الكلام مهم جداً.

Channel
خذ لقلبك مايرويه
@yamahdimdd3133
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,865subscribers
-901 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001621519195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yamahdimdd3133 |
| Description | اللهم صل على محمد وال محمد ياصاحب الزمان إنتظارك يخفف عني ثقل الدنيا 🥀 🦋الصيدلانيّة أم فاطمة 🦋 اني وكادرنا بخدمتكم @mahdawiatt_313 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yamahdimdd3133 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 28,865 | -46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 28,911 | -37 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 28,948 | -30 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 28,978 | -37 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 29,015 | -68 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 29,083 | -39 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 29,122 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 29,148 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:33 | 29,178 | -36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 29,214 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 29,249 | -39 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 29,288 | -31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 29,319 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 29,338 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 29,360 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 29,378 | -31 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 29,409 | -35 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 29,444 | -21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 29,465 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 29,479 | first reading |
Engagement
139 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.48%
- avg views ÷ 28,865 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,290
- 100 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 100
- of 139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (29 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 129,380 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 23:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,420
- Videos
- ≈330
- Links
- ≈67
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 83.9% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 12.9% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdirGdtuJX0/?stkn=MXduaTFmaG8waTBycQ==
سلام عليكم ورحمة الله بناتي العزيزات نصحبكم في ورشةٍ خاصة لمطالعة محطات من حياة امرأةٍ قدمت أروع صور التضحية والفكر في سبيل الإسلام وتركت أثرًا خاليًا من التاريح لا يمحوه الزمن كانت وما زالت رمزًا للوعي والقيادة النسوية الواعية وقدوةً يُستضاء بمسيرتها العلمية والتربوية… تسلط ورشتنا الضوء على سيرة وفكر #الشهيدة بنت الهدى لنستلهم من أدبها وعلمها وموقفها الرسالي استمعوا بشغف وتعلّموا بوعي ولنستلهم معًا أسمى معاني ال…
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ١٠-ابن أبي شيبة(تاريخ:٢٣٥هـ):قال:جاء في حديث عن زيد بن أسلم،وزيد عن أبيه أسلم وهو مولى عمر،قال:حين بويع لأبي بكر بعد رسول اللهﷺكان علي والزبير يدخلان على فاطمة بنت رسول الله فيشاورونها ويرتجعون في أمرهم فلما بلغ ذلك عمر بن الخطاب، خرج حتى دخل على فاطِمة فقال:يا بنت رسول الله ،والله ما أحد أحب الينا من إبيك ،وما من أحد أحب إلينا بعد أبيك منك،وأيم الله ما ذاك ب…
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٩-مقاتل بن عطية(تاريخ:٥٠٥هـ):قال:إن ابا بكر بعد أخذ البيعة لنفسه من الناس بالإرهاب والسيف والقوة،أرسل عمر وقنفذًا وجماعة إلى دار علي وفاطمة(عليهما السلام)،وجمع عمر الحطب على دار فاطِمة وأحرق الدار ،ولما جاءت فاطمة خلف الباب،لتّرد عمر وأصحابة عصر عمر فاطمة خلف الباب ،حتى أسقطت جنينها ونبت مسمار الباب في صدرها،وسقطت مريضة حتى ماتت. الخلافة والأمامة
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٨-جمال الدين يوسف المقدسي(تاريخ:٩٠٩هـ):في كتاب الشجرة النبوية قال:والصحيح أنّ فاطمة أسقطت جنيناً. الشجرة النبوية في نسب خير البرية
