Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 90 days, net +365. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,322–18,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 14:26
17,983
-17
4 Nov 2026, 15:50
18,000
-3
3 Nov 2026, 16:09
18,003
-10
2 Nov 2026, 14:26
18,013
-5
1 Nov 2026, 14:19
18,018
-6
31 Oct 2026, 16:48
18,024
-2
30 Oct 2026, 17:50
18,026
+1
29 Oct 2026, 20:28
18,025
-8
28 Oct 2026, 21:00
18,033
-9
27 Oct 2026, 22:48
18,042
+29
26 Oct 2026, 19:17
18,013
+50
25 Oct 2026, 22:39
17,963
-3
25 Oct 2026, 00:05
17,966
-10
24 Oct 2026, 01:38
17,976
-13
22 Oct 2026, 22:59
17,989
-11
21 Oct 2026, 20:51
18,000
-3
20 Oct 2026, 16:39
18,003
+3
19 Oct 2026, 13:28
18,000
-15
18 Oct 2026, 16:15
18,015
+5
17 Oct 2026, 17:58
18,010
first reading
Engagement
110 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 17,983 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,390
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 110 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
110 (31 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
71,210
Reactions total
6,436
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 15:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,510
Videos
≈1,180
Links
≈93
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
26m 17s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33,169 reactions across 109 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
10,169
30.7%
🤣
6,771
20.4%
❤
4,821
14.5%
🔥
4,738
14.3%
💯
2,298
6.93%
👍
1,523
4.59%
❤🔥
718
2.16%
😨
405
1.22%
😢
237
0.715%
😍
146
0.44%
👏
135
0.407%
💔
126
0.38%
🤝
119
0.359%
🎉
113
0.341%
🥰
97
0.292%
✍
85
0.256%
🤪
74
0.223%
👀
73
0.22%
🤗
72
0.217%
😱
67
0.202%
32 further kinds
382
1.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 109 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @viketz_off. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 110 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.82%
2 of 110 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,260
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,450
over 107 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFKAHm7f
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqUqfuc6hDMCeTb4tLSYtcRnNaZuhFhJTUMTL5
1
16 August 2026
16 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Работать в команде с молодёжью прекрасно.
Здоровых и сильно бодрых нынче не найти, они к своим 30 годам сдали анализов больше чем мы с Шевцовой вместе взятые - мнительные зело.
И вот созвон, всем как-то тухло, я вообще сплю.
- Ой, чот пиздец, чот холодно и очень спать…
Тётя Вика - барометр: - Это давление упало, видать снег пойдёт к ночи, вот и рубит.
У меня есть погодные диагнозы на все случаи жизни, от чего хрустит…
Бойся желаний своих!
Искали спеца по нейронкам, честно говоря думали что это пиздец востребованная и редкая профессия, что хуй найти свободного.
Я всякое видела в интернете, меня после рассказа про яблоко в пизде не напугать количеством сообщений, но прошло 20 лет и мирный атом в каждый дом - людей в интернете стало в разы больше.
И случилось нашествие рисовальщиков нейро фильмов.
В количестве таком, что сейчас я уже…
Сидим в сауне, с нами очень маленькая девочка, одна пришла, одна и ушла, мама где-то в спортзале.
Умилительно маленькая, общительная и очень деловая.
Кася. С её слов 6,5 лет, но год она себе накинула точно, если не парочку.
Спросила кому сколько лет, мы самые молодые, нам 55.
Кася - Кассиопея Павловна.
- Значит папу Павлом зовут?
- ОТКУДА ВЫ ЗНАЕТЕ?!
Мы постарались не ржать, просто дружно схватились за пожилые сердеч…
Понедельник начался с прихода белочки, хотя я и не бухала.
Открываю фейсбук, в там моя старая фотка, которую я точно не постила.
С текстом вместе кака-то группа повесила, штош я тоже повешу, вдруг порадую
Этой фотке лет 7.
