❤️:

Channel
- مَلجأ القَصَائِدِ .
@MGXMG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,636subscribers
-581 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001918702438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MGXMG |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MGXMG |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 41,636 | +188 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 41,448 | -108 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 41,556 | -180 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 41,736 | -134 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 41,870 | -73 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 41,943 | -164 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 42,107 | +206 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 41,901 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:43 | 41,915 | -24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 41,939 | -94 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 42,033 | -55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 42,088 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 42,116 | -88 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 42,204 | +115 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 42,089 | -58 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 42,147 | +31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 42,116 | -57 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 42,173 | -33 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 42,206 | -106 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 42,312 | first reading |
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.4%
- avg views ÷ 41,636 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11,800
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 74 (18 July 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 473,583 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 02:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 141
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 26
- of 74 we hold a reading for · 35%
- Most on one post
- 47
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MGXMG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 74 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
مِثل مَا گَـال سيِّد سَلام : " شِدة وأصبُرلها "🎧.
عتابُنا قصائديًا تحديدًا باسمِيًّا 😔.
أريد أحذفها بس خاف أكو بنية بعدها محتاجتها وتريد تآخذ منها 📞💢 !
ميِخالف يمة الله موجود✨✨
باسم وجابر الكاظمي 😔.
يارب : 🤍
مِثِل مَا كال بَاسِم الكَربَلَائي : 🩵
لچ عيب انتِ بنية 💔
الفترة الجاية حتكون بعنوان : تتجدد الايام ، ونحقق الاحلام محلى الفرح لو دام يارب ياقيوم 💕✨.
المستخدم مشغول بهذهِ القصيدة :🤍
🎧:
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @MGXMG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@OOIIIEEE · 55,99215 postsحِزن شَفاف
@cf67z · 87,66813 postsشِنَساهنٰ
@Nh_NE · 83,81111 posts𝐁𝐀𝐍O 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑
@shukran4_56 · 43,0128 postsقصائد حسينيه.
@eqri8 · 1456 postsخياطة أم زهراء للفرشات 🎀
@Z1XZ11 · 30,5276 postsموقع نتائج الدور الثاني
@ceen6 · 43,1315 postsمُغِيثُ الصَّالِحِينَ .
@clilx1 · 30,1605 postsثروناو :
@cf67c · 43,6784 postsمَلاذكُم
@cf67e · 57,5384 postsسَكينةُ آية
@ZE_QFE · 54,2994 postsمَلجَأ ألعَبد .
@M_Mll3 · 19,3503 postsدَيرة هَلي .
@Mzajyati · 27,4933 postsPov :
@t88q1 · 40,7163 postsملجأ
@Al_Mahdi_313m · 952 postsابي الفضل ، الامام العباس
@PA_POO_313 · 19,4842 postsكليشات ذكاء اصطناعي
@QCQ37 · 77,5862 postsكلايش بنات 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝗚𝗶𝗿𝗹𝘀
@ztt223 · 33,1522 postsعُزلة المُهتدين .
@zz_zzml · 85,5592 postsعـشـاق الــسـلـطـان
@aa_m_313 · 1,5991 postهبـَه الحـربي
@e_3k0 · 621 postرۆحٌٍ ۆريَــحٍـآنْ✨
@M2_AI6 · 1071 postPov :
@povv4 · 123,3241 post﮼بغـداديـات🌿💚.
@XG_DE · 1,9451 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@clilx1 · 30,1606 postsPov :
@povv4 · 123,3242 postsقصائد حسينيه
@fflx1 · 52,5891 postجَبُر
@II8UlI · 6,9421 postميـلآ️🍂
@m_m9118 · 2,0321 postمَلجَأ ألعَبد .
@M_Mll3 · 19,3501 postفَتَى الإِيمَانِ
@Medical449 · 9691 postلحَظة إدراك .
@rrrrriir · 92,7711 post• سـالـفـة وگـمـرة •
@x_603 · 23,0741 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ff313n · 29,707#1
@jatsqx · 3,924#2
@fgjfgi58 · 4,810#3
@xcvrin · 14,503#4
@lYIlP · 3,887#5
@z4i_i · 10,501#6
@YIUII1 · 2,640#7
@Mofas313 · 4,080#8
@cjg_313 · 16,385#9
@hussein16_313 · 155#10
@Janno_313 · 2,635#11
@IUH21 · 3,291#12
@zhh313z · 24,593#13
@IILII_L · 3,738#14
@Bani_hashim_313 · 810#15
@Borea5 · 19,088#16
@nstz2023 · 1,439#17
@llNl9ll0 · 2,218#18
@No_V92 · 1,484#19
@ksugsb313 · 5,944#20
@IBIUT · 5,373#21
@hus_21sein · 9,100#22
@t8lllo · 16,324#23
@llnn121 · 3,423#24
@dentiema · 3,365#25
@Karbala_w · 3,166#26
@ll6zllI · 6,460#27
@M_zl2 · 2,551#28
@ZMll_3l3 · 1,764#29
@bto10o · 1,576#30
@n1444h · 1,676#31
@YIU7l · 798#32
@mo_poir · 872#33
@P_7_16 · 2,096#34
@TYllllli · 444#35
@rrr_313_313 · 1,982#36
@soz_313h · 680#37
@h1446h · 6,066#38
@SN_ZR · 1,439#39
@xnnup · 10,872#40
@r_muslim313 · 1,849#41
@iiil8liii · 6,201#42
@tyipou · 9,223#43
@lE3I3 · 1,927#44
@n7_m5i2 · 618#45
@btohv · 3,090#46
@sara_313l · 552#47
@nnn_313n · 1,396#48
@MUSIN_1 · 628#49
@K_Rl_b · 1,746#50
@Husseinmeni · 841#51
@naabao · 3,163#52
@iil9z0 · 2,214#53
@n1446h · 621#54
@lilaisf · 605#55
@SIIIlIIR · 8,838#56
@jnoorh · 1,136#57
@nay_222 · 3,987#58
@E_Y80 · 1,852#59
@ttmeop99 · 1,269#60
@zahra_ghaliip · 427#61
@Taibba · 1,020 (as read 29 August 2026)#62
@mahde_3137 · 7,437#63
@TABARk_NABA · 6,496#64
@gio0tj · 1,483#65
@UIOUPB · 20,146#66
@iix_313 · 493#67
@OO_T89 · 659#68
@tr_me313 · 769#69
@ali11041 · 247,302#70
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@OPUI21 · 26,400
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
@farashah_ahdiu · 33,947
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
@AlKhabariPlatformCenter · 49,454
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@re_la_313 · 25,353
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
@Hob_alhussein22 · 23,824
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
@HH_HHZ63 · 23,204
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
@mk_88888 · 23,224
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
@BOOK_93 · 46,222
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
@iy6u8 · 51,828
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@PD_QA · 69,247
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@yamahdimdd3133 · 28,865
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@muslimalwaeli · 40,564
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026
@alkafeel_global_network · 107,752
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@F8F111 · 65,166
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@huditi2017 · 175,647
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@hikmat_rayhana · 27,446
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
@FRANKO333 · 403,304
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@mohammad_aljannami · 26,880
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
@Ya_Zahraa_2020 · 34,812
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
@alruer · 66,822
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@imamhussain_ar · 153,454
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@mmmmd12 · 84,552
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- مَلجأ القَصَائِدِ .” (@MGXMG), 41,636 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MGXMG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.