Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ШТОШ

Channel

ШТОШ

@wb_prekrati

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,348subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002010313112
TypeChannel
Username@wb_prekrati
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wb_prekrati

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,34610,40510,375.57 August 2026 — 10,403 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,403 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,400 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,392 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,382 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,380 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,379 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,370 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,405 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,402 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,400 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,392 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,386 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,384 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,382 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,380 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,377 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,371 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,369 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,374 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,384 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,385 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,377 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,370 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,365 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,359 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,354 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,349 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,347 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,346 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,347 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,348 subscribers10,3487 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,337–10,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:4010,348+1
16 Sept 2026, 12:4010,347+1
14 Sept 2026, 19:1710,346-1
13 Sept 2026, 05:5610,347-2
11 Sept 2026, 05:2010,349-5
8 Sept 2026, 11:5510,354-5
5 Sept 2026, 09:1710,359-6
3 Sept 2026, 13:1810,365-5
1 Sept 2026, 07:2710,370-7
31 Aug 2026, 08:2210,377-8
30 Aug 2026, 07:5410,385+1
29 Aug 2026, 06:1610,384+10
28 Aug 2026, 07:2410,374+5
27 Aug 2026, 04:3410,369-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:5410,371-6
25 Aug 2026, 02:0410,377-3
23 Aug 2026, 14:2410,380-2
22 Aug 2026, 02:1410,382-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:2410,384-2
19 Aug 2026, 20:4610,386first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 10,348 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held40 (9 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total9,151
Reactions total1,001
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,573 reactions across 40 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,92138.6%
😁1,13315.0%
🔥89511.8%
80410.6%
💯4716.22%
🥰2733.60%
👍2232.94%
🙈1532.02%
🤝1321.74%
😭1251.65%
❤‍🔥1071.41%
🤯851.12%
👏690.911%
🏆530.7%
😱350.462%
🍾180.238%
🦄160.211%
💔140.185%
🍓110.145%
🕊70.092%
7 further kinds280.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wb_prekrati. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.50%
1 of 40 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,350
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,840
over 39 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5yAT9Kp113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC951 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Недавно в нашей семье случилось страшное. Муж проснулся утром, подошёл к зеркалу и увидел Предательство. Предательство выглядело как диагональный залом на лбу от подушки. Мужчины же вообще как устроены? В отличие от нас, они в свои поры с лупой не всматриваются. Они искренне верят, что гравитация и старение — это женские мифы, а сами они — вечно молодые и свежие. А потом херак! — наволочка оставляет шрам и начинается

18👍8😁8🤣2🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,140 views177 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Сегодня выяснилось, что акт возмездия для местного Андрея зацепил мирное население. Моя ма Роальд прочитал этот пост и буквально обрюзг от отчаяния. Потерял сон и веру в женскую адекватность. Пишет, мол, вот так зайдёшь к современной женщине в личку с букетом благих намерений, а тебя разберут на запчасти, прополощут в кислоте и соберут обратно уже в виде таксидермированного суслика. В итоге из-за меня всю ночь не

🤣119🔥40👏124🥰2

27 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,390 views201 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

По телеграму пошли ковровые бомбардировки. У нас тут завёлся серийный романтик. Вчера моя подружка у себя на канале уже била тревогу: ходит, говорит, некий сладкоголосый бот-ловелас, рассылает одинаковые скрипты, охмуряет честных женщин. А я читаю и понимаю: ёптить! Знакомые все лица скрипты! Этот пиксельный Дон Жуан и ко мне в личку заглянул. Видимо, у него чёс по женским каналам. А у нас с ним вообще на самом ин

🤣154🔥23🙈105👍4😁4😢1

26 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,440 views283 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Вчера гуляли с дочерью в парке. Решили упасть за столик, заточить по блинчику. Только мы распаковали свои углеводы, как за соседний стол швартуется стайка молодёжи. Возраст сложноопределяемый. То ли 10 класс, то ли уже магистратуру заканчивают. Сейчас же хрен поймёшь: сидит лоб, борода гуще, чем у Карла Маркса, взгляд с прищуром ипотечника, а в рюкзаке сменка и пенал с Человеком-пауком. Сидят, значит, трут за жизнь