Сисяндры - вооо! Ручищи - ууууу! Жопа - 120. Валькирия!
Мужики тогда подкатывали очень смелые, из тех, что трезвыми не бывают.
Вот эти, которые: "Зинка моя свёкру глаз подбила, Люське космы выдрал…
Лучшее в коте - пятки.
Был чей-то текст, после которого весь запрещенный фейсбук побежал нюхать пятки своим котам.
Мой личный рекорд троганья кота за пятку около 12 часов непрерывного массажа двух задних пяток по очереди, мне милостиво позволили одной рукой печатать-работать, а второй делать массаж ноги.
Ничто так не успокаивает, часа через 4 ты в эйфории, через 12 заснул с ногой в руке
Как же хорошо, что сраные хипстеры низвели классический кофе до элитных помоев странного содержания!
Наше поколение держалось, но от коньяка камня на камне не оставили, пополнили коктейльную карту смесью армянского с абрикосовым соком.
Такой почти Беллини, только с копыт сшибает и вызывает дух кавказского деда, дух является сразу в обмороке, за ним батя с друзьями - дай сюда, совсем ополоумела напиток богов соком Доб…
Лучшее, что со мной происходит - вокзальные алкаши.
Не далее, как лет 40 назад мне сделали комплимент, после которого я как начала жрать всё что не прибито, так и продолжаю.
«Ножки тооооненькие, а жрать-то хочется!»
Это дословно.
И вот сейчас стою я и любуюсь шавухой, изожрать или дома что-то готовить решаю.
И кажется те же самые алкаши мне:
- «Да пожри ты нормально, анорексичка хуева!»
Так себе комплимент конечно, …
Зависть такое чувство интересное, что даже не сразу понимаешь, что всё это ты от зависти.
Смотришь вот какие-то отрывки русских сериалов, конечно же выкладывают лучшие кусочки.
И вроде не ужас как плохо, бывает и хуже, но почему же это всё так долго и нудно снято?
А потому что каждое говно, которому удалось что-то снять, мнит себя Тарковским.
И вот эти долгие планы, странные панорамы, медленный наезд камеры, бескрайн…
Когда мне ещё не довелось узнать, как вкусны и полезны вещества расширяющие сознание, работала я инструктором по аквааэробике.
Работала в том же бассейне, куда сейчас мне надо ходить, чтоб не сдохнуть от паралича всей бабки и я даже хожу и там печально жру в столовой, с видом на голых пенсионеров.
Аппетит мне это не портит, просто для себя отмечаю, что если плохо молиться, то вон 200 кило бабушка - это ты через пару …
Хорошо быть популярным блогером!
Таким немножечко совсем популярненьким в узеньких кружочках.
Если вот большим жирным блогером с миллионом подписчиков - это не знаю, хорошо жить ещё лучше.
Пришла с работы домой, а под дверью коробка здоровенная, которую я не заказывала.
В здоровенной коробке ещё две поменьше.
Я б вообще зассала это открыть, но я жадная и от жадности смелею.
Две коробки влажных салфеток «для всей семь…
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @viketz_off. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
С. Плиев. Истории из ж. @istizh · 21,239 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 September 2026
Александр Райн| Канал авторских историй @RaynAlexandr · 32,203 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Хьюстон, у нас проблемы @we_have_problems · 20,228 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 September 2026
В поиске того самого @lvira_lina_up · 18,865 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 October 2026
Обратная сторона Л. @semikolennyh · 18,754 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
Женщина и прочие неприятности @conflict_in · 49,704 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
ADME @adme_ru_official · 22,922 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Барышня шутить изволит @baryshnya_shutit · 44,766 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
Максимально наша @maximalno_nasha · 25,489 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Мамыкина явилась @onwritingwell · 23,416 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
О зверях и людях (Диана Удовиченко) @diana_udovichenko · 27,324 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
DarkZotovLand @darkzotovland · 104,285 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голая женщина в метро” (@viketz_off), 17,983 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viketz_off.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.