🇷…
⚡2
▪️مشاوره حسابداری : https://t.me/+xQ6Xpsru7cQwZmZk https://t.me/+xQ6Xpsru7cQwZmZk
🌹دانلود حل تشریحی مسائل صورتهای مالی تلفیقی تاری وردی (به روز شده) 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙 ________________________________ حل مسائل فصل ۱ صورتهای مالی تاری وردی ________________________________ حل مسائل فصل ۲ صورتهای مالی تاری وردی ________________________________ حل مسائل فصل ۳ صورتهای مالی تاری وردی ________________________________ حل مسائل فصل ۴ صورتهای مالی تاری وردی ________________________________ حل مسائل فصل ۵ صورته…
برای اولین بار در ایران 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙 دانلود حل تشریحی مسائل صورتهای مالی تلفیقی تاری وردی (چاپ جدید) - حسابداران برتر 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙
✅ کارنامه رتبه 2 ارشد حسابداری سال 1405 💥تبریک ویژه بابت کسب رتبه تک رقمی 🌸 روزانه #دانشگاه_تهران (مالی) 👈 کانال ما در تلگرام و ایتا 🖥 سایت رهاسل : 🇮🇷 www.rahasell.ir
📣 مهلت ثبت نام آزمون دکتری تمدید شد. ❇️ معاون آزمون های سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور از تمدید مهلت ثبتنام و اصلاحات مربوط به دفترچه راهنمای آزمون مقطع دکتری نیمهمتمرکز سال ۱۴۰۶ در تمام دانشگاه ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی و دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تا روز جمعه ۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵ خبر داد. 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙 🌹مطالب بروز حسابداری را فقط از کانال #حسابداران_برتر پیگیری کنید. 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙
❤2
▪️نکته و تست حسابداری : https://t.me/+aZE6x7fFnc0yOTlk https://t.me/+aZE6x7fFnc0yOTlk
✅ درخواست های خودتان را فقط در بستر #تلگرام برای ما ارسال کنید : 1- حل تشریحی کتب حسابداری 2- حل تشریحی سوالات ارشد حسابداری 3- حل تشریحی سوالات دکتری حسابداری 4- حل تشریحی سوالات حسابدار رسمی 5- فایل پیش بینی ارشد حسابداری 6- کتاب های لقمه طلایی (منابع ارشد) 7- جزوات درسی ویژه ترم دانشگاه 8- آموزش نکته و تست حسابداری 9- کارنامه های ارشد و دکتری حسابداری 10- کارنامه های دستگاه اجرایی و بانک 11- کارنامه های…
🌹دانلود حل تشریحی تمارین حسابداری مدیریت پرویز بختیاری (ویرایش جدید) 🇮🇷 @umzacc313 🔙 ________________________________ حل تمارین فصل ۱ حسابداری مدیریت ________________________________ حل تمارین فصل ۲ حسابداری مدیریت ________________________________ حل تمارین فصل ۳ حسابداری مدیریت ________________________________ حل تمارین فصل ۴ حسابداری مدیریت ________________________________ حل تمارین فصل ۵ حسابداری مدیریت __________…
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @umzacc313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@umzacc313 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 15 posts on @umzacc313 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 29 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 30 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌹برای دریافت اعلام نتایج اولیه کنکور ارشد آماده اید؟ @umzacc313
- بله - چون آزمون را خوب داده بودم.47%
- خیر - چون خیلی خرابش کرده بودم.20%
- خیر - آزمایشی شرکت کرده بودم.33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@HESABSTAR · 30,194#1
@hsab_Dari_11 · 16,605#2
@Hesabdar_speed · 19,422#3
@Accounting_House · 68,843#4
@hesabdarimomtaz · 62,715#5
@noandishanhesabdari · 105,717#6
@accountingtestt · 17,549#7
@accountingprofessionals · 10,999#8
@Iranian_accountants · 16,932#9
@modiriat_hesabdari95 · 51,487#10
@fileaccunting · 73,880#11
@amir_t3t · 30,026#12
@accounting_hakim · 4,907#13
@PNUelektroniki · 1,516#14
@hesabdari021 · 8,130#15
@taxkalej · 23,434#16
@vazinargham · 63,958#17
@hesabdarijozveh · 54,730#18
@noboghbartar98 · 23,926#19
@hesabdari_malimaliati · 16,497#20
@jamshideskandariii · 22,870#21
@hesabdar_learn · 11,875#22
@accountants_of_iran · 18,600#23
@hesabdari_book · 4,324#24
@accexam · 12,985#25