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٧-صلاح الدين الصفدي الشافعي(تاريخ:٧٦٤هـ):قال:إن عمر ضرب بطّن فاطمة يوم البيعة حتى ألقت المحسن من بطنها. الوافي بالوفيات
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٦-أبو الحسن الملطي(تاريخ:٣٧٧هـ):في كتابه{التنبيه والرد}قال:إن ابا بكر مرّ بفاطِمة(عليها السلام)فرفس في بطنها،فأسقطت،وكان سبب علتها ووفاتها،وأنه غصبها فدكاً. كتاب التنبيه والرد
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٥-أبن أبي دارم(تاريخ:٣٥٢هـ):قال:إن عمر رفس فاطِمة حتى أسقطت بمحسن. ميزان الأعتدال
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٤-محمد بن عيسى الترمذي في سسنه(تاريخ:٢٧٩هـ):روى:إنّ فاطمة قالت لأبي بكر وعمر:والله لا أكلمكما أبداً فماتت ولا تكلّمهما. سنن الترمذي أبواب السير ماجاء في تركة الرسول ﷺ
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٣-البخاري(تاريخ:٢٥٦هـ):قال:أبى ابو بكر أن يدفع إلى فاطمة منها شيئاً،فوجدت فاطمة على أبي بكر في ذلك فهجرته فلم تكلمه حتىٰ توفيت. صحيح البخاري
-مظلومية فاطِمة الزهراء(ع) | على لسان عُـلمَـاء العامة | ٢-إبراهيم بن سيار النظام(تاريخ:٢٣١هـ):قال:أن عمر ضرب بطن فاطمة يوم البيعة حتى ألقت الجنين منّ بطنها،وكان يصيح عمر:أحرقوا دارها بمن فيها،وما كان بالدار غير علي وفاطمة والحسن والحسين. الملل والنحل
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @yamahdimdd3133. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
خُذ لِـقبرِكَ مَا يعمّرهُ ؛
- أللهُمَّ صلِ على محمد والِ محمد ( ١٠٠مرة )46%
- أللهُمَّ أستغفرك عن كل ذنباً أذنبته ( ١٠٠مرة )26%
- أللهُمَّ أجعل الحُسين أول زائرًا لي في قبري ( ١٠٠مرة )48%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
إهداء لأمام الزْمَــان بهذهِ اللّيلة
- أللهُمَّ عجّل لوليك الفرج ١٠٠40%
- استغفرالله واتوب إليه ١٠٠37%
- صلوات محمدية ١٠٠53%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iraqed4 · 3,333,171#1
@almari_almahdaweh_50 · 8,114#2
@something9 · 34,665#3
@NARO299 · 834#4
@z4i_i · 10,501#5
@tumb1riq · 174,810#6
@eng_hala95 · 39,207#7
@zxvzcxz · 2,897#8
@lYIlP · 3,887#9
@z_ahraa6 · 5,032#10
@ez300 · 10,726#11
@tillkv · 82,521#12
@D8LIO · 5,845#13
@wa2004jd · 23,997#14
@iisiis0 · 98,894#15
@llam12 · 5,930#16
@Al_Huffaaz313 · 4,853#17
@cjg_313 · 16,385#18
@llnn121 · 3,423#19
@Q_u_r_an · 9,442#20
@mfahh313 · 3,157#21
@ali11041 · 247,302#22
@Miracles_20 · 20,619#23
@musawu · 38,278#24
@zz_eei · 21,440#25
@imamsajadas · 29,998#26
@xnnup · 10,872#27
@ff_12th · 1,808#28
@mahde_3137 · 7,437#29
@hussein16_313 · 155#30
@n4siii · 1,211#31
@MGXMG · 41,636#32
@malika7h · 3,433#33
@Jkif9 · 937#34
@forqanwassam313 · 32,375#35
@al_kamed · 4,298#36
@zhh313z · 24,593#37
@Hemsm313 · 3,739#38
@alkhidmaa · 769#39
@allla_00 · 4,748#40
@books_mad · 5,238#41
@Khaymat_AlMuntazir · 1,193#42
@NoorRadi · 13,712#43
@iaaaaa · 670,110#44
@matestasabnesh · 17,078#45
@JUHHN98 · 6,727#46
@Tohr_313 · 2,852#47
@gthyuhujj · 4,534#48
@zahrayiyat_50 · 12,857#49
@The1Holy1Quran1 · 80,081#50
@Janno_313 · 2,635#51
@Karbala_w · 3,166#52
@MMMLooo999 · 951 (as read 9 September 2026)#53
@alquran_akarim · 4,703#54
@cyidu · 1,622#55
@imamal1 · 7,799#56
@womenquran · 9,494#57
@H3Combatant · 5,108#58
@ya_zharra · 1,320#59
@z_zier · 1,473#60
@Sixth_Portal · 80,949#61
@AZI_631 · 13,700#62
@llquraanll · 248,297#63
@YIUII1 · 2,640#64
@llkumaill · 17,356#65
@mhu_313h · 2,512#66
@dioti7 · 4,562#67
@maraj313 · 2,212#68
@Explanations3 · 6,279#69
@mhdi3i3 · 9,707#70
@Husseinyoon · 7,636#71
@draft3i · 3,659#72
@LO_8F · 3,296#73
@maysamsami · 1,049#74
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@musawu · 38,278
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
@US_DTsa · 27,995
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 9 September 2026
@Sixth_Portal · 80,949
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@z2_jj · 91,853
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 August 2026
@YK_CW · 114,220
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 August 2026
@XXX8Z · 261,302
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خذ لقلبك مايرويه” (@yamahdimdd3133), 28,865 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yamahdimdd3133.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.