Live stream finished (3 hours)

Channel
Ежедневный винный телеграф (официальный канал)
@the_daily_winegraph
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,277subscribers
+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001824518965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_daily_winegraph |
| Created | 23 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_daily_winegraph |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 6,277 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 6,280 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 6,282 | +7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 6,275 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:53 | 6,274 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 6,266 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 6,264 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 6,267 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 6,265 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 6,257 | +53 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 6,204 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 6,211 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 6,213 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 6,211 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 6,211 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,375 reactions across 28 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 905 | 38.1% | |
| 🔥 | 498 | 21.0% | |
| 😁 | 347 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 253 | 10.7% | |
| ✍ | 85 | 3.58% | |
| 🥰 | 47 | 1.98% | |
| 💯 | 41 | 1.73% | |
| 😱 | 40 | 1.68% | |
| 🤮 | 34 | 1.43% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 0.926% | |
| 🍾 | 18 | 0.758% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 0.758% | |
| 🤓 | 14 | 0.589% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 0.505% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.463% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 0.337% | |
| 💅 | 5 | 0.211% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.126% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.126% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.084% | |
| 5 further kinds | 9 | 0.379% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Live stream started
Live stream finished (21 seconds)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (37 seconds)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (8 seconds)
Live stream started
Через 10 минут начинаем https://www.youtube.com/live/7j64Z0qwrQY?si=vJe_d824GnYc0laK https://vkvideo.ru/video60488910_456239416 и тут в ТГ
🔥15👍8👏4❤1
Ну, что :) 400 голосов набрали, пора и сдаваться! Менее всего на вариант нейросети с результатом 6% похож вариант «…вино с ароматом водопроводной воды в бутылке из-под лимонада» — автором которой является ChatGPT. Нейросеть очень не хотела, чтобы ее узнали и ее не узнали :) Не так далеко от нее, тоже очень человечный человек с 7% — «…потрясающе вялое, бездушное и унылое вино» — Джо Аппел (Joe Appel). В оригинале: “…
🔥26👍21❤3
Posted without readable text
😁29👏4👍3❤2🥰1
Есть сорта, которым досталась мировая слава: Шардоне, Рислинг, Совиньон Блан. А есть Пино Гри — старый европейский сорт из семейства Пино, генетически почти тот же Пино Нуар, только с необычной серо-розовой кожицей ягод. Он выращивается от Эльзаса и Северной Италии до Германии, Австрии, Словении, США и Новой Зеландии, продаётся миллионами бутылок — и при этом редко оказывается в центре серьёзного разговора о великих …
🔥63👍38❤20
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @the_daily_winegraph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто сегодня самый популярный винный блогер на Ютюбе? (по реальному современному отклику на ролик)
- Игорь Черский8%
- Стефан Скулич2%
- Жан-Поль Алкоголь6%
- Мин Вин1%
- Джаст Ту Вайн0%
- Такое Вино16%
- Вилла Вино0%
- Кристина Никитичева1%
- Кто все эти люди?30%
- Мне просто ответ посмотреть!35%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Podsol_cider · 2031 postРусский Винный Клуб Воронеж
@VineClubVrn · 681 postСыр есть
@cheeseest · 1,9101 postMoscow Cider Awards
@moscowciderawards · 1521 postНовое Русское Вино
@newrussianwine · 4031 postРУ.ЛИ: Яблоко и Лоза
@ru_li_sidr_vino · 1861 postУ Трубы. Еда и Вино.
@uTruby · 4291 postВино и Ко
@vino_i_co · 11,6211 postWinelawyers
@winelawyers · 9361 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@curl_wine · 5803 postsВкусадемия
@vkusademia · 3572 postsЧикалов. Недвижимость, вино, путешествия и прочее веселье:)
@a_chikalov · 4051 postВино и люди
@nevvino · 24,5651 postВинный душнила
@RamonSosnovskiy · 14,7741 postУ Трубы. Еда и Вино.
@uTruby · 4291 postWine Reflections
@wine_reflections · 3161 postвинодельня Бердяева
@winery_berdyaev · 1,2271 postПод звездой Высотки️
@zvezdavisotki · 9871 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@takoe_vino · 28,336
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
@nevvino · 24,565
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
@simple_wine_news · 46,707
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
@ovintso · 27,978
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
@rbc_wine · 31,080
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@chris_tella_wine · 102,087
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ежедневный винный телеграф (официальный канал)” (@the_daily_winegraph), 6,277 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_daily_winegraph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.