@Accountingvideos · 8,472#26
@IranAccPlus · 42,506#27
@ALL0715 · 15,432#28
@Learnaccounting · 2,686#29
@MoshaverMaliyat · 4,000#30
@HesAmaliyatii · 1,262#31
@academy_accounting · 11,303#32
@smbagherabadi_smb · 12,144#33
@Accountantkhuisf · 4,287#34
@khorasgan_accountant · 2,436#35
@tejaratestekhdam · 30,193#36
@Naha_ir · 1,161#37
@acc_aducation · 5,667#38
@iica_ir · 15,701#39
@hesabdar_mmlekat · 344 (as read 30 September 2026)#40
@estekhdamacc · 22,467#41
@uni_news2 · 10,907#42
@akhbaremodiriat · 2,003#43
@usc_hesabdarii1401 · 554#44
@Hesabdari_Co · 1,016#45
@hesabdarycom · 24,166#46
@accounting_professional · 8,615#47
@ConservatoryConcours · 6,440#48
@Negareh_ac · 5,232#49
@the_banker1 · 20,077#50
@sohbati_accounting · 458 (as read 30 September 2026)#51
@shamsihesab · 933#52
@math_99_00_1 · 679#53
@Ketab_raigan_Jozveh · 4,891#54
@hesabdari_sp12 · 684#55
@Accounting_Isf · 3,727#56
@Banki_Sho · 20,811#57
@accexamp · 16,816#58
@accounting_Qomuni · 446#59
@kiauAccounting · 3,786#60
@irhesabdaran · 19,547#61
@danesh_tax · 10,435#62
@Book_Hoghogh · 18,334#63
@my_tax_govir · 3,001#64
@MrTax_podcast · 22,529#65
@hesabdari_test · 11,128#66
@theories_management · 52,222#67
@nadernoroozi · 8,663#68
@hesabdarikarbord · 1,968#69
@accounting_omid · 7,437#70
@accounting_free · 11,060#71
@accounting_mz · 11,824#72
@AccPluss · 849#73
@taxpress · 58,031#74
@jozve_bezar · 11,439#75
@Persian_Coinx · 388 (as read 30 September 2026)#76
@Theori_Modiriat · 18,972#77
@Shamsi_OstadBank · 2,478#78
@Excel_Salam · 6,160#79
@VBA_Excel · 102,783#80
@ut_farabi · 3,938#81
@tesathesabdarimomtaz · 14,631#82
@beheshti_modiriat · 364#83
@PDFOCRNOR · 5,657#84
@treenvest8 · 235 (as read 30 September 2026)#85
@BeheshtiHunt · 421 (as read 30 September 2026)#86
@farabi_ut · 2,072#87
@behrooz_razavi_auditor · 1,408#88
@azmooniha1 · 84,980#89
@Kamran0067 · 1,326#90
@PetroBrief · 426#91
@siah_sefid_viros · 979#92
@Farankfx · 2,702#93
@Liverpoolvideos · 3,067#94
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@HESABSTAR · 30,194
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@fileaccunting · 73,880
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@irhesabdaran · 19,547
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 October 2026
@jamshideskandariii · 22,870
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
@modiriat_hesabdari95 · 51,487
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@hesabdarijozveh · 54,730
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
@hesabdarimomtaz · 62,715
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
@vazinargham · 63,958
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@noandishanhesabdari · 105,717
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@Accounting_House · 68,843
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
@estekhdamacc · 22,467
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@amir_t3t · 30,026
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@noboghbartar98 · 23,926
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
@Hesabdar_speed · 19,422
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 October 2026
@hesabdarycom · 24,166
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
@omomi_ettelaat · 29,535
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@taxkalej · 23,434
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
@MrTax_podcast · 22,529
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
@tejaratestekhdam · 30,193
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@IranAccPlus · 42,506
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حسابداران برتر” (@umzacc313), 19,588 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umzacc313.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.