128😁95🔥35🤣13👏6🥰5🙈1

26 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,390 views42 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, доигрались? Последняя неделя лета, товарищи! Не знаю, как вы, а я чувствую, что с каждым днём всё сложнее сохранять оптимизм. Бесконечный чёртов информационный шум давит и проникает, даже если от него скрываться, тревожность фонит на заднем плане. Короче, чтобы это компенсировать, я твёрдо решила выжать из этого августа всё до последней капли. Поэтому продолжаю сканировать пространство на тему «куда бы ещё с

👍2114❤‍🔥4😍3

26 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,350 views102 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Я конечно понимаю, что медицина не стоит на месте, постоянно какие-то инновации и открытия, но такой, кхм, уникальный способ «контрацепции» я вижу впервые🥹

🤣78🙈17😁4🦄2🥰1

25 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,490 views159 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, сходили мы в субботу на Lumisfera. Ожидания оправдались, было ооочень атмосферно! И даже дочь — человек, чья толерантность к высокому искусству обычно заканчивается на «Щенячьем патруле», высидела всё это время, практически не ноя. Но, чтобы добраться до духовного катарсиса, нужно было, по классике жанра, сначала пройти полосу препятствий. У нас на Динамо и в обычные-то дни с парковкой дела обстоят так, буд

😁88🔥3024👏8💔4😢3👍1🥰1

22 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈2,190 views132 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣87💯21😭17🔥52

21 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC≈2,190 views168 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Мастер-класс как оптимизировать заправку в условиях тотального апокалипсиса. Дано: топливный ажиотаж и бесконечные очереди на АЗС. План: 1. Получить от мужа утреннюю инсайдерскую инфу: за городом есть заправка вообще без очередей! 2. Метнуться туда грациозным и очень стремительным сайгаком. 3. Триумфально приехать и заправиться. Реально никого! 4. Гордиться собой, что гениально сэкономила время. Итог: полный бак э

🤣131🏆139😁8🔥4💯3

20 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈2,350 views221 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Вчера заезжала в ламоду забрать заказ и случайно подслушала прекрасное. Стою, шуршу пакетами и тут сквозь хлипкую занавеску прорывается ЗВУК. Вернее, сначала это была вибрация. Возможно, так звучал тектонический разлом перед тем, как похоронить под собой Помпеи. А потом оформляется фраза. Женский голос чеканит: — Ты думал, я эска? Ты что... ПРАВДА ДУМАЛ, ЧТО Я ЭСКА?! Я аж шуршать перестала. Я не видела этого парн

🤣176💯2210👏9😈2🔥1😢1

19 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,840 views292 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Дочь недавно посмотрела «Историю игрушек» и после задала резонный вопрос, мол правда ли, что игрушки по ночам могут оживать? Знаете этот момент, да? Когда балансируешь на тонком канате между тем, чтобы вырастить психически здорового человека, и тем, чтобы не стать душной занудой. В общем, я как-то максимально уклончиво ответила, типа может да, а может и нет, кто ж их знает. Не рушить же детскую матрицу фантазий рань

😁15463👍46🔥20🕊4🤣3💯2

17 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,300 views134 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ваще изначально, в недалёком 2024 году, этот канал задумывался как место, где я буду делиться классными, небанальными штуками, которые купила и осталась в полнейшем восторге. Но потом чёт закрутилось, завертелось и всё мутировало в то, что есть сейчас. Магазин на диване сам собой прикрылся. Но нет нет, да и ловлю себя на мысли, что хочется помимо основных коммерческих интеграций, делиться иногда и чисто некоммерчес

67👍42🔥23🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @wb_prekrati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@wb_prekrati edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Александр Бессонов
@AleksBessonov · 60,410
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Женщина и прочие неприятности
@conflict_in · 49,596
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
БЕЗУДЕРЖНОЕ ВЕСЕЛЬЕ
@bezuderjnoe_veselie · 33,764
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Вшивая интеллигенция
@vshivaya_intelligenciya · 51,791
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
Ira_khay
@ira_khay · 45,788
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
Барышня шутить изволит
@baryshnya_shutit · 45,494
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
мерзкие женщины
@merzkiej · 33,275
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Мамыкина явилась
@onwritingwell · 23,505
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Gromov Opinion
@gromovproject · 37,778
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
Собачий Потрох
@sobachkyn_potroh · 47,604
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Печатные выражения
@pechat_sallyks · 26,373
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
МАША И ЕДА
@delikatessenit · 46,387
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ШТОШ” (@wb_prekrati), 10,348 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wb_prekrati.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.