Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Winelawyers

Channel

Winelawyers

@winelawyers

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

936subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001085167204
TypeChannel
Username@winelawyers
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/winelawyers

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

927936931.56 August 2026 — 927 subscribers7 August 2026 — 927 subscribers13 August 2026 — 935 subscribers21 August 2026 — 934 subscribers27 August 2026 — 931 subscribers4 September 2026 — 929 subscribers13 September 2026 — 936 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 926–937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 00:18936+7
4 Sept 2026, 02:40929-2
27 Aug 2026, 00:08931-3
21 Aug 2026, 00:54934-1
13 Aug 2026, 06:27935+8
7 Aug 2026, 05:25927no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:33927first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4247.2%
😁1820.2%
🔥1618.0%
77.87%
😱33.37%
🤮22.25%
👎11.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC99 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я правильно понимаю, что банк ОТП прислал мне блюющий смайлик?:)

4 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈2,340 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Руки все не доходят написать про редкий нынче случай очень хорошо и по европейской цене. Альбариньо Laxas в КиБ очень хорошего уровня, хрустящее и минеральное, без обилия всяких абрикосов, как это бывает в базе нынче, около 13 евро на месте, в КБ 1500+, но бывают скидки, под финал ЧМ было куплено в районе 1250р, это отличная цена, внутри нас ждет вино уровня какого-нибудь Granbazan. В винотеках Кавины же (важно: имен

👍11

3 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC229 viewsread 6 August 2026

Не сразу понял, что Каудильо тут ни при чем, но история огонь)) https://t.me/ilparadiso_perduto/2486

1 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC282 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пересматривая классику. Из версии Хон Гиль дона для советского проката времен борьбы с алкоголем вырезали упоминания "хорошей не разбавленной водки", а также то, что могучий боец и учитель Хон Гиль дона пьет вино в объёмах, что на вино обменивают ему туши дичи)

👍21😁1

31 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC250 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PrigovorchikiPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC299 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очень хочется попробовать барЕло, да еще и с бактерией, никогда не доводилось:(( Обычно спикер на ютюбе вещает в формате сланцев на кухне, но барело потребовало стиля) Он еще автор высказывания про безликость пино блана. (Не он вроде). Я люблю иногда мракобесие всякое винное на ютюбчике по выходным посмотреть) https://t.me/RamonSosnovskiy/4621

😁4🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC385 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Что-то адовое в сфере алкоголя затевают создатели Чебупелей:)

😁5😱2

25 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTC423 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Опробовал в Яндекс лавке их раздел "с рынка". И это прям очень хорошо, не вставая с дивана. Помидоры как из бабушкиной теплицы, шикарная узбекская черешня, огурцы пока не попробовал. Один минус, помидоры они хранят в холодильнике, грешно это.

👍111

24 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC408 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Презентовали творчество узбекских винокуров, баночка 100мл, можно на борт:)

🔥2🤮2😱1

23 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC390 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А как было удобно по сбп через цифру деньги в Казахстан отправлять:( https://t.me/ohmyswiftblog/1066

👍1

21 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC480 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

У кота взор "век воли не видать":) https://t.me/kommersant_nn/19151?single

😁2

21 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTC487 viewsread 6 August 2026

Насколько знаю, у них прикручены просто переводы через узбекский Unired со своей комиссией, точнее, со своим курсом. Если так, то они бредят про самому себе. Просто у узбеков иногда глюки бывают, я пару раз платежи в ручном режиме проводил. https://t.me/Prigovorchiki/75908

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @winelawyers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Winelawyers” (@winelawyers), 936 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/winelawyers